Skip to content

Mechanisms Of Orbitofrontal Stimulation in Depression

Mechanisms Of Orbitofrontal Stimulation in Depression (MOOD)

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07230990
Acronym
MOOD
Enrollment
80
Registered
2025-11-17
Start date
2026-04-15
Completion date
2030-12-01
Last updated
2026-05-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Major Depressive Disorder (MDD)

Keywords

Depression, Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), orbitofrontal cortex, Frontal pole

Brief summary

The orbitofrontal cortex (OFC), a region involved in emotional regulation, decision making, and reward processing, is a key area linked to antidepressant response. This study tests whether noninvasive stimulation of the OFC using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) can improve depressive symptoms. TMS uses magnetic fields generated by a coil placed next to the scalp to alter brain activity.

Detailed description

The main purpose of this study is to test a new treatment target for major depressive disorder (MDD) and to understand the brain mechanisms that may lead to antidepressant response. The treatment target of this study is the right orbitofrontal cortex (OFC), a brain region towards the front of the brain involved in emotion regulation, reward-processing, and decision-making. Other studies have shown that stimulating the OFC can improve depression symptoms. However, no study has yet directly compared the effects of real (active) versus placebo (sham) OFC stimulation on both mood and brain function. Comparison of active versus sham treatment is key in medical research. This study aims to fill that gap by comparing active versus sham stimulation of the right OFC in people with MDD who are currently experiencing moderate to severe symptoms. Participants will take part in a two phases: a triple-blind, randomized, sham-controlled phase, followed by an open-label phase where all participants receive active OFC stimulation. Aim 1: To determine whether active TMS targeting the right OFC, compared to sham stimulation at the same site, reduces depressive symptom severity in individuals with MDD. Aim 2: To test whether active TMS to the right OFC, compared to sham stimulation at the same site, reduces ruminative symptoms in individuals with MDD.

Interventions

DEVICESham TMS

The MagVenture MagPro system's active/sham coil (e.g., Cool-B65 A/P) will be used to deliver either active or sham TMS. The sham mode reproduces the same clicking sound and scalp sensation as active stimulation but does not induce cortical activation. The built-in MagPro double-blind feature ensures operator, participant, and investigator blinding. All participants will be randomized to receive active or sham TMS to the OFC in the first phase.

TMS uses magnetic fields generated by a coil placed next to the scalp to alter brain activity at a specific region (i.e., OFC) protocol. Here, active TMS protocol is continuous intermittent theta burst stimulation (cTBS, a type of inhibitory TMS) to the right OFC. Investigators will use the MagVenture MagPro system's active/sham coil (e.g., Cool-B65 A/P) to deliver either active or sham TMS. All participants will be randomized to receive active or sham TMS to the OFC in the first phase. In the second phase, all participants will receive active TMS to the OFC. The active protocol to the right OFC is: continuous intermittent theta burst stimulation (cTBS, a type of inhibitory TMS).

Sponsors

Subha Subramanian
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Participants, care providers, investigators, and outcome assessors will be blinded to treatment allocation (active vs. sham TMS). Blinding will be maintained using coded assignments that indicate which side of the MagPro Cool B65 A/P coil (MagVenture A/S, Denmark) is positioned for stimulation. This procedure ensures that all study personnel remain unaware of stimulation condition throughout the trial.

Intervention model description

Participants will be randomized into active or sham TMS groups and active or sham TMS to the right OFC. They will then undergo a washout period. After this, all participants will receive active TMS to the OFC. This region corresponds to the FP2 electrode location in the international 10-20 EEG system and is also referred to as the frontal pole.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age 18-65 years * Must be able to read, speak and understand English * DSM-5 diagnosis of major depressive disorder, experiencing a moderate to severe depressive episode (Hamilton Depression Rating Scale score greater than or equal to 17 points) * Must be judged by study staff to be capable of completing the study procedures * Participants will be in stable outpatient treatment with no recent (within the past 30 days) hospitalizations or changes in their medication regimens

Exclusion criteria

* DSM-5 moderate to severe substance use disorder within the past three months, based on Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 * Conditions that might result in increased risks of side effects or complications from rTMS or MRI, including: * History of fainting spells of unknown or undetermined etiology that might constitute seizures * Diagnosis of epilepsy with the exception of a single seizure of benign etiology (e.g., febrile seizures) in the judgment of a board-certified neurologist * Current or past history of a neurological disorder, such as stroke, a progressive neurologic disease, or intracranial brain lesion(s); and history of previous neurosurgery or head trauma that resulted in residual neurologic impairment * Any unstable medical condition * Any metal in the brain or skull (excluding dental fillings) unless cleared by the responsible covering MD * Any devices which could be affected by TMS or MRI such as a pacemaker, medication pump, nerve stimulator, cochlear implant, TENS unit, ventriculo-peritoneal shunt unless cleared by the responsible covering MD * Pregnancy; All female participants will be required to have a pregnancy test; any participant who is pregnant will not be enrolled in the study. The pregnancy test will be administered by study staff trained to administer point of care pregnancy testing that complies with institutional laboratory policies

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II)The survey will be administered at 4 timepoints: Day 1 (baseline) and Day 10 (last day) of randomized phase; Day 1 (baseline) and Day 10 (last day) of open-label phase.The BDI-II is a 21-item self-report questionnaire assessing the severity of depressive symptoms over the past two weeks. Each item is rated from 0 to 3, reflecting increasing symptom severity. The total score range is 0 to 63 points, where higher scores indicate worse depressive symptoms. The investigators will examine the change in BDI-II scores in each experimental phase (randomized and open-label).
Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) - 24 item versionThe survey will be administered at 4 timepoints: Day 1 (baseline) and Day 10 (last day) of randomized phase; Day 1 (baseline) and Day 10 (last day) of open-label phase.The HDRS is a clinician-rated scale assessing the severity of depressive symptoms across mood, somatic, and cognitive domains. Items are scored on either 3- or 5-point scales depending on the symptom. The score ranges from 0 to 76, with higher scores reflecting greater severity.
Rumination Response Scale (RRS)The survey will be administered at 4 timepoints: Day 1 (baseline) and Day 10 (last day) of randomized phase; Day 1 (baseline) and Day 10 (last day) of open-label phase.The RRS is a 22-item self-report questionnaire measuring the tendency to engage in repetitive, negative thinking about one's distress or mood. Each item is rated from 1 ("almost never") to 4 ("almost always"). Scores range from 22 to 88 points, with higher scores indicating greater rumination.

Countries

United States

Contacts

CONTACTSubha Subramanian, MD
ssubram5@bidmc.harvard.edu6176675247

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 15, 2026