Skip to content

Comparative Study of LoKomat® Exoskeleton VS C-Mill® Treadmill for Gait Recovery in Rehabilitation.

Comparative Study of Working With the LoKomat® Exoskeleton VS C-Mill® Treadmill for Gait Recovery in Rehabilitation and Improvement of Quality of Life in Adult Stroke Patients. Randomised Clinical Trial.

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07230470
Enrollment
40
Registered
2025-11-17
Start date
2025-12-09
Completion date
2026-06-20
Last updated
2025-11-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stroke

Keywords

Stroke, Quality of life, Spasticity

Brief summary

The use of robotic technology for the treatment of gait in neurological pathologies has provided different results in scientific evidence. In patients with some types of acquired brain damage, such as stroke, the use of Lokomat® therapy can bring improvements in aspects such as gait speed and balance, among other parameters and report greater functional recovery in subacute patients with greater deterioration. Similarly, the use of another technological element such as the C-Mill® reports improvements in various aspects of ambulation and balance in gait treatments for stroke patients. Likewise, the impact on the person's recovery is not only beneficial for gait rehabilitation, but also improves the perception of well-being, which can be positive in the process of readaptation to daily life. The effect of both treatments for gait rehabilitation in adults with stroke and their impact on quality of life in the neurorehabilitation clinic will be studied. adults with stroke and their impact on quality of life at the Lescer neurorehabilitation clinic Lescer, Madrid (Spain). Participants will be assessed at baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 12 weeks.

Interventions

DEVICELokomat®

To compare the effectiveness of gait rehabilitation work in adult stroke patients using the Lokomat® tool vs. stroke with the C-Mill® tool

DEVICEC-Mill

Exoelectric walking aid for patients who have suffered a stroke

Sponsors

Universidad Pontificia de Salamanca
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of stroke (haemorrhagic and/or ischaemic) by a specialist physician. . * Subjects who are cognitively capable and who sign the informed consent form.

Exclusion criteria

* Severe cognitive impairment (Mini-Mental State Examination \< 24.), or impairment that prevents correct understanding of the correct understanding of the messages and explanatory orders of the treatment and its conditions. * Diagnosis of concomitant neurological diseases and craniocerebral trauma. cranioencephalic trauma. * Other diseases that interfere with the gait process (e.g. disabling arthritis or arthrosis, other neurological diseases, other neurological diseases). disabling arthritis or osteoarthritis, other concomitant neurological diseases, etc.). \- Contraindications of the robotic tools themselves.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
quality of life scale12 weeksQoL39 scale. 0 minimum - 100 maximum (higher scores mean a better outcome).
Spasticity index12 weeksTardieu scale 0 min - 5 max (higher scores mean a worse outcome).

Countries

Spain

Contacts

Primary ContactJorge V Velázquez Saornil, PhD.
jvelazquezsa@upsa.es655909940

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026