Skip to content

The Role of Pectoralis Minor Tightness in the Development of Rotator Cuff Tears

The Role of Pectoralis Minor Muscle Tightness in the Development of Rotator Cuff Tears: A Propensity Score Matched Case-Control Study

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07228936
Acronym
PMinor-Rotator
Enrollment
90
Registered
2025-11-14
Start date
2025-06-18
Completion date
2026-08-03
Last updated
2026-08-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pectoralis Minor Muscle Tension, Pectoralis Minor Tightness, Rotator Cuff Injuries, Shoulder Impingement Syndrome

Keywords

rotator cuff, Rotator Cuff Injuries, Posture, Scapula, Pectoralis Muscles, Arthroscopy, Shoulder Joint, Pectoralis Minor

Brief summary

This study investigates whether tightness of a small chest muscle called the pectoralis minor is associated with the development of partial rotator cuff tears in the shoulder. Using a propensity score matched case-control design, the study compares patients with rotator cuff tears (case group, n=45) to patients with intact rotator cuffs (control group, n=45). Adults aged 18-55 who are evaluated by MRI and/or shoulder arthroscopy at Gazi University Hospital may be invited. The case group includes patients found to have partial rotator cuff tears during arthroscopy. The control group includes patients whose rotator cuff was documented as intact by MRI. Groups are matched 1:1 on age, sex, BMI, and dominant side. Before surgery, two trained clinician measures shoulder posture and pectoralis minor length using simple external tools (a digital caliper and ruler-like square). For arthroscopy patients, the surgeon records general arthroscopic findings. No extra procedures are added for research. We expect to include 90 participants total. The primary hypothesis is that pectoralis minor tightness is more prevalent in patients with rotator cuff tears compared to controls. A secondary hypothesis is that tears in patients with pectoralis minor tightness more often partial-thickness bursal side rotator cuff tear. Results may help clinicians understand shoulder mechanics and improve prevention or rehabilitation strategies.

Detailed description

Rationale and Objectives Pectoralis minor (PM) tightness alters scapular position (anterior tilt, internal rotation) and may increase subacromial compression. This propensity score matched case-control study evaluates whether PM tightness is associated with the development of partial rotator cuff tears (RCTs). Design and Setting Single-center, propensity score matched case-control study at a tertiary academic hospital (orthopaedic shoulder service, Gazi University Hospital). Care is not altered by participation. All surgical and imaging procedures are standard of care; research procedures are limited to noninvasive postural/PM length measurements and structured data collection. Participants Inclusion criteria consisted of patients aged 18-55 years who were scheduled to undergo surgical treatment for a partial-thickness rotator cuff tear (case group) and individuals aged 18-55 years with no evidence of rotator cuff or other shoulder pathology on magnetic resonance imaging (control group). Patients were excluded if they had a history of trauma, thoracic outlet syndrome, systemic inflammatory disease, prior surgery on the affected shoulder, and declined participation in the examination. After application of the eligibility criteria, patients with partial-thickness rotator cuff tears will be matched in a 1:1 ratio with patients without rotator cuff or other shoulder pathology. Matching was performed based on age, sex, body mass index (BMI), and dominant extremity involvement. Covariate balance was assessed using absolute standardized differences, with a predefined threshold of 0.1. Study Procedures Preoperative assessments (same-day or pre-op clinic): * Pectoralis minor length (mm): Pectoralis minor length was measured using a digital caliper, with the coracoid process and the fourth rib adjacent to the sternum serving as palpable anatomical landmarks; three trials recorded; mean used for analysis. * Medial scapular border-thoracic distance (mm) using rulers. * Forward shoulder posture using a 300 mm square. * Imaging abstraction: Standard shoulder radiographs and MRI summarized. * Anatomical and radiological measurements were assessed by two independent authors blinded to patient's group status. Intraoperative assessment (for arthroscopy patients): Surgeons document tear characteristics using a standardized form based on video visualization. Sample Size and Power A priori power analysis was performed using effect sizes derived from PMI measurements in previous studies (Cohen's d = 0.91-1.83).Using the smallest effect size as a conservative estimate, a minimum sample size of 20 patients per group was required to achieve 80% power at a two-sided α level of 0.05. Statistical Analysis Plan * Software: IBM SPSS Statistics-26, R (MatchIt package) * Normality: Shapiro-Wilk test * Comparisons: Paired t-test / Wilcoxon / McNemar for matched pairs * Primary outcome: Presence of rotator cuff tear (case vs control) as a function of PM tightness * Secondary outcome: The tear is a partial bursal surface tear as a function of PM tightness in the case group * Significance level: two-sided alpha=0.05

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Gazi University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

consisted of patients aged 18-55 years who were scheduled to undergo surgical treatment for a partial-thickness rotator cuff tear (case group) and individuals aged 18-55 years with no evidence of rotator cuff or other shoulder pathology on magnetic resonance imaging (control group). Patients were excluded if they had a history of trauma, thoracic outlet syndrome, systemic inflammatory disease, prior surgery on the affected shoulder, and declined participation in the examination.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pectoralis minor muscle length difference between case and control groupsPreoperative assessment, Day 0Comparison of pectoralis minor (PM) muscle length (mm) and pectoralis minor index between patients with partial rotator cuff tears (case group) and patients with intact rotator cuffs (control group). PM length is measured as the linear distance from coracoid tip to rib attachment using a digital caliper. The pectoralis minor index was calculated by dividing the pectoralis minor length by the patient's height and multiplying the result by 100.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Case groupIntraoperative, Day 0 (index arthroscopy)Arthroscopic classification of the partial rotator cuff tear appears to begin, recorded with a standardized intraoperative checklist in the case group only. Analysis evaluates whether PM-tight patients more frequently exhibit partial bursal side tear compared to non-tight patients within the RCT group.
Forward shoulder posturePreoperative assessment, Day 0Anterior displacement of the acromion relative to the thorax measured with a square ruler (standardized upright position). Three trials; mean used.
Medial Scapular Border Thoracic DistancePreoperative assessment, Day 0Medial scapular distance was measured as the shortest distance between the medial scapular border and the posterior chest wall using a ruler positioned perpendicular to the midpoint of the medial scapular border; three trials, mean used.
Thoracic Kyphosis and Proximal Kyphosis(Cobb angle)Preoperative imaging review, Day 0Lateral thoracic radiograph measured using the Cobb method: superior endplate line of T5 and inferior endplate line of T12 (use closest visible end vertebrae if either is obscured). Lines perpendicular to each endplate are drawn; the included angle is recorded as the thoracic kyphosis Cobb angle. Proximal thoracic kyphosis is also measured between T2 and T5.
Scapular index (Coracoid-Sternum/Acromian lateral tip - thoracic spine)Preoperative assessment, Day 0The scapular index was determined using a digital caliper by measuring the distance between the midpoint of the sternal notch and the medial aspect of the coracoid process, as well as the horizontal distance between the posterolateral angle of the acromion and the thoracic spine, and was calculated as (sternal notch-coracoid distance / acromion-thoracic spine distance) × 100.
Acromial MorphologyPreoperative imaging review, Day 0Acromial morphology was assessed on supraspinatus outlet radiographs according to the Bigliani classification and categorized as type I (flat), type II (curved), or type III (hooked).

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Contacts

CONTACTCagatay Delice
cgty_166@hotmail.com+90 546 5819056

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 5, 2026