Skip to content

Comparative Outcomes of Four Versus Two Balloon Inflation Points in Dacryoplasty for Primary Acquired Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction

Comparative Outcomes of Four Versus Two Balloon Inflation Points in Dacryoplasty for Primary Acquired Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07225244
Enrollment
50
Registered
2025-11-06
Start date
2025-11-30
Completion date
2028-06-30
Last updated
2025-11-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Primary Acquired Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction

Keywords

balloon dacryoplasty

Brief summary

Primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction

Interventions

DEVICE2 point balloon dacryoplasty with LacriCATH®

Balloon dacryoplasty with LacriCATH® (QUEST Medical Inc., Allen, TX, USA, 3 mm balloon diameter, 15 mm in length). The balloon will be inflated to 8 bars of pressure for 90 seconds, deflated, and re-inflated to 8 bars of pressure for an additional 90 seconds at two different points.

DEVICE4 point balloon dacryoplasty with LacriCATH®

Balloon dacryoplasty with LacriCATH® (QUEST Medical Inc., Allen, TX, USA, 3 mm balloon diameter, 15 mm in length). The balloon will be inflated to 8 bars of pressure for 90 seconds and deflated at four different points.

Sponsors

National Taiwan University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients diagnosed with primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction (PANDO)

Exclusion criteria

* Patients who are pregnant, with previous lacrimal procedure, upper lacrimal drainage obstruction, punctal stenosis, active dacryocystitis, dacryolithiasis, traumatic obstruction or lacrimal mass

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Munk's scale for epiphora gradingFrom enrollment to 6 months after interventionThe frequency of epiphora will be evaluated at each follow-up visit using the Munk's scale, in which patients rate the frequency of tearing on a standardized 0-5 scale based on daily symptoms (as below). Grade 0: no epiphora Grade 1: epiphora requiring dabbing less than twice a day Grade 2: epiphora requiring dabbing 2-4 times a day Grade 3: epiphora requiring dabbing 5-10 times a day Grade 4: epiphora requiring dabbing more than 10 times a day Grade 5: constant epiphora The higher the grade, the worse the condition.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Tear meniscus heightFor enrollment to 6 months after interventionTear meniscus height (TMH) will be objectively measured using the OCULUS Keratograph 5M, a noninvasive ocular surface analyzer. The measurement will be recorded in millimeters (mm) at each visit to assess tear volume and lacrimal drainage function.
Patency of the nasolacrimal system assessed by probing and irrigation of the nasolacrimal ductFor enrollment to 6 months after interventionPatency of the nasolacrimal drainage system will be evaluated by performing probing and irrigation of the nasolacrimal duct under topical anesthesia. The outcome will be categorized as patent, partially obstructed, or completely obstructed based on the ease of probe passage and saline flow into the nasal cavity.

Countries

Taiwan

Contacts

Primary ContactYi-Hsuan Wei, PhD
wn0069@yahoo.com.tw+886-972653324
Backup ContactMeng-Ju Lin, MD
linmengju8806@gmail.com+886-956238768

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026