Skip to content

Motor-Cognitive Training for Motoric Cognitive Risk Syndrome

Motor-Cognitive Training for Motoric Cognitive Risk Syndrome

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07223905
Acronym
VRTT for MCR
Enrollment
10
Registered
2025-11-03
Start date
2026-03-10
Completion date
2026-12-31
Last updated
2026-06-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Motoric Cognitive Risk Syndrome

Brief summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to investigate if combined motor-cognitive training can improve motor and cognitive symptoms in older adults with motoric cognitive risk syndrome. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Does motor-cognitive training using a virtual reality treadmill improve gait speed? * Does motor-cognitive training using a virtual reality treadmill improve cognitive functions? Researchers will compare virtual reality treadmill training with treadmill training to see if virtual reality treadmill training works to improve motor and cognitive functions in older adults at risk of dementia Participants will * Complete 18 sessions (1 hour, 3x/week, 6 weeks) of either virtual reality treadmill training or treadmill training * Complete a pre- and post-training assessment * Wear an activity sensor for seven days prior to the pre-training assessment and for seven days after the post-training assessment.

Detailed description

The objective of this single-blind randomized controlled trial is to compare the effects of combined motor-cognitive training using a virtual reality treadmill with motor training using a conventional treadmill in older adults with Motoric Cognitive Risk (MCR) syndrome. MCR is a geriatric condition characterized by slow gait speed and subjective cognitive complaints. The coexistence of motor and cognitive impairments in individuals with MCR significantly increases their risk of developing dementia. To date, randomized controlled trials investigating active interventions that simultaneously target both motor and cognitive functions remain scarce. This study will examine whether 18 training sessions, delivered over six weeks at a frequency of three 1-hour sessions per week, using a virtual reality treadmill lead to greater improvements in motor and cognitive outcomes compared to conventional treadmill training.

Interventions

The Virtual Reality Treadmill Training (VRTT) group will complete 18 training sessions over six weeks (three 1-hour sessions per week). Participants will perform prescribed tasks designed to challenge motor, cognitive, and motor-cognitive functions within a VR environment projected onto a screen in front of the treadmill (Fig 1). The VRTT system includes a conventional treadmill with a harness suspension system, camera-based motion capture (Intel RealSense, Santa Clara, CA), and a computer-generated simulation (GaitBetter, Tel Aviv, Israel). The camera tracks the participant's feet movements, which are displayed within the VR environment, allowing participants to see their feet navigating obstacles, pathways, and narrow corridors. Each session will include three walking bouts interspersed with rest breaks, targeting at least 40 minutes of active motor-cognitive training.

BEHAVIORALTreadmill Training

Participants in the Treadmill Training (TT) intervention will follow a traditional TT program without feedback from the VR system. 70 The focus will be on increasing gait speed and distance, with no motor-cognitive training such as obstacle crossing or cognitive tasks while walking.

Sponsors

University of Kansas Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Assessors will be blinded to the group allocation

Intervention model description

single-blind randomized controlled trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
65 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age ≥ 65 * English speaking * Normal cognition (CDR=0) * Meet MCR criteria * Voluntary consent

Exclusion criteria

* Major chronic unstable disease or neurological condition (e.g., seizures) * Diagnosed dementia * Active psychiatric conditions * Musculoskeletal conditions that affect walking for more than 2 minutes * Severe visual or hearing impairments * Sedating drugs (new use of narcotics or anxiolytics within the past month or chronic use that causes sedation) * Currently engaged in other non-pharmacological interventions to improve cognition or walking

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Dual-task gait speedFrom enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 weeks2 trials of 2-minute walking on a 10-meter walkway while completing auditory oddball task
CognitionFrom enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 weeksUniform Data Set (UDS) 4.0 global cognition composite score
Gait speedFrom enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 weeksGait speed on 4-meter walk test (4MWT)
Cognitive complaintsFrom enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 weeksSelf-report of cognitive complaints based on memory item of the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS): yes - no

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Dual task costFrom enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 weeksMotor and cognitive dual task cost defined using ((dual task - single task) / single task) \* 100
Spatiotemporal gait characteristicsFrom enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 weeksInertial Motion Units will collect spatiotemporal gait characteristics during single-task and dual-task walking
Cognitive domain scoresFrom enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 weeksUniform Data Set 4.0 (UDS) cognitive domain scores
P3 event-related potential (ERP)From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 weeksP3 event-related potential (ERP) extracted from electroencephalography during oddball test
Mitochondrial functionFrom enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 weeksMitochondrial functional index collected from blood serum

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 19, 2026