Skip to content

High Cardiovascular Risk Intervention With Cardio-Oncology Consultation for Prostate Cancer Following Androgen Receptor Pathway Inhibitor (ARPI) Therapy (Heart-Safe)

High Cardiovascular Risk Intervention With Cardio-Oncology Consultation for Prostate Cancer Following Androgen Receptor Pathway Inhibitor (ARPI) Therapy (Heart-Safe)

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07223385
Enrollment
80
Registered
2025-10-31
Start date
2026-08-01
Completion date
2030-08-01
Last updated
2026-08-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

CV Risk, Prostate Cancer (Diagnosis), Prostate Cancer Stage IV

Keywords

High-Risk, Lymph-node positive, ARPI Therapy, CV Risk Factors

Brief summary

In patients with prostate cancer (PC), cardiovascular disease (CVD) causes significant morbidity and is the second leading cause of death. Both pre-existing CVD and the use of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT)-a key cornerstone of treatment for men with locally advanced or metastatic PC1,2 contribute to increased CV risk. ADT has been associated with adverse metabolic effects, including increased central adiposity, elevated low-density lipoprotein (LDL) levels, impaired glycemic control, and arterial wall remodeling and endothelial dysfunction The data demonstrates that for most patients, the status quo is insufficient6 and there remains a critical gap in the early identification of high CV-risk PC patients who may benefit most from aggressive risk mitigation strategies. Mitigation strategies, like the addition of statins as primary prevention, have shown decrease in MI/CHD death across thousands of patients. Age-related expansion of hematopoietic clones carrying recurrent somatic mutations, termed clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP) has recently been identified as a significant driver of atherosclerosis, doubling the risk of coronary heart disease. Notably, while CHIP is detectable in \ 10% of persons over 70 years old, it is enriched in patients with solid malignancies, and radiotherapy exposure is among the most decisive risk factors for developing CHIP12-15. The inflammation-related metabolic signals are activated androgen signaling and exacerbated in patients with CHIP. However, the mechanistic link and clinical consequence are less understood. Therefore, it is critical to study the CV impact of CHIP and metabolic perturbations in patients with PC treated with ARSI therapy. We plan to address these critical gaps by testing our innovative hypothesis that early cardio-oncology intervention with aggressive guidelines-based CV optimization during ARPI therapy will reduce CV risk and that CHIP and metabolomics will help identify adverse metabolic remodeling to improve CV risk prediction. Robust epidemiological and clinical trial data consistently demonstrate that patients with PC are poorly optimized from a CV risk modification perspective, and existing CV risk models do not perform well in patients with cancer. The data demonstrates that for most patients, the status quo is insufficient and there remains a critical gap in the early identification of high CV-risk PC patients who may benefit most from aggressive risk mitigation strategies.

Interventions

OTHERCardio-Oncology Referral

Referral to cardio-oncology for guidelines-based personalized cardio-oncology management

OTHERNotification to PCP/General Cardiologist

Notification to patient's primary care physician and/or general cardiologist and recommendation for CV risk optimization after initiation of ARPI therapy

Sponsors

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Following eligibility verification, randomization will occur in REDCap via the Randomization Module. Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to (A) cardio-oncology management guidelines-based care vs. (B) notification to their primary care physician and/or general cardiologist of ARPI therapy initiation and recommendation for CV risk optimization (control) using stratified block randomization. Refer to section 10.0 for stratification methodology.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
45 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Prostate cancer with localized, very-high risk, lymph-node positive, and/or metastatic (Stage IV) disease. * Being treated with ARPI therapy with intended duration ≥ 18 months. * Age \> 65 years old and at least one CV risk factor, or age 45-65 years with at least two CV risk factors: * Hypertension * Hyperlipidemia * Diabetes mellitus * Family history of early CAD (male first-degree relative (father or brother) with CAD before age 55; female first-degree relative (mother or sister) with CAD before age 65) * Presence of coronary artery calcium (CAC) on chest CT imaging * ECOG 0-2 * Written informed consent obtained from subject and ability for subject to comply with the requirements of the study.

Exclusion criteria

* Prior ARPI therapy exposure \> 6 months duration. * Established care with cardio-oncologist (cardiologist with expertise in CV risks of cancer and cardiotoxic cancer therapies).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Rate of any CV medication Initiation and/or Change3 Months Post-InterventionTo evaluate the rate of any CV medication initiation and/or change at 3-months following cardio-oncology consultation versus standard of care. Rate of any CV medication intervention at 3-months (Note: CV medication defined as: lipid-lowering, anti-hypertensive, anti-anginal, anti-platelet, anti-arrhythmic, heart failure medications)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Rate of Compliance with CV Therapeutic Medication Intervention6 and 12 Months Post InterventionTo determine the rate of compliance with CV therapeutic medication intervention at 6 and 12 months
Rate of Statin Intervetion3 Months Post InterventionTo determine the rate of statin intervention at 3 months
Rate of Compliance with Statin Medication Intervention6 and 12 Months Post InterventionTo determine the rate of compliance with statin medication intervention at 6 and 12 months
Rate of any CV Medication Intervention6 Months Post-InterventionTo determine the rate of any CV medication intervention at 6 months
Changes in Biological CV Risk Factor3, 6, and 12 Month Post-InterventionTo assess changes in biological CV risk factors (low density lipoprotein \[LDL\])
Rate of Coronary Artery Disease Testing3, 6, and 12 Month Post-InterventionTo determine the rate of coronary artery disease (CAD) testing (coronary CT angiograms, CAC scans, stress tests, and invasive coronary angiograms)
Rate of new CV or Cardiac Diagnosis3, 6, and 12 Month Post-InterventionTo determine the rate of new CV or cardiac diagnosis
One-Year MACE Rate12 Months Post-InterventionTo determine the one-year MACE rate
Rate of Grade ≥ 2 Cardiac CTCAE12 Month Post-InterventionTo determine one-year rate of grade ≥ 2 cardiac common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE)

Countries

United States

Contacts

CONTACTClinical Trial Recruitment Navigator
GroupCancerTrialInformation@cshs.org310-423-5842
CONTACTKatelyn Atkins, MD, PhD
katelyn.atkins@csmc.edu
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORKatelyn Atkins, MD, PhD

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORLeslie Ballas, MD

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 7, 2026