Skip to content

Real-World Effectiveness of Amniotic Membrane Allografts Versus Standard Wound Care in DFU, VLU, and PU

Real-World Effectiveness of Amniotic Membrane Allografts Versus Standard Wound Care in Chronic Wound Healing: A Multi-Site Study in Diabetic Foot Ulcers (DFU), Venous Leg Ulcers (VLU), and Pressure Ulcers (PU)

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07223281
Enrollment
2400
Registered
2025-10-31
Start date
2025-09-25
Completion date
2025-12-31
Last updated
2025-11-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetic Foot Ulcer (DFU), Pressure Ulcers, Bedsores, Decubitus Ulcer, Venous Leg Ulcers (VLUs)

Keywords

real world evidence, wound healing

Brief summary

This observational study will evaluate the real-world effectiveness of four amniotic membrane-based products (Zenith™, Orion™, SurGraft FT™, Complete ACA™) in addition to standard care, compared with standard care alone. The study will use complete electronic health records (EHR) from multiple wound care centers across the United States (2022-2025) to generate study data for product-treated and propensity score-matched standard care cohorts for each product-indication combination. The overall study comprises 12 parallel sub-studies (one for each product-wound type combination), each aiming to answer whether adding the product improves healing outcomes versus standard care alone in that indication. The primary endpoint is the proportion of wounds achieving complete closure within 12 weeks, with subgroup analyses by wound severity measures, age groups, and number of product applications. Secondary outcomes are time-to-healing, early wound improvement (≥50% reduction in wound area by 4 weeks), wound-related complications, and subgroup analyses.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Legacy Medical Consultants
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adults ≥18; DFU/VLU/PU; sufficient observable timeline

Exclusion criteria

* Use of other advanced wound products, atypical ulcer etiology (e.g., malignancy, vasculitis); insufficient follow-up

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Complete wound closure at 12 WeeksFrom index visit to 12 weeks post-indexProportion of index wounds with 100% epithelialization, no drainage or dressings; confirmation on ≥1 follow-up within 60 days

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to complete wound closureFrom index visit up to 24 months post-indexTime from the index visit to primary complete wound closure for wounds that heal during the study period
≥50% wound area reduction at 4 weeksFrom index visit to 4 weeks post-indexProportion of patients whose wounds close greater than 50% within 4 weeks from the index visit
Wound-related complicationsFrom index visit up to 24 months post-indexWound-related complications including infection requiring treatment, hospitalization, ED visits, and major or minor amputation

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026