Skip to content

Learning Amyloid and Tau Results

Reactions to Learning Amyloid and Tau Results in Adults at Risk for Alzheimer's Dementia

Status
Enrolling by invitation
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07222930
Enrollment
240
Registered
2025-10-30
Start date
2026-02-17
Completion date
2029-06-01
Last updated
2026-06-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Alzheimer Disease

Keywords

Amyloid, Tau, Alzheimer's Risk, dementia, biomarker testing, risk, pathophysiological changes, communication

Brief summary

This is a prospective, single-cohort, single-center, observational study to assess if learning one's Alzheimer's disease biomarker test result impacts longitudinal psychosocial, behavioral, and neuropsychological outcomes, and to identify factors that moderate and mediate these outcomes. Participants enrolled in this study are requested to complete surveys at four timepoints after learning their Alzheimer's biomarker test results.

Detailed description

The overall objective is to determine how learning one's amyloid and tau test results impacts longitudinal psychosocial, behavioral, and neuropsychological outcomes, and identify factors that moderate and mediate these outcomes. The rationale is that by understanding factors that explain variability in reactions, biomarker communication and post-testing support can be tailored to optimize outcomes. The central hypothesis is that learning biomarker profile will affect psychosocial, behavioral, and neuropsychological outcomes, and that these outcomes will be moderated by social determinants of health (SDOH) and perceived communication factors and mediated by illness perceptions and beliefs.

Interventions

OTHERDisclose amyloid, tau results

Release of results from investigational agents conducted under IND 107114, IND 166860, and IND 134516

self-report psychosocial and behavioral questionnaires

Sponsors

University of Wisconsin, Madison
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
45 Years to 89 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Willing to provide informed consent. * Willing to comply with all study procedures and be available for the duration of the study. * Individuals at least 45 years of age. * Enrolled in Wisconsin Registry for Alzheimer's Prevention (WRAP) or Alzheimer's Disease Research Center Clinical Core (ADRC) * Previously adjudicated as cognitively unimpaired having mild cognitive impairment (MCI), or impaired but do not meet diagnostic criteria for mild cognitive impairment or dementia (classified as "Impaired-Not MCI" by the WRAP and ADRC cohorts) at their last WRAP or ADRC study visit at the time of enrollment into this study * Have completed or able to complete amyloid and/or tau PET scans as part of a UW Alzheimer's Research Study

Exclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of dementia at the time of enrollment as determined by the most recent parent WRAP/ADRC study visit diagnostic consensus conference using standard NIA-AA 2011 diagnostic criteria. Participants who develop dementia after enrolling into this study may remain enrolled if they maintain decisional capacity and are able to follow study instructions and procedures. * Individuals who lack decisional capacity to provide informed consent as determined by significant difficulty in understanding materials and information about study procedures during recruitment and/or informed consent discussions. * Not suitable for study participation due to other reasons at the discretion of the investigators.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Impact of Neuroimaging in Alzheimer's Disease (INI-AD) Score1 month, 6 months, 12 months, 18 monthsTest-related distress will be assessed using the INI-AD instrument. Score range from 0-80 where higher scores indicate increased negative impact of test.
Stigma Impact Scale (SIS) Score1 month, 6 months, 12 months, 18 monthsItems are rated on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from strongly agree (4) to strongly disagree (1), and a fifth option of "not applicable" with higher total scores (24-96) indicating higher perceived stigma.
Control, Autonomy, Self-Realization, and Pleasure (CASP-12)baseline, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, 18 monthsThis is a quality of life measure scored from 0-36 where higher scores mean better quality of life.
Future Time Perspective Scalebaseline, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, 18 monthsScores are from 1-7 where higher scores indicate higher engagement.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Willingness to Prevent ADbaseline, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, 18 monthsWillingness to seek clinical evaluation about brain health and AD risk will be assessed by the Willingness to Prevent AD Scale, 12 items on a 5-point scale are scored from 12-60 where higher numbers indicate an increased willingness to prevent AD. A sum score (or projected/comparable sum score for participants who complete less than 12 items) for items answered will be calculated as the mean multiplied by the total number of available items, to be comparable between participants who answer a different number of items.
Willingness to Prevent AD: Over the counter, prescription, clinical trial itemsbaseline, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, 18 monthsWillingness to seek clinical evaluation about brain health and AD risk will also be assessed using 3 additional items added to the instrument, scored on a 5-point scale from 3-15 where higher numbers indicate an increased willingness to prevent AD.
Exercise Vital Sign Tool: Minutes per Week of Moderate or Vigorous Exercisebaseline, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, 18 monthsEngagement in health behaviors will in part be assessed using the exercise vital sign tool. This is self-reported as number of days per week and average minutes per day of moderate to vigorous exercise (like a brisk walk). The number of days per week is multiplied by average minutes per day to compute the outcome of minutes per week of moderate or vigorous physical activity. .
Cognitive & Leisure Activity Scale (CLAS)baseline, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, 18 monthsEngagement in health behaviors will in part be assessed by the CLAS scale, scored from 0-80 where higher scores means increased participation in cognitive and leisure activities.
6-item questionnaire for Mediterranean dietbaseline, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, 18 monthsEngagement in health behaviors will in part be assessed with the 6-item questionnaire for Mediterranean diet. Scores range from 0-6 with higher scores more closely resembling a Mediterranean dietary pattern.
Brief Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (B-PSQI)baseline, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, 18 monthsEngagement in health behaviors or willingness to engage in brain health behaviors, clinical trials, or treatments will in part be assessed using the B-PSQI, scored from 0-15 where higher scores indicate poorer sleep quality.
Number of Participants who Complete Advanced Directivesbaseline, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months
Clinical Trial Enrollmentbaseline, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, 18 monthsClinical trial enrollment will be assessed using an item from the Willingness to Prevent AD survey that inquires about willingness and actual enrollment in clinical trials. Answers include: "will not do", "have not considered", "considered, but have not decided", "ready, will do", and "already did".
Communication Assessment Tool (CAT) Score1 monthCommunication will be assessed at the 1-month follow-up timepoint using CAT, scored from 15 to 75 where higher scores indicate better reported communication.

Countries

United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORLindsay Clark, PhD

UW School of Medicine and Public Health

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 25, 2026