Skip to content

One vs. Two Stents for Gallbladder Disease

A Randomized Trial of One vs. Two Transpapillary Cystic Duct Stents to Prevent Recurrent Symptomatic Gallbladder Disease in Non-Cholecystectomy Candidates

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07222527
Enrollment
30
Registered
2025-10-30
Start date
2025-12-12
Completion date
2028-05-27
Last updated
2025-12-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Biliary Colic, Cholecystitis, Recurrent Cholecystitis, Symptomatic Gallbladder Disease

Keywords

gallbladder disease, symptomatic gallbladder disease, Recurrent cholecystitis, biliary colic, cystic duct stent, transpapillary gallbladder stents, high surgical risk patient, nonsurgical management gallbladder disease, gallbladder decompression, acute cholecystitis in non-cholecystectomy candidate

Brief summary

This randomized trial will look at whether placing two cystic duct stents is more effective than one cystic duct stent in preventing recurrent gallbladder disease (cholecystitis, gallstone pancreatitis, or biliary colic) among patients who are not immediate surgical candidates for removal of their gallbladder. The study will evaluate the safety profile, including rates of recurrent cholecystitis, biliary colic, and procedure-related complications, and technical success, defined as successful placement of stents into the gallbladder. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. Does placement of two transpapillary cystic duct stents reduce the risk of recurrent symptomatic gallbladder disease compared to one stent? 2. Is there a difference in procedure-related adverse events (post-ERCP pancreatitis, cholangitis, stent migration) between the two strategies? Researchers will compare outcomes between patients randomized to one stent versus two stents to determine which approach provides better long-term gallbladder drainage and fewer recurrent events. Participants will: Be evaluated for eligibility and provide informed consent prior to undergoing an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), an endoscopy where a guidewire is placed into the bile duct from the small intestine. They will then undergo ERCP with transpapillary cystic duct stent placement, randomized to one or two stents. All participants will receive standard post-procedure care and follow-up assessments for recurrence, adverse events, and need for reintervention.

Interventions

PROCEDUREERCP with one stent placement

One transpapillary cystic duct stent will be placed into the gallbladder via ERCP

PROCEDUREERCP with two stent placement

Two transpapillary cystic duct stents will be placed into the gallbladder via ERCP

Sponsors

Mayo Clinic
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 95 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Males or non-pregnant females presenting with cholecystitis, biliary colic or gallstone pancreatitis. 2. Age 18-95. 3. Participants must be willing and able to provide informed consent 4. Referred for ERCP for management of 1) suspected choledocholithiasis 2) acute biliary pancreatitis and/or 3) acute cholangitis in whom cholecystectomy is expected to be delayed \> 30 days or are deemed to not be surgical candidates for cholecystectomy.

Exclusion criteria

1. Inability to provide informed consent 2. History of surgically altered upper gastrointestinal anatomy (e.g. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, Billroth I/II) precluding standard ERCP 3. History of primary sclerosing cholangitis 4. History of gallbladder cancer 5. History of cholecystectomy 6. Unsuccessful biliary cannulation during ERCP -

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinical Success6 monthsDefined as absence of recurrence of symptomatic gallbladder disease (cholecystitis, gallstone pancreatitis, or biliary colic) at 6 months post-procedure.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Technical Success1 dayDefined as the ability to place the allocated number of transpapillary double pigtail stents into the gallbladder.
Time to Recurrence6 monthsThe amount of time (days) from the index procedure to when a recurrence occurs
Reintervention6 monthsThe proportion of participants who receive another endoscopic procedure due to failure/adverse events related to the index procedure
Adverse Events6 monthsThe type and severity of adverse events that occur related to the index procedure for stent placement

Countries

United States

Contacts

Primary ContactLiz Lemke
Lemke.Elizabeth@mayo.edu507-266-3317

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026