Sickle Cell Disease
Conditions
Keywords
Music Therapy
Brief summary
This research aims to see if songwriting can help reduce anxiety in adolescents with Sickle Cell Disease. The purpose of the study is to discover if participants find songwriting and playing their songs to be practical and acceptable, and helpful for managing anxiety.
Interventions
BEHAVIORALSongwriting intervention (active music therapy)
Participants will engage in a songwriting intervention with a music therapist.
Sponsors
Mayo Clinic
Study design
Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
11 Years to 18 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Adolescents aged 11-18 years of age at the time of enrollment and able to provide assent * Diagnosed with any type of sickle cell disease * Currently receiving care at pediatric center * Able to read and write in English
Exclusion criteria
* Care transitioned to adult facility * Visual, hearing, or cognitive impairment which may impede the ability to complete the songwriting intervention or data collection measures
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in State-Trait Anxiety Inventory score | Baseline, 3 months | The State and Trait Anxiety Inventory measures anxiety. Participants respond to 20 questions about how they are currently feeling on a 4-point Likert scale of 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much so). A total score is calculated by summing the item responses and ranges from 20 to 80. Higher scores indicate higher anxiety (a worse outcome) and lower scores indicate less anxiety (a better outcome). |
| Change in Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-A) score Change in Patient Health Questionnaire for Adolescents (PHQ-A) score | Baseline, 3 months | The Patient Health Questionnaire for Adolescents (PHQ-A) is a modified version of the PHQ-9 to be used with adolescents. Participants respond to 9 questions scored on a 4-point Likert scale of 0 (Not at all) to 3 (Nearly every day). A total score is calculated by summing the item responses and ranges from 0 to 27; higher scores are associated with higher levels of or more severe depression. |
| Change in Connor Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC 10) score | Baseline, 3 months | The Connor-Davidson Resilience scale (CD-RISC) measures resilience. Participants respond to 10 questions scored on a 5-point Likert scale of 0 (Not true at all) to 4 (True nearly all the time). A total score is calculated by summing the item responses and ranges from 0 to 40; with higher scores reflecting greater resilience. |
| Change in Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS-SF) score | Baseline, 3 months | The Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale Short Form (DERS-SF) measures difficulties in emotion regulation in adults and adolescents. It consists of six subscales: Nonacceptance, Goals, Impulse, Awareness, Strategies, and Clarity, each with three items. Participants respond to 18 questions scored on a 5-point Likert scale of 1 (Almost never) to 5 (Almost always). A total score is calculating by summing the item responses and ranges from 18 to 90; higher scores indicate greater difficulty with emotion regulation skills. |
| Change in PROMIS Pediatric Pain Behavior (SF-8a) score | Baseline, 3 months | The PROMIS Pediatric Pain Behavior (SF-8a) short form measures behaviors that typically indicate to others that an individual is experiencing pain. Participants respond to 8 questions scored on a 6-point Likert scale of 1 (Had no pain) to 6 (Almost always). A total score is calculated by summing the item responses and ranges from 8 to 48, with higher scores indicating a more pain related behavior. |
| Change in PROMIS Pediatric Pain Quality - Affective (SF-8a) score | Baseline, 3 months | The PROMIS Pediatric Pain Quality- Affective (SF-8a) short form assesses the emotional distress that accompanies pain. Participants respond to 8 yes or no questions (0 = no, 1 = yes). A total score is calculated by summing the item responses and ranges from 0 to 8, with higher scores indicating a greater impact of pain on emotional distress. |
| Change in PROMIS Pediatric Pain Quality - Sensory (SF-8a) score | Baseline, 3 months | The PROMIS Pediatric Pain Quality - Sensory (SF-8a) short form assesses the sensory experiences of pain. Participants respond to 8 questions scored on a 5-point Likert scale of 1 (Not at all) to 5 (Very much). A total score is calculated by summing the item responses and ranges from 8 to 40, with higher scores indicating participants experiencing increased sensory responses to pain. |
| Change in PROMIS Pediatric Physical Stress Experiences (SF-8a) score | Baseline, 3 months | The PROMIS Pediatric Physical Stress Experiences (SF-8a) short form assess the physically experienced sensations associated with pain. Participants respond to 8 questions scored on a 5-point Likert scale of 1 (Never) to 5 (Always). A total score is calculated by summing the item responses and ranges from 8 to 40, with higher scores indicating a greater impact of pain on physical stress experienced. |
| Change in PROMIS Pediatric Psychological Stress Experience (SF) score | Baseline, 3 months | The PROMIS Pediatric Psychological Stress Experience (SF) short form assesses the thoughts and feelings associated with pain. It measures facets of stress, including feeling overwhelmed, lack of perceived control, and cognitive-perceptual disruption, using a 7-day recall period. Participants respond to 8 questions scored on a 5-point Likert scale of 1 (Never) to 5 (Always). A total score is calculated by summing the item responses and ranges from 8 to 40, with higher scores indicating a greater impact of pain on psychological stress. |
| Change in PROMIS Pediatric Physical Activity (SF) score | Baseline, 3 months | The PROMIS Pediatric Physical Activity (SF) measure self-reported capability of physical activities. Participants respond to 8 questions scored on a 5-point Likert scale of 0 (No days) to 5 (6-7 days). A total score is calculated by summing item responses and ranges from 0 to 40, with higher scores indicating a greater deal of physical activity. |
Countries
United States
Contacts
CONTACTPam Peterson
CONTACTC. Robert Bennett
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORC. Robert Bennett, PhD
Mayo Clinic
Outcome results
None listed