Skip to content

Spinal Neurorehabilitation for Veterans With SCI

Identifying Residual Connectivity in Veterans With Spinal Cord Injury for Precision Neurorehabilitation

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07222046
Enrollment
40
Registered
2025-10-29
Start date
2026-08-31
Completion date
2031-06-30
Last updated
2026-09-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Spinal Cord Injuries

Keywords

Spinal neuromodulation, Transcutaneous stimulation, Spinal cord stimulation, Neuroanatomy, Neurorehabilitation

Brief summary

Chronic spinal cord injury (SCI) is a debilitating disorder in Veterans and the broader U.S. population that does not have a cure. Veterans with severe SCI demonstrate permanent loss of sensory and motor function below their injury resulting in decreased quality of life and independence. Recently, electrical spinal neuromodulation has emerged as a potential approach to restore voluntary motor function and locomotion in persons with chronic SCI. However, spinal neuromodulation has yet to translate to clinical use due to small sample sizes in research studies and a lack of information on which patients would benefit. Here, the investigators propose a novel approach to evaluate the priorities and barriers faced by Veterans with SCI to use spinal neuromodulation, understand the neural connections remaining in Veterans with severe SCI, and determine potential functional improvements using non-invasive spinal neuromodulation technology. This research represents the first step towards deploying techniques that could dramatically improve function and quality of life for Veterans with SCI.

Detailed description

The International Standards for Neurological Classification of SCI (ISNCSCI) exam is used to classify spinal cord injury (SCI) severity by determining the neurological injury level and functional completeness of SCI. However, anatomical, physiological, and functional studies have indicated that many participants with ISNCSCI-defined complete SCI retain connectivity through the SCI lesion. Due to the heterogeneity of SCI and the small-N in prior spinal neuromodulation studies, there are no diagnostic criteria to determine how SCI lesion profile affects the ability to restore sensorimotor function in the presence of spinal neuromodulation. Development of this knowledge is necessary to design precise spinal neuromodulation approaches and clinical trials that could restore function and improve quality of life for Veterans with chronic SCI. First, stakeholders will be engaged to define research priorities, meaningful outcomes, and barriers to participation in neuromodulation trials. The potential impact of neuromodulation and priorities of Veterans with SCI and their caretakers will be assessed across a nationwide survey. Spinal neuromodulation will be evaluated to determine how it could impact clinical practice and treatment of Veterans though survey of SCI physicians. Qualitative feedback will be obtained from Veterans with SCI regarding the expected and achieved outcomes with neuromodulation prior to and after undergoing functional neuromodulation experiments. Next, baseline anatomical and physiological connectivity measurements across ISNCSCI scores will be established. Veterans with SCI across INSCSCI grades will be recruited to determine residual spinal connectivity. Spinal cord anatomy will be assessed above, below, and at the SCI lesion through MR neuroimaging. Descending corticospinal connectivity will be evaluated with transcranial magnetic stimulation and ascending afferent signals will be evaluated through somatosensory evoked potentials. Finally, functional spinal connectivity during spinal neuromodulation will be evaluated. Volitional motor output will be assessed with and without non-invasive spinal neuromodulation. The sensory effects of spinal neuromodulation will be assessed through user reports of pain and somatosensation. Potential functional improvements in activities of daily living will be assessed with and without spinal neuromodulation.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTNeurophysiological and anatomical testing

All participants will undergo neurophysiological testing (transcranial magnetic stimulation and somatosensory evoked potentials) to determine residual neural connectivity. All participants will also undergo MRI of the spine to evaluate residual neural connections and changes above and below lesion. These values will be compared to the standard clinical evaluation of spinal cord injury (ISNCSCI exam).

All participants will undergo spinal neuromodulation through non-invasive transcutaneous spinal stimulation to determine the effects on voluntary motor function, sensation, and activities of daily living.

Sponsors

VA Office of Research and Development
Lead SponsorFED

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
NONE

Masking description

Due to the uniqueness of each injury, all staff will be aware of each participant's history. All participants will receive the same intervention.

Intervention model description

All participants will be Veterans with spinal cord injury to evaluate neurophysiological and functional effects of non-invasive spinal neuromodulation.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* All participants must be able to independently read and understand study information materials necessary to ensure informed consent * All participants must have a chronic spinal cord injury occurring \>1 year prior to study enrollment * Ability to follow simple commands in English

Exclusion criteria

* Contraindications to the use of external magnetic or electrical stimulation (e.g., epilepsy, intracranial metal, implanted electrosensitive device, etc.) * Significant neurological comorbidities that may affect neurophysiological recordings * Functional disability prior to spinal cord injury * Visual or auditory disorders limiting ability to participate in study procedures * Pregnancy * Primary psychiatric disorders or dissociative mental symptoms that impair informed consent * Significant chronic pain that may preclude an magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan or performing neurorehabilitation exercises * Frequent and significant spasticity that may preclude an MRI scan or neurorehabilitation exercises

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Axial completeness of chronic spinal cord injury (SCI) based on spine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)5 yearsSpared region volume at the injury site as assessed by spine MRI will be compared with clinical SCI score as measured by the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI) exam.
Sagittal completeness of chronic spinal cord injury (SCI) based on spine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)5 yearsIntramedullary lesion length will be measured via spine MRI and compared with clinical SCI score as measured by the ISCNSCI exam.
Presence of descending connections in chronic spinal cord injury based on transcranial magnetic stimulation5 yearsThe latency of transcranial magnetic stimulation pulses will be measured via electromyography and compared with clinical SCI score as measured by the ISCNSCI exam.
Presence of ascending connections in chronic spinal cord injury based on somatosensory evoked potentials.5 yearsThe latency of somatosensory evoked potential pulses will be measured via electromyography and compared with clinical SCI score as measured by the ISCNSCI exam.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Research priorities of Veteran spinal cord injury stakeholders2 yearsThe research priorities of Veterans with chronic spinal cord injury will be obtained and compared with previously published results in the non-Veteran population.
Voluntary motor function in the presence of non-invasive stimulation5 yearsIncreases in electromyography will be assessed with and without the use of non-invasive transcutaneous spinal stimulation.
Sensory responses in the presence of non-invasive stimulation5 yearsParticipants will self-report any changes in sensation during the application of non-invasive transcutaneous spinal stimulation.

Countries

United States

Contacts

CONTACTJonathan S Calvert, PhD MD
Jonathan.Calvert2@va.gov(916) 843-7512
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORJonathan S Calvert, PhD MD

VA Northern California Health Care System, Mather, CA

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 5, 2026