Skip to content

Evaluating a Mat-Based Biometric Vibration System for Sleep and Daily Recovery

Evaluating the Physiological and Psychological Impact of Low-Frequency Vibration Therapy: A Longitudinal Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07221318
Enrollment
50
Registered
2025-10-27
Start date
2025-10-06
Completion date
2026-05-31
Last updated
2025-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Healthy Adult Male and Female Volunteers

Keywords

whole-body vibration therapy, sleep quality, affect, mood, relaxation therapy

Brief summary

The goal of this randomized clinical trial is to learn whether a low-frequency kinetic wellness mat (a comfortable mat that gently vibrates) can improve stress recovery, sleep quality, mood, and attention in healthy adults ages 18-45. The main questions it aims to answer are: * After 3 weeks, does regular use of the vibrating mat increase heart rate variability (a noninvasive marker of the body's ability to recover from stress) and improve sleep, mood, perceived stress, and anxiety compared with no mat use? * Do patterns of resting brain activity (measured with EEG) and heart rate variability (HRV) change from before to after the program, and are those changes related to each other? Researchers will compare two groups: an Experimental group that uses the vibrating mat at home for 3 weeks, and a Control group that does not use the mat. Participants are randomly assigned to a group. Participants will: * Attend two lab visits (\ 60 min) for questionnaires, resting heart activity (HRV) and brain activity (EEG), and a brief attention test. * On 3-4 days per week for 3 weeks: * Experimental group: use the vibrating mat for 15 minutes while recording HRV. * Control group: lie quietly for 15 minutes while recording HRV. * Both groups: record HRV for 15 minutes before bedtime and 15 minutes after waking on those same days. * Both groups: complete quick check-ins on feelings (after sessions and the next morning) and log caffeine/alcohol, exercise, and medications.

Interventions

DEVICELow-frequency whole-body vibration mat

A noninvasive, horizontal mat that delivers low-frequency mechanical vibration (≈5-16 Hz; peak-to-peak amplitude ≤0.5 mm) while participants lie supine. The active arm uses the mat at home 15 min per session, 3-4 days/week for 3 weeks, preferably in the evening (2-3 h before bedtime). On intervention days, participants record HRV during the 15-min session and complete two additional 15-min HRV recordings (immediately before bedtime and after waking) to index short-term autonomic recovery. Brief affect check-ins (valence, arousal) and logs of caffeine/alcohol, exercise, and medications are completed on those days. Pre- and post-program lab visits include questionnaires plus resting HRV and EEG. The control arm follows the identical schedule without vibration. The device provides no heat or electrical stimulation.

Sponsors

Florida International University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 45 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Adults 18-45 years. * Able to provide written informed consent. * Apparently healthy and free of unstable cardiovascular, neurological, or psychiatric conditions per screening. * Cleared for low-to-moderate intensity whole-body vibration delivered supine/recumbent on a mat. * Willing and able to comply with study procedures: two lab visits; 3-week home protocol (3-4 days/week); three 15-min sessions; brief affect check-ins and daily logs. * Willing to abstain from caffeine, alcohol, and strenuous exercise for 24 hours before each lab visit and to attend visits at the same time of day. * Able to lie supine for 15 minutes and follow instructions for the HRV device.

Exclusion criteria

* Implanted electronic medical devices (e.g., pacemaker, neurostimulator). * Uncontrolled hypertension or severe vestibular disorders. * Current substance dependence. * Medications known to markedly affect autonomic function or sleep architecture (e.g., beta-blockers, antiarrhythmics, sedative-hypnotics, antidepressants with strong autonomic effects). * Diagnosed neurological or psychological disorders that substantially affect emotional processing or autonomic regulation (severe psychiatric conditions). * Prior extensive experience with vibration therapies (to minimize expectancy bias). * Any condition judged by study staff to contraindicate vibration exposure or preclude safe participation (including inability to tolerate supine/recumbent position). * Unwillingness to refrain from initiating new structured exercise or relaxation programs during the study period.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Resting vagally mediated HRVFrom enrollment to the end of treatment at 3 weeksHeart rate variability measured during a 15-minute, eyes-closed, supine rest in the lab. Inter-beat intervals captured with Optimal HRV; processed in Kubios (artifact correction; 4 Hz resampling; files with \>5% corrected beats excluded; spectral estimates with 300-s windows, 50% overlap). Outcomes reported as: * RMSSD (ms): Root mean square of successive differences. Higher = greater parasympathetic (vagal) activity. * HF power (0.15-0.40 Hz, ms²): High-frequency power. Higher = greater parasympathetic activity. Primary analysis compares change (Post - Baseline) between groups for each metric; an exploratory composite (mean of RMSSD and HF z-scores) may be reported to summarize parasympathetic tone.
Longitudinal HRV Response to InterventionSession days across Weeks 1-3RMSSD and HF recorded (i) during the 15-min home session (vibration vs quiet rest), (ii) 15 min before bedtime, and (iii) 15 min after waking. Outcomes are trajectories and group differences over time (linear mixed-effects). Benefit onset (threshold) will be explored via segmented regression/GAM change-point. Operational definition (pre-specified exploratory): first of two consecutive session-day recordings where RMSSD exceeds each participant's Baseline median by ≥0.10 log-units (\ 10% increase), sustained thereafter.
Resting EEG Spectral PowerFrom enrollment to the end of treatment at 3 weeksEyes-closed 15-minute, supine resting EEG using a 24-channel Smarting Mobi system. Preprocessing: 0.5-30 Hz band-pass, ocular SSP, ±100 µV artifact rejection, common-average reference; clean data segmented into 10-s epochs. Outcome is band power in Theta (4-8 Hz), Alpha (8-13 Hz), Beta (13-30 Hz), averaged across all electrodes and epochs (units: power; may be log-transformed for analysis). Higher values indicate stronger oscillatory activity in each band. Primary analysis compares Post-Baseline change between groups.
Resting EEG Directed ConnectivityFrom enrollment to the end of treatment at 3 weeksFrom the same 15-minute, eyes-closed, supine EEG. Frequency-domain Granger causality computed per 10-s epoch; spectra averaged within Theta (4-8 Hz), Alpha (8-13 Hz), Beta (13-30 Hz). Connectivity summarized across all electrodes via: (a) Global directed strength (mean of all non-diagonal influences; unitless; higher = stronger overall directed connectivity); (b) Nodal inflow and outflow (sum of incoming vs. outgoing influences for each electrode; unitless; higher = stronger received/sent influence); and (c) Pairwise directed influence (value for each electrode pair; unitless). Primary analysis compares Post-Baseline change between groups, with band-specific follow-ups.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cognitive Test (Trail Making Test)From enrollment to the end of treatment at 3 weeksTrail Making Test Part A and Part B completion times (seconds) nd error counts for each part. Errors include sequencing mistakes. Lower times and fewer errors indicate better performance. Primary metric: Change in TMT-B completion time and B-A (set-shifting cost) from Baseline to Post between groups, considering the amount of errors.
Mood States (Brunel Mood Scale)From enrollment to the end of treatment at 3 weeksBRUMS subscales scored 0-16 each. Higher = more of the construct (Tension, Fatigue); higher Vigor = more energy. Outcomes are changes in each subscale.
Sleep Quality (PSQI Global Score)From enrollment to the end of treatment at 3 weeksPittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (0-21). Higher scores = worse sleep quality. Outcome is change in global score; report also % with PSQI \>5 (poor sleep), if applicable.
Perceived Stress (PSQ Total Score)From enrollment to the end of treatment at 3 weeksPerceived Stress Questionnaire total (0-30). Higher scores = more perceived stress. Outcome is change in total score.
State Anxiety (6-Item STAI Short Form)From enrollment to the end of treatment at 3 weeksSix-item state anxiety scale (range 6-24). Higher scores = greater current anxiety. Outcome is change in total score.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Affective Check-ins (Self-Assessment Manikin)From enrollment to the end of treatment at 3 weeksValence and arousal rated 1-9 (single-item pictorial scales). Higher valence = more pleasant; higher arousal = more activated. Outcomes: pre-session levels and pre-session to morning change.
AdhereceFrom enrollment to the end of treatment at 3 weeksSession completion rate (% of prescribed sessions), missed-session streaks, and proportion of analyzable HRV/EEG files. Descriptive stats; between-group comparisons by t-test or Wilcoxon as appropriate.

Countries

United States

Contacts

Primary ContactMarcelo Bigliassi, PhD
marcelo.bigliassi@fiu.edu305-919-4256

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026