Skip to content

Biomarkers of Ocular Surface Damage in the Setting of Topical Ocular Hypotensive Medication Use

Biomarkers of Ocular Surface Damage in the Setting of Topical Ocular Hypotensive Medication Use

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07217678
Enrollment
20
Registered
2025-10-16
Start date
2026-02-09
Completion date
2028-01-31
Last updated
2026-03-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Glaucoma, Glaucoma Suspect, Ocular Hypertension, Open-Angle Glaucoma

Brief summary

The objective of this study is to evaluate whether reduction in topical medication with the injection of a sustained release capsule (Durysta) leads to a reduction in ocular surface inflammation, indicated by levels of caspase-1, an inflammatory biomarker.

Interventions

Participants in this arm will receive a one-time injection of Durysta (intracameral bimatoprost 10mcg). Participants will be followed by a total of 3 months.

Sponsors

University of Miami
Lead SponsorOTHER
AbbVie
CollaboratorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Eye with open-angle glaucoma or suspected of open-angle glaucoma * Pseudophakic in eye of interest with Shafer grading ≥3 * ≤ 3 daily applications of topical glaucoma medications for ≥6 months (of which one is a nightly preserved PGA) * Good adherence to medication regimen - screening questions to be asked of potential subject: * In the last month, what percentage of the time would you estimate missing the application of drops? (Must be ≤20%) * When was the last administration? (Last dose must have been within last 24 hours) * Presence of punctate epithelial erosions in the cornea (NEI scale \> 3)

Exclusion criteria

* Retinal disease (e.g., wet age-related macular degeneration, proliferative diabetic retinopathy, central retinal vein occlusion) * Use of topical or systemic immunosuppressor or immunomodulator drug (e.g., steroids, cyclosporine, lifitegrast, or antihistamines) * Use of preservative-free hypotensive medications * Any clinical contraindications to receiving intracameral bimatoprost implantation * History of recurrent conjunctivitis (e.g., allergic or atopic conjunctivitis) * History of partial or full corneal transplant * History of ophthalmic surgery (intraocular or tarsus-involving oculoplastic procedures) within last 6 months * History of subconjunctival glaucoma surgery (i.e., trabeculectomy, aqueous shunt, Xen implant) within last 6 months

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Caspase-1 mRNA Expression Following Durysta InjectionBaseline, post-injection 1 month, post-injection 3 monthsThe primary outcome is evaluating whether the level of caspase-1 from the ocular surface changes after the Durysta injection when the number of topical medications is reduced. Higher values indicate more inflammation, while lower values indicate less information and a more stable ocular surface. The Caspase-1 level will be measured using RT-PCR.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Corneal Sensitivity Following Durysta InjectionBaseline, post-injection 1 month, post-injection 3 monthsChange in corneal tactile sensitivity from measured using a non-contact esthesiometer (in sensitivity units). Greater sensitivity values indicate less ocular surface dysfunction; lower values reflect reduced sensitivity and potential surface.
Change in Ocular Pain Symptoms via Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Baseline, post-injection 1 month, post-injection 3 monthsChange in patient-reported ocular pain symptoms from post-Durysta injection, assessed using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS). VAS scores range from 1 to 10, where higher scores indicate more severe pain and lower scores reflect minimal discomfort.
Change in Corneal Staining Score Using the National Eye Institute (NEI) Grading SystemBaseline, post-injection 1 month, post-injection 3 monthsChange in corneal staining score post-Durysta injection, assessed using the National Eye Institute (NEI) grading system. This system evaluates five corneal regions-central, temporal, superior, nasal, and inferior-with each region scored from 0 to 3 based on fluorescein staining intensity. The total score ranges from 0 (no staining) to 15 (diffuse staining across all regions). Lower scores indicate improved ocular surface integrity and reduced epithelial damage; higher scores reflect more extensive surface compromise.

Countries

United States

Contacts

CONTACTJavier Paredes, BA, MBA
jxp2537@med.miami.edu305-326-6387
CONTACTMonica Arango, BA
mrarango@med.miami.edu305-326-6351
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORSwarup S Swaminathan, MD

University of Miami

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 6, 2026