Skip to content

Pre-Incision Peripheral Nerve Blocks for Lower Extremity Fracture Surgery in Older Adults

Pre-Incision Peripheral Nerve Blocks Versus No Peripheral Nerve Blocks for Lower Extremity Fracture Surgery in Older Adults: A Pilot Feasibility Study

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07217626
Enrollment
34
Registered
2025-10-16
Start date
2026-02-24
Completion date
2026-12-31
Last updated
2026-03-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lower Extremity Fracture, Orthogeriatric Fractures, Orthopaedic Trauma, Surgical Fracture Repair

Keywords

Regional Anesthesia, Clinical Outcomes, Orthopaedic trauma, Perioperative Outcomes, Pilot Study, Lower Extremity Fractures, Orthogeriatric Fractures, Peripheral Nerve Blocks

Brief summary

Fractures of the lower leg are especially difficult for older adults. They are more likely to have serious complications, require longer healing times, and have a higher risk of death This occurs because their bodies cannot tolerate stress as well as younger individuals. The injury itself places significant strain on the body, and surgery adds additional stress. Anesthesiologists use nerve blocks to help manage pain during and after these injuries. A nerve block is an injection that numbs the fracture and surgery area by blocking pain signals. These injections help patients need fewer opioid medications. However, new research shows these nerve blocks may provide benefits beyond pain management. Studies looking at older adults with hip fractures who received nerve blocks showed better overall outcomes: fewer deaths, fewer serious complications, and shorter hospital stays. However, it is not currently known if nerve blocks work this well for other broken bones in the leg, like in the thigh or shin. Additional research is need to know if nerve blocks can help patients with all types of leg fractures recover faster and experience fewer problems. Before the investigators start a large clinical trial, a small pilot study needs to be completed to determine if a larger clinical trial is feasible. This pilot study will evaluate the ability to recruit enough patients, ensure patients can receive the assigned treatment, collect data effectively, follow the study protocol, and track participants over time. The results will indicate whether the investigators are prepared to proceed with a full-scale trial and help refine the approach.

Detailed description

The potential for peripheral nerve blocks to improve clinical outcomes beyond analgesia is based on their ability to interrupt the physiologic stress response to surgical trauma near its origin. Tissue injury triggers nociceptive signals that travel through peripheral nerves to initiate a cascade of neuroendocrine and inflammatory responses, including the release of catecholamines, activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, and systemic inflammation. While younger patients can tolerate this stress response, older adults with limited physiologic reserve may experience organ dysfunction when these compensatory mechanisms become overwhelmed. By blocking afferent neural transmission before it reaches the central nervous system, peripheral nerve blocks may attenuate this cascade, potentially reducing sympathetic surge, myocardial oxygen demand, and the release of inflammatory mediators. Additionally, effective peripheral nerve blocks can reduce opioid requirements, avoiding adverse effects including respiratory depression, delirium, and impaired mobilization that particularly affect older adults. These mechanistic advantages may be especially important in older adults with lower extremity fractures, who face both the initial trauma and the additional physiologic burden of surgical repair. While peripheral nerve blocks are well-established components of multimodal analgesia, emerging evidence suggests their benefits may extend beyond short-term analgesic effects. Recent studies of older adults with hip fractures have found peripheral nerve blocks are associated with additional benefits including reduced mortality, fewer serious adverse events, and increased days alive out of hospital. However, evidence for fractures distal to the hip remains limited. Although current Orthopaedic Trauma Association guidelines recommend peripheral nerve blocks as part of multimodal pain management for hip fractures, time pressures, and uncertainty about benefits beyond short-term analgesia have resulted in variable adoption among anesthesiologists and orthopaedic surgeons. Evidence supporting broader use of peripheral nerve blocks for improving clinical outcomes in lower extremity fractures is still needed. To address this knowledge gap, a large multicenter randomized controlled trial is needed. However, prior to initiating such a trial, a pilot feasibility study will be conducted comparing pre-incision peripheral nerve blocks to no peripheral nerve blocks. The primary objective is to assess feasibility in terms of patient recruitment, adherence to treatment allocation, data collection methods, protocol compliance, and participant follow-up. This pilot phase will allow for refinement of the primary outcome measure, optimization of data collection procedures, establishment of recruitment rates, and identification of potential barriers to implementation before committing resources to a large-scale definitive trial.

Interventions

The peripheral nerve block should be performed within 2 hours before incision, either in the pre-operative holding area when called to the operating room or after positioning but prior to skin antisepsis in the operating room. The goal is to achieve an established neural blockade before surgical incision without delaying the surgical start time. All blocks must be performed using ultrasound guidance. Consistent with clinical practice, anesthesiologists will determine the appropriate balance between motor and sensory blockade based on patient factors, surgical approach, and clinical judgment.

Sponsors

University of Maryland, Baltimore
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Pilot Feasibility Study

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Age ≥50 years 2. Isolated fractures 3. Radiographically confirmed lower extremity fracture requiring surgical fixation including: 1. Femoral shaft 2. Distal femur 3. Patella 4. Proximal tibia 5. Tibial shaft 6. Distal Tibia 7. Pilon fractures 8. Ankle (malleolar fractures) 9. Calcaneus 10. Talus 11. Hindfoot/midfoot 4. Acute fracture receiving definitive fixation during injury hospitalization 4\) Ability to provide informed consent (patient or legally authorized representative (LAR))

Exclusion criteria

1. Contraindication to peripheral nerve block 1. Infection at planned needle insertion site 2. Patient refusal 3. Surgeon or anesthesiologist refusal secondary to the patient's medical status 2. Active peripheral nerve blockade from initial injury analgesic management is defined as: a. Risk of local anesthetic systemic toxicity 3. Neurologic or vascular injuries in the affected limb 4. Polytrauma with traumatic brain injury 5. Thoracic injury and/or abdominal injury requiring surgical intervention 6. Current enrollment in a conflicting clinical trial 7. Acute or Subacute residence prior to injury 8. Incarcerated at the time of enrollment 9. Prior enrollment in this trial 10. Unable to obtain informed consent due to language barrier 11. Unable to obtain informed consent because a legally authorized representative was unavailable. 12. Anticipated problems with follow-up compliance

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Feasibility of Participant Enrollment12 monthsParticipant enrollment will be assessed by monitoring screening and enrollment metrics, including: * Initiation of screening and recruitment at the clinical site * Ability of the clinical site to screen consecutive patients 50 years of age and older with lower extremity fractures * Proportion of patients who are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial * Proportion of patients who meet the eligibility criteria * Review of reasons for exclusion * Proportion of patients who provide informed consent * Length of time required to enroll up to 50 patients
Feasibility of Treatment Allocation12 monthsFeasibility of the treatment allocation will be assessed using the following metrics: * Proportion of adherence to pre-incision peripheral nerve block allocation * Proportion of adherence to no peripheral nerve block allocation * Proportion of stage 2 consent acceptance rate among participants randomized to peripheral nerve blocks
Refine Data Collection Methods12 monthsTo refine the data collection methods, the following metrics will be reviewed: * Proportion of participants with missing data * Proportion of missing data to identify data fields that are not feasible to collect * Proportion of data errors to identify ways to improve the flow of the case report forms (CRFs) and data collection
Assess Protocol ComplianceDay 30 + 5 post-randomizationThe following metrics will be used to assess compliance with the protocol: * Proportion of randomization errors * Proportion of participants who complete the 30-day follow-up phone call * Proportion of participants who withdraw from the trial (withdrawal of consent) * Proportion of participants who cannot be located (loss to follow-up)

Countries

United States

Contacts

CONTACTArissa Torrie, MD, MHS
ATorrie@som.umaryland.edu410 328 2630
CONTACTHeather Phipps, MPS
hphipps@som.umaryland.edu410-706-2492
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORArissa Torrie, MD, MHS

University of Maryland, Baltimore

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 31, 2026