Skip to content

Effectiveness Comparison of 3D-Printed and Conventional Ear Tip Comfort in Individuals With Hearing in the Normal Range

Effectiveness Comparison of 3D-Printed and Conventional Ear Tip Comfort in Individuals With Hearing in the Normal Range

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07216937
Enrollment
30
Registered
2025-10-15
Start date
2025-11-07
Completion date
2026-06-14
Last updated
2026-05-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

3D Printing, Hearing Aids

Keywords

hearing aids, 3D printing, hearing healthcare accessibility

Brief summary

Access to affordable and timely hearing healthcare remains a major challenge for many individuals, partly due to the high cost and long turnaround time. This study will explore whether 3D-printed ear tips perform as well as or better than standard ear tips in terms of sound quality, comfort, and fit. It will also compare how long each method takes to make and how much each costs.

Interventions

Hearing aids will be fit with three different types of customized ear tips. They will only wear each ear tip group for the duration of the test (total = 20 minutes). Hearing aids will be programmed to a simulated mild, flat, sensorineural hearing loss of 40 dB HL from 250-8000Hz. A short washout period will follow completion of testing with ear ear tip group.

Sponsors

University of Arizona
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 89 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Normal hearing thresholds (\<25 dB HL) at octave frequencies from 250-8000Hz. * Normal otoscopy: patent ear canals with normal appearing eardrums and aerated middle ear, bilaterally. * English speaking.

Exclusion criteria

* history of extensive or current outer or middle ear pathology. * history of extensive outer or middle ear surgery. * history of neurological or cognitive disorder.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Real Ear Measures2nd listening session appointment (15 minutes)Evaluation of ear canal acoustics with participant wearing a hearing aid and eartip type (3d party control, in-house\_Resin, in-house\_FlexResin). Then, a thin microphone tube is placed in the ear canal to measure the average amount gain (dB SPL) across various frequencies (250-8000Hz) while the participant sits in front of a speaker playing sound samples. Results are recorded in gain (dB SPL) across frequencies. Once complete, the eartip type is changed and recording is repeated until all eartip material types have been tested for each individual.
Outer EAR comfort questionnaire2nd listening session appointment (10 minutes)A validated questionnaire, Outer EAR, will be used to elicit patient perception of physical comfort, acoustic comfort, quality of voice, and overall self-perceived satisfaction. Includes 6 items (5 levels) , with 5 representing best possible function/rating.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
CostPrior to second listening session appointment (15 minutes)The total raw cost ($, dollars US)
TimePrior to second listening appointment (15 minutes)time-to-subject for each eartip type

Countries

United States

Contacts

CONTACTBryan Wong, AuD, PhD
bryanwong@arizona.edu520-626-8549

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 2, 2026