Skip to content

SORE Study: Sitz Baths After Urogynecologic Reconstruction

SORE Study: Sitz Baths After Urogynecologic Reconstruction

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07215780
Acronym
SORE
Enrollment
112
Registered
2025-10-14
Start date
2025-10-28
Completion date
2026-11-25
Last updated
2026-09-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gynecologic Surgeries, Pelvic Organ Prolapse, Postoperative Pain Management

Keywords

Pelvic organ prolapse surgical repair

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the utility of postoperative sitz baths in patient pain perception and recovery following surgical repair of prolapse. The SORE Study is a prospective, randomized controlled trial that aims to compare postoperative pain intensity one week after native tissue repair of pelvic organ prolapse for patients undergoing a sitz bath regimen versus usual care. Findings from this study may contribute to more robust, multimodal postoperative pain management plans if proven efficacious or, alternatively, reduce plastic medical waste and simplify postoperative pain plans if found to be ineffective.

Detailed description

The primary objective of the SORE study is to compare postoperative pain intensity one week after native tissue repair of pelvic organ prolapse for patients undergoing a sitz bath regimen versus usual care. The secondary objectives of this study are to evaluate patient satisfaction with pain management after native tissue prolapse repair (and specifically posterior repair and/or perineorrhaphy), patient-reported opioid requirements, healthcare utilization, postoperative pain plan adherence, and incisional healing and complications between those undergoing a sitz bath regimen versus usual care.

Interventions

DEVICESitz Bath

Warm water sitz bath, 7 nights, 10 minutes each

Sponsors

Yale University
Lead SponsorOTHER
American Urogynecologic Society
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

The study population will consist of adult patients undergoing native tissue surgical repair of pelvic organ prolapse at a Yale-affiliated hospital.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Female ≥ 18 years of age at time of surgery * English or Spanish-speaking * Documentation of pelvic organ prolapse as evidenced by Stage 2, 3, or 4 prolapse on preoperative Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification system (POP-Q) examination * Surgery to be performed by a urogynecologist * Ambulatory or inpatient surgery acceptable

Exclusion criteria

* Mesh-augmented prolapse repair (robotic, laparoscopic, or open sacrocolpopexy or sacrohysteropexy, vaginal mesh) * Urogynecologic surgery without prolapse repair (i.e. midurethral sling, intravesicular botox, hysterectomy only) * Suspected genital herpes simplex virus (HSV), molluscum contagiosum virus (MCV), condyloma acuminata, or vulvar/vaginal skin and soft tissue infection at recruitment by patient report * Daily opioid use (short or long-acting) * Concurrent non-urogynecologic surgery (i.e. rectopexy, staging or debulking for malignancy) * Lack of access to operative report * Pregnant (as determined by positive urine pregnancy test on the day of surgery via standard testing or current pregnancy documented in the preoperative note) * Incarcerated * Unable to give consent/conserved * Unable to complete study intervention or assessment per investigators

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Pain Intensity (PROMIS-PI) short form 3a questionnaireDay 7 Post surgeryPain intensity will be assessed on a 15-point scale evaluating current, worst, and average pain on postoperative day 7 following prolapse repair and converted to a T- score using general population data. Higher scores indicate increased pain intensity.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Sitz bath use- AdherenceDay 7 Post surgeryTotal use of sitz baths in minutes
Barriers to use- AdherenceDay 7 Post surgeryNumber of barriers to use perceived by self-report
Number of participants with rare adverse effectsDay 7 Post surgeryNumber of participants with any rare adverse effects per protocol
Mean Opioid useDay 7 Post surgeryMean number of requests for opioid refills postoperatively
Mean number of calls regarding painUp to Day 90 Post surgeryMean number of calls or messages for postoperative pain within 90 days of surgery via review of medical record
Mean number of Emergency Department visitsUp to Day 90 Post surgeryMean number of emergency department visits within 90 days of surgery via review of medical record
Comfort with postoperative pain planDay 7 Post surgeryParticipant comfort level with managing postoperative multimodal pain plan on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = very uncomfortable, 5 = very comfortable)
Mean score patient satisfactionDay 7 Post surgerySatisfaction with postoperative pain management on a 0-100 mm visual analog scale
Comfort with postoperative pain plan using Sitz bathDay 7 Post surgeryParticipant comfort with sitz bath setup and cleanup, accessibility to bathroom use, physical comfort during and after use of sitz bath on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = very uncomfortable, 5 = very comfortable)
Mean Oxycodone useDay 7 Post surgeryMean number of oxycodone tablets used postoperatively

Countries

United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORNancy Ringel, MD, MS

Yale University

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 9, 2026