Skip to content

Implementation of TBI-RECOVER in Substance Use Treatment

Facilitation as a Strategy for Implementing the Novel TBI-RECOVER Intervention Into Substance Use Treatment: A Mixed Methods Hybrid Type 2 Effectiveness-Implementation Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07215221
Acronym
TBI-RECOVER
Enrollment
900
Registered
2025-10-10
Start date
2026-04-28
Completion date
2030-03-30
Last updated
2026-07-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Substance Use Disorder (SUD), Traumatic Brain Injury

Keywords

hybrid type 2 effectiveness-implementation, traumatic brain injury, RE-AIM, organizational theory, implementation strategies, implementation mechanisms, substance use disorder treatment, hybrid type 2 trial, cognitive impairment, treatment mechanisms, outpatient substance use treatment

Brief summary

The goal of this hybrid type 2 pilot trial is to understand the implementation and effectiveness of the TBI-RECOVER intervention model (e.g., brain injury screening, cognitive and behavioral challenges screening, and neurocognitive accommodations) on patient retention in outpatient substance use disorder treatment. We will evaluate whether an implementation strategy bundle (e.g., training/education, champions, audit & feedback, facilitation) improves provider use and sustainability of the TBI-RECOVER intervention, and also whether the TBI-RECOVER intervention improves patient symptoms and treatment retention.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALTBI-RECOVER

The TBI-RECOVER intervention model consists of three components: 1) a web-based brain injury and cognitive impairment screener using the Online Brain Injury Screening and Support System (OBISSS) of the National Association of State Head Injury Administrators, 2) brief education and information on traumatic brain injury and substance use disorders, and 3) neurocognitive accommodations, or compensatory strategies, for neurological impairment.

BEHAVIORALControl

The control condition includes a brief information and educational sheet on traumatic brain injury and substance use disorder, how these two conditions are connected with each other, and a list of suggested accommodations they can use in treatment.

Sponsors

Ohio State University
Lead SponsorOTHER
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
CollaboratorNIH

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

The study will use a quasi-experimental design with a control and treatment group recruited at separate phases of the trial.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Patient Inclusion Criteria: * English-speaking; diagnosed with a substance use disorder; assigned to an outpatient provider for psychotherapy at the treatment clinic participating in the study. Patient

Exclusion criteria

* None Provider Inclusion Criteria: \- All providers employed in the outpatient treatment clinic who deliver psychotherapy are eligible (e.g., social workers, counselors, psychologists).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Treatment retention1 yearThe proportion of treatment sessions attended over one year.
BASIS-24 scores1 yearThe Behavior and Symptom Identification Scale (BASIS-24) measures six domains: (1) substance use, (2) impulsive/addictive behaviors, (3) relationships with self and others, (4) depression/anxiety, (5) daily living/role functioning, and (6) psychosis. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale, where 0 = lowest symptom severity and 4 = highest symptom severity. Subscales and the overall score are summed and then divided by the number of non-missing items for a total score. There are no clinical cut-offs.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient self-efficacy9 weeksThe General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES) will be used to measure self-efficacy. GSES is a 10-item measure of self-efficacy used in research for patients in treatment for SUDs. Items are measured on a 4-point Likert scale, where 1 = "Not at all true" and 4 = "Exactly true." Items are summed for a total score, with higher scores equating to greater self-efficacy. GSES has strong psychometric properties (α = .76 - .90). GSES will be measured at baseline (after informed consent), 3, 6, and 9 weeks.
Cognitive engagement in treatment9 weeksWe will use the Patient Expectation Questionnaire (CEQ), as well as single-item questions. CEQ is a 6-item questionnaire, with items measured on a 1 to 9, where 1 = "not at all logical" and 9 = "very logical." Questions 4 and 6 are rated on a 0-100% scale. Higher scores equal higher cognitive engagement. We will also ask the following single-item questions to measure cognitive engagement: "I understand the goals of my treatment;" "My therapists' approach to providing care will help me reach my goals." Cognitive engagement will be measured at baseline (after informed consent), 3, 6, and 9 weeks.
Satisfaction with treatment9 weeksWe will use the Treatment Perceptions Questionnaire (TPQ),(52) a 10-item measure of treatment satisfaction. Items measured on a 5-point Likert scale, where higher sum scores equal greater satisfaction with treatment. TPQ will be measured once at 9 weeks.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 8, 2026