Skip to content

Metformin Versus Chlorhexidine Gel as Adjuncts to Scaling and Root Planing in Stage II Grade B Periodontitis

Comparative Study Between Metformin and Chlorhexidine Gel as Adjunctive to Conventional Non-Surgical Treatment of Stage II Grade B Periodontitis: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07215156
Acronym
MET-CHX Perio
Enrollment
60
Registered
2025-10-10
Start date
2025-10-06
Completion date
2026-06-01
Last updated
2025-10-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Periodontitis, Stage II, Grade B Periodontitis

Keywords

Periodontitis, Stage II Grade B Periodontitis, Chronic Periodontitis, Scaling and Root Planing (SRP), Non-surgical Periodontal Therapy, Metformin Gel, Chlorhexidine Gel, Local Drug Delivery, Periodontal Regeneration, Inflammatory Markers (MMP-8)

Brief summary

This clinical trial is designed to evaluate two locally delivered gels, metformin and chlorhexidine, as adjunctive therapies to scaling and root planing (SRP) in patients with Stage II, Grade B periodontitis. Periodontitis is a chronic inflammatory condition that damages the supporting tissues of the teeth. Although SRP is the standard non-surgical treatment, it may not fully eliminate harmful bacteria or prevent disease recurrence. Chlorhexidine is a widely used antimicrobial gel, while metformin, a medication commonly prescribed for diabetes, has shown anti-inflammatory and bone-supportive effects when used locally in the gums. This study will directly compare the effectiveness of 1% metformin gel and 0.2% chlorhexidine gel, both applied subgingivally after SRP, against SRP alone. Sixty adult participants diagnosed with Stage II, Grade B periodontitis will be randomly assigned into three groups: SRP only (control), SRP plus metformin gel, and SRP plus chlorhexidine gel. Clinical outcomes (plaque index, gingival index, probing pocket depth, and clinical attachment level), inflammatory markers (MMP-8 in gingival crevicular fluid), and radiographic bone density will be measured at baseline, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months. The goal is to determine whether metformin gel or chlorhexidine gel provides superior improvements in periodontal healing when compared with SRP alone. Findings from this trial may guide evidence-based decisions on optimizing non-surgical periodontal therapy.

Detailed description

This is a randomized, controlled, single-blind clinical trial conducted at the Department of Oral Medicine, Periodontology, Oral Diagnosis, and Oral Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Kafrelsheikh University, Egypt. Sixty participants aged 18-60 years with Stage II, Grade B periodontitis will be enrolled. Participants will be randomly allocated (1:1:1) into three groups: Group A (Control): SRP only Group B (Test 1): SRP + 1% Metformin Gel Group C (Test 2): SRP + 0.2% Chlorhexidine Gel Subgingival gels will be applied after SRP using sterile syringes, followed by periodontal pack placement for one week. All patients will receive standardized oral hygiene instructions. Outcome Measures: Primary Outcomes: Clinical attachment level (CAL) changes, reduction in inflammatory markers (MMP-8), and radiographic bone density gain. Secondary Outcomes: Probing pocket depth (PPD), plaque index (PI), and gingival index (GI). Follow-up assessments will be performed at 1, 3, and 6 months. Data will be statistically analyzed using ANOVA and paired t-tests, with significance at p \< 0.05. The trial has been reviewed and approved by the Scientific Research Ethics Committee, Faculty of Dentistry, Kafrelsheikh University (Approval No. KFSIRB200-564, dated 24 February 2025).

Interventions

PROCEDUREArm 1 Scaling and Root Planing (SRP)

Full-mouth supragingival and subgingival debridement performed with ultrasonic and hand instruments (Gracey curettes). SRP performed to remove plaque and calculus and root-surface decontamination. Standardized oral hygiene instruction is provided after the procedure.

DRUGArm 2 Metformin Gel 1% (locally delivered)

1% metformin hydrochloride formulated in a gellan-gum gel base (as per protocol). After SRP, gel is delivered subgingivally with a sterile syringe (23-gauge cannula) and left undisturbed for approximately 5 minutes; a periodontal dressing is placed for one week. Gingival crevicular fluid sampling and clinical follow-up at 1, 3, and 6 months.

DRUGArm 3 Chlorhexidine Gel 0.2% (locally delivered)

0.2% chlorhexidine digluconate gel prepared in carbopol base. After SRP, gel is delivered subgingivally with a sterile syringe and left undisturbed for approximately 5 minutes; a periodontal dressing is placed for one week. Clinical follow-up at 1, 3, and 6 months.

Sponsors

Kafrelsheikh University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Masking description

Single-blind design: participants are blinded to intervention allocation; clinicians applying treatment are aware of the group assignment.

Intervention model description

Participants will be randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to one of three parallel groups: SRP alone, SRP + Metformin gel, or SRP + Chlorhexidine gel.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Adults aged 18-60 years. Diagnosis of Stage II, Grade B periodontitis. Probing pocket depths ≤ 5 mm with clinical attachment loss of 3-4 mm in selected sites. Generally healthy individuals without systemic conditions affecting periodontal health.

Exclusion criteria

Current smokers or users of tobacco products. Pregnant or lactating women. Known allergy to metformin or chlorhexidine. Use of antibiotics or anti-inflammatory drugs within the past 3 months. History of periodontal therapy within the past 6 months.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Gingival Crevicular Fluid MMP-8 LevelsBaseline, 1 month, and 3 monthsActive MMP-8 concentrations will be quantified in gingival crevicular fluid using ELISA. PerioPaper strips will be used for collection. Reduction in MMP-8 indicates decreased periodontal inflammation.
Change in Clinical Attachment Level (CAL)Baseline, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 monthsCAL will be measured from the cementoenamel junction to the base of the periodontal pocket using a UNC-15 probe. Improvement in CAL reflects periodontal tissue healing and attachment gain.
Change in Alveolar Bone DensityBaseline, 3 months, and 6 monthsStandardized periapical digital radiographs will be analyzed using Digora software to calculate mean gray-level values in the region of interest (1 mm below CEJ, 7 mm apically). An increase indicates bone density improvement.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Probing Pocket Depth (PPD)Baseline, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 monthsProbing depth will be measured at six sites per tooth using a UNC-15 probe. Reduction in pocket depth indicates clinical improvement in periodontal status.
Change in Gingival Index (GI) ScoreBaseline, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 monthsGingival inflammation will be assessed using the Löe and Silness Gingival Index. Decreased GI score reflects reduction in gingival inflammation.
Change in Plaque Index (PI) ScoreBaseline, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 monthsOral hygiene status will be evaluated using the Silness and Löe Plaque Index. Reduction in PI indicates improved plaque control.

Contacts

Primary ContactDuaa Luwai Hashim, B.D.S (2011) NRU
Doaaloai09@gmail.com+20 10 96329474

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026