Skip to content

A Clinical Trial to Compare the Safety and Performance of Two Different Curing Modes in the Direct Filling Therapy in Deciduous Teeth

A Multi-center, Randomized-controlled, 12-month, Split-mouth, Non-inferiority Clinical Trial to Compare the Safety and Performance of Two Different Curing Modes in the Direct Filling Therapy With a Flowable Bulk Fill Composite in Class I and II Deciduous Teeth

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07212660
Enrollment
70
Registered
2025-10-08
Start date
2025-12-18
Completion date
2027-10-01
Last updated
2026-03-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dental Caries, Insufficient Dental Filling

Brief summary

The overall aim of this clinical investigation is to assess the clinical performance and safety of composite restorations cured with fast curing mode (5 seconds with 2000 mW/cm²) in primary molars.

Detailed description

Dental interventions in young children are challenging due to limited compliance and anxiety. Moisture control during the placement of resin composite fillings is particularly difficult, as children need to remain calm. Reducing treatment time benefits both children and dentists. The planned clinical investigation aims to evaluate the clinical performance and safety of posterior restorations on primary teeth using a flowable composite with a fast curing mode (5 seconds, 2000 mW/cm²) compared to a conventional curing mode (10 seconds, 1200 mW/cm²).

Interventions

DEVICEFast curing mode

Composite restoration is cured with Turbo mode (5 seconds with 2000 mW/cm²).

DEVICEConventional curing mode

Composite restoration is cured with High mode (10 seconds with 1200 mW/cm²).

Sponsors

Ivoclar Vivadent AG
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

Split-mouth design: each patient receives 2 dental fillings (test and control treatment in the same patient)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
4 Years to 9 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Consent of a legal representative (usually parents) * 2 deciduous molars in the need of direct filling therapy class I and/or II in different quadrants (primary or secondary caries, filling loss) * Classification of caries: caries of all sizes in deciduous molars are included unless they can be treated with fissure sealing (ICDAS 3, 4, 5) * Sufficient language skills of legal representative and children * Teeth in the need of indirect pulp capping if necessary (Operator decision)

Exclusion criteria

* Cognitive impairment not age-appropriate * Sensitive tooth (pain at night, irritation-persistent pain, buccal swelling, percussion sensitivity) * Teeth with severely resorbed roots (anormal tooth mobility) * Direct pulp capping * Pulpotomy of an adjacent tooth in the same appointment * Noncompliant child * Allergies to material or anaesthetics used in the study * Sufficient isolation not possible

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Postoperative pain4-10 days after placement of the dental fillingsThe assessment of postoperative pain will be done by using the Wong-Baker Faces Pain rating Scale and includes questions about type and duration of pain, intensity of pain and the type of stimulus causing the pain. Values of 0 and 2 in the Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale are considered as no pain and values \>2 as pain.

Countries

Switzerland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 26, 2026