Arthropathy of Knee, Knee Arthroplasty, Total, Robotic Assisted Arthroplasty
Conditions
Keywords
Robotic, Arthroplasty
Brief summary
To evaluate whether patients undergoing robotic-assisted TKA achieve better clinical-functional, radiological, and satisfaction outcomes compared with those undergoing the conventional technique, and whether operative time and complications do not increase significantly
Detailed description
To compare clinical, functional, quality-of-life, and radiological outcomes between robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RA-TKA) and conventional total knee arthroplasty (C-TKA).
Interventions
PROCEDUREConventional total knee replacement
Knee replacement without robotic technology
PROCEDURERobotic TKR
Total knee replacement WITH robotic technology
Sponsors
Hospital de Terrassa
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
54 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Patients with knee arthropaty recquiring TKR
Exclusion criteria
* Cognitive disease * Deformity greater than 15º of varus or 10º of valgus * Postraumatic arthritis * Inflamatory disease * Other than Persona PS implant design * Previus surgery
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| IKDC | 2 years follow up after surgery | standardized international system for documenting and evaluating knee problems. The IKDC Subjective Knee Form is a patient-reported outcome measure that was developed to assess both surgical and non-surgical outcomes across a wide range of knee conditions and treatment approaches. |
Countries
Spain
Outcome results
None listed