Skip to content

Effectiveness of Intraseptal Anesthesia for Periodontal Surgical Procedures

Effectiveness of Intraseptal Anesthesia for Periodontal Surgical Procedures

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07212270
Enrollment
60
Registered
2025-10-08
Start date
2025-09-22
Completion date
2026-06-01
Last updated
2026-05-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gingivitis and Periodontal Diseases, Periodontitis

Brief summary

The primary aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of intraseptal anesthesia using 0.3 mL of 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine (4% Ar+Ep) for periodontal flap surgery in patients with periodontitis and for gingivectomy/ gingivoplasty for the excision of hyperplastic gingival enlargements. The secondary aim is to compare clinical anesthetic parameters between the ISA and conventional anesthesia techniques.

Detailed description

In the test groups every patient is going to receive injections of 0.3 mL of 4% articaine with 1: 100,000 epinephrine (ORABLOC ® , 40 mg/ml Articaine + 0.01 mg/ml Epinephrine, PIERREL S.P.A, Capua, Italy), with a computer controlled anesthesia delivery system (Anaeject®, Septodont, Sallanches, France). In the control groups all surgical procedures is going to be performed under infiltration anesthesia, as commonly used in periodontal surgery. The success rate and the anesthetic field widths is going to be recorded by pinprick testing. The pain levels will be recorded using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for the administration of anesthesia, during the surgical procedure and after the intervention.

Interventions

Open flap debridement with intra-sulcular incisions or flaps with para-marginal incisions were performed by lifting the mucoperiosteal flap and debriding the periodontal defect under visual control.

PROCEDUREgingivectomy and gingivoplasty

surgical methods for the excision of hyperplastically enlarged gingiva.

Sponsors

University of Belgrade
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Caregiver)

Masking description

Periodontist do not know the type of anesthesia given by the investigator

Intervention model description

2 parallel groups, each with the experimental and the control group

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* age ≥18 years good systemic health * gingivitis or periodontitis stage II and III * at least 20 teeth present.

Exclusion criteria

* allergy to 4%Ar+Ep * pregnant or lactating females * medication uptake and diseases affecting the periodontal tissues * acute pain, swelling, and presence of gingival lesions.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The anesthetic efficacy5 min after injectionThe absence of pain for two pinprick tests in a row.
The width of the anesthetic field on the buccal side5 min after injectionmaximal distance between the two painless needle's pricks on the buccal aspect of attached gingiva
The width of the anesthetic field on oral side5 min after injectionThe maximal distance between the two painless needle's pricks on the oral aspect of the attached gingiva.
VASaimmediately after anesthetic administrationThe intensity of pain measured on 100mm Visual Analogue Scale, where 0 represented no pain and 100 the worst pain imaginable.
VASiat the end of the treatmentThe intensity of pain measured on 100mm Visual Analogue Scale, where 0 represented no pain and 100 the worst pain imaginable.
VASpone day follow-upThe intensity of pain measured on 100mm Visual Analogue Scale, where 0 represented no pain and 100 the worst pain imaginable.
The durationform start to finish od interventionThe duration of intervention, measured in minutes.

Countries

Serbia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 6, 2026