Skip to content

Freezing in Parkinson's Disease

The Effect of Visual and Auditory Cueing Walker on Gait in Individuals With Parkinson's Disease Experiencing Freezing of Gait

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07212205
Acronym
parkinson
Enrollment
30
Registered
2025-10-08
Start date
2023-06-10
Completion date
2023-12-10
Last updated
2025-10-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Parkinson Disease

Keywords

Auditory and Visual cue, Gait, Parkinson's disease, Walker

Brief summary

The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of a visual and auditory cueing walker on freezing of gait during walking in patients with Parkinson's disease (PDF), compared to Parkinson patients without freezing of gait (PDNF).Sample size was calculated to detect a difference of 0.37 m/sec on mean velocity, with a deviation of 0.3 m/sec, two-sided 5% significance level, and power of 90%. Considering the expected 10% dropout rate, twelve subjects were included.Researcher R1 determined whether the subject was eligible for inclusion in the trial and researcher R2 carried out the gait analysis. Both examiners were unaware of group allocation. An independent researcher (R3) performed the clinical evaluation before the procedures started. Participants walked back and forth on a 7-meter walking path under two different conditions: without cues and with a walker providing visual and auditory cues. To assess the risk of falls in both groups, the "Tinetti Balance and Gait Assessment" was conducted. Additionally, the "Dynamic Gait Index" was used to evaluate the ability to adapt walking to varying task demands, and the Timed Up and Go Test (TUGT) was employed to determine walking speed.

Detailed description

This study suggests that a walker providing visual and auditory cues may improve daily walking in patients with Parkinson's disease with freezing of gait (PDF) and reduce the risk of falls in patients with Parkinson's disease without freezing of gait (PDNF) who exhibit hypokinetic gait patterns.

Interventions

OTHERVisual & Auditory Cueing Walker

Intervention Name: Visual & Auditory Cueing Walker Other Intervention Names (varsa): Cueing Walker Walker with Visual & Auditory Cues Intervention Description: Participants in this arm were assessed under two within-subject conditions: walking on a 7-meter path without cues (control condition) and walking on the same path using a visual and auditory cueing walker (intervention condition). Each participant completed both conditions in a single session. Pre- and post-walking evaluations were conducted for walking speed (Timed Up and Go Test), fall risk (Tinetti Balance and Gait Assessment), and gait adaptation (Dynamic Gait Index). The 'no cues' condition represents a repeated-measures control within the same arm. Participants were included based on the presence of freezing of gait. Planned Enrollment: 18

Sponsors

Necmettin Erbakan University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Arm 1: PDF (Parkinson's Disease with Freezing of Gait) Intervention: Visual & Auditory Cueing Walker Description: Participants were assessed under two within-subject conditions: walking without cues and walking with a visual & auditory cueing walker. Arm 2: PDNF (Parkinson's Disease without Freezing of Gait) Intervention: Visual & Auditory Cueing Walker Description: Participants were assessed under two within-subject conditions: walking without cues and walking with a visual & auditory cueing walker. This is a non-randomized interventional study with two parallel groups (PDF and PDNF). Each participant was assessed under two within-subject conditions: walking without cues and walking with a visual and auditory cueing walker. The two conditions are repeated measures within each arm

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Those with a Hoehn-Yahr classification between 2.5 and 4 were included in the study. \-

Exclusion criteria

Patients with secondary parkinsonism, severe systemic diseases, psychiatric illness, cognitive impairment (Mini-Mental State Examination score <24), hearing and vision loss, musculoskeletal problems, or symptoms suggestive of cerebellar dysfunction were excluded from the study. \-

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Gait AdaptationImmediately after walking with the visual and auditory cueing walker test was completedDynamic Gait Index: Time taken by the participant to complete the 7-meter walking path under each condition (without cues and with visual & auditory cueing walker), measured using the Timed Up and Go Test (TUGT).

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026