Circulatory Failure, Hypovolemia, Shock
Conditions
Keywords
Shock, Hypovolemia, Emergency department, Central venous pressure, Fliud resuscitation, Ultrasound guided IVC
Brief summary
This study aims to compare ultrasound-guided inferior vena cava (IVC) assessment with central venous pressure (CVP) monitoring for the detection of hypovolemia in shock patients in the emergency department. The primary objective is to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility of IVC collapsibility index compared to CVP values in both early and post-resuscitation phases. The study will prospectively enroll shock patients, collect demographic and clinical data, and analyze the correlation between IVC and CVP measurements to determine their role in guiding fluid resuscitation and hemodynamic management.
Detailed description
Hypovolemia is a major contributor to morbidity and mortality among patients presenting with shock in the emergency department. Early recognition and accurate assessment of intravascular volume status are essential for effective resuscitation. Central venous pressure (CVP) monitoring has traditionally been used but is invasive and may not always accurately reflect volume status. Ultrasound-guided inferior vena cava (IVC) assessment offers a non-invasive alternative, with the IVC collapsibility index shown to correlate with volume responsiveness. This prospective observational study will enroll patients diagnosed with shock and compare IVC measurements with CVP values during both early presentation and post-resuscitation phases. The findings are expected to provide evidence on the diagnostic agreement between IVC ultrasound and CVP monitoring, potentially supporting the use of IVC ultrasound as a rapid, reliable, and less invasive tool for guiding fluid therapy in emergency settings.
Interventions
DEVICEUltrasound-Guided Inferior Vena Cava Assessment
This intervention involves bedside ultrasound measurement of the inferior vena cava (IVC) diameter and calculation of the IVC collapsibility/distensibility index. Assessments will be performed both at initial presentation and after fluid resuscitation in shock patients. The procedure is non-invasive, rapid, and performed according to standardized emergency ultrasound protocols, distinguishing it from invasive monitoring methods.
Sponsors
Assiut University
Study design
Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
1- Adult patients aged ≥18 years. 2.Both male and female patients will be included in the study. 3. Presentation to the Emergency Department with clinical evidence of shock, defined by: Hypotension (systolic blood pressure \<90 mmHg or mean arterial pressure \<65 mmHg). Evidence of tissue hypoperfusion (e.g., altered mental status, cold extremities, or oliguria). Elevated serum lactate (\>2 mmol/L). 4. Shock attributed to hypovolemic, septic, or hemorrhagic etiologies. 5. Patients requiring fluid resuscitation and hemodynamic monitoring.
Exclusion criteria
1 - Patients younger than 18 years. 2. Pregnancy. 3.Cardiogenic or obstructive shock (e.g., cardiac tamponade, massive pulmonary embolism, or tension pneumothorax). 4.Known inferior vena cava (IVC) anomalies (e.g., congenital absence, thrombosis). 5\. Increased intra-abdominal pressure or severe ascites. 6. Morbid obesity (BMI ≥40 kg/m²) or any condition interfering with adequate IVC ultrasound visualization. 7\. Prior central venous catheterization performed before Emergency Department arrival. 8\. Congestive heart failure (CHF) with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF \<40%) or pulmonary hypertension. 9\. Refusal of the patient or legal guardian to participate in the study.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Correlation Between IVC Collapsibility Index and Central Venous Pressure | IVC assessment will be performed at presentation and 1 hour post-resuscitation, while CVP will be monitored continuously during the first 6 hours after ED admission. | The primary outcome is to assess the diagnostic agreement between ultrasound-guided inferior vena cava (IVC) collapsibility index and central venous pressure (CVP) values in detecting hypovolemia among shock patients in the emergency department. Measurements will be collected at two time points: during early presentation and after initial fluid resuscitation. The outcome will be evaluated by analyzing correlation coefficients, sensitivity, and specificity of IVC measurements compared with CVP |
Countries
Egypt
Contacts
Primary ContactMahmoud Ahmed Mohamed Abd Elgwad, M.B.B.Ch
Outcome results
None listed