Skip to content

Tensi+ European Registry

Tensi+ European Registry

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07205445
Enrollment
500
Registered
2025-10-03
Start date
2025-02-27
Completion date
2027-10-01
Last updated
2025-10-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Overactive Bladder

Keywords

Urology, TENS, Overactive bladder

Brief summary

Tensi+ (Stimuli Technology, Boulogne Billancourt, France) is a newly released, medical transcutaneous-posterior tibial nerve stimulation (TC-pTNS) device marketed for overactive bladder (OAB) management. Preliminary studies have shown a favorable safety and efficacy profile. The goal of the present registry is to collect data among an important number of patients to assess the efficacy, safety and potential predictive factors of success in a current clinical setting over a total period of 1 year.

Interventions

DEVICETensi+

Tensi+ (Stimuli Technology, Boulogne Billancourt, France) is a newly released, medical transcutaneous-posterior tibial nerve stimulation (TC-pTNS) device marketed for overactive bladder (OAB) management.

Sponsors

Stimuli Technology
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age ≥ 18 years * Patients suffering from idiopathic or neurological overactive bladder

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with pacemaker, defibrillator, or any other electronic implant; * Patients with metal implant near the stimulation area; * Pregnant women; * People suffering from ankle joint problems, swollen ankles or a dermatological condition or damaged skin in the area where the electrodes are to be placed; * Patient with cognitive impairment; * Inability to complete a voiding diary; * No social security cover (for applicable countries).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Subjective improvement3 and 12 monthsThe Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) uses a 7-point scale, where post-treatment condition is rated as follows: 1. = Very much better 2. = Much better 3. = A little better 4. = No change 5. = A little worse 6. = Much worse 7. = Very much worse. For analysis, patients with a PGI-I score of 1, 2, or 3 are typically considered responders, reflecting meaningful improvement.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient-reported Outcomes Measures (PROMs)0; 3 and 12 monthsUrinary symptoms by filling up International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Female Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (ICIQ-FLUTS) which is a questionnaire intended to assess female storage, voiding and incontinence symptoms. Lower scores are typically associated with reduced symptom severity.
Quality of life measures0; 3 and 12 monthsBy filling up International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - OAB quality of life (ICIQ-OABqol) which is a questionnaire evaluating quality of life in patients with overactive bladder. Lower scores are typically associated with improved quality of life.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Evaluation of nocturia0; 3 and 12 monthsEvaluation of nocturia episodes averaged over three days from bladder diary entries
Patient-reported Outcomes Measures (PROMs)0; 3 and 12 monthsBy filling up International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Bowel (ICIQ-B) which is a questionnaire for evaluating symptoms of anal incontinence. Lower scores are typically associated with reduced symptom severity.
Evaluation of adverse events3 and 12 monthsPatients will be asked whether they experienced any adverse events during treatment. Patient responses will be collected and described qualitatively, enabling the identification of the types of adverse events reported as well as the frequency of their occurrence.
Evaluation of urgency urinary incontinence0; 3 and 12 monthsEvaluation of urgency urinary incontinence episodes averaged over three days from bladder diary entries
Evaluation of voiding frequency0; 3 and 12 monthsEvaluation of daytime voiding frequency averaged over three days from bladder diary entries
Evaluation of urgency0; 3 and 12 monthsEvaluation of daily urgency episodes averaged over three days from bladder diary entries

Countries

France, Italy, United Kingdom

Contacts

Primary ContactAkshaya Mariadassou
a.mariadassou@stimuli-technology.com+331 84 60 48 25
Backup ContactSarah Todeschini
s.todeschini@stimuli-technology.com+331 84 60 48 25

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026