Skip to content

Validation Study: Extended Wear Performance of the Zio Monitor - SHASTA II

Validation Study: Extended Wear Performance of the Zio Monitor - SHASTA II

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07205367
Enrollment
150
Registered
2025-10-03
Start date
2025-01-06
Completion date
2025-11-07
Last updated
2026-08-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cardiac Arrhythmia

Brief summary

This trial assesses the wear performance of the Zio monitor, a long-term continuous ambulatory patch ECG monitor, in a representative population by evaluating (1) the wear duration (up to 30 days) of the device, (2) the percentage of analyzable electrocardiographic time and (3) safety by reviewing all adverse events.

Detailed description

This is a prospective, multi-center, single-arm study to validate the design of the Zio monitor/Zio MCT device form factor in extended (21-day) wear when utilizing an updated skin prep process. The trial is conducted in 2 phases. Phase I includes the standard skin preparation process of 40 strokes with an exfoliator in 4 different directions. Phase II incorporates a modified skin preparation process: only 20 strokes with an exfoliator in 2 directions are used. There are 75 participants in each phase. Performance objectives include the following: (1) Mean wear duration of 21 days and (2) percent analyzable time of 80%. Safety measures include the proportion of participants that experience clinically significant skin irritation through 30 days of wear, as well as the reporting of all adverse events. Additional device measures include the following: (1) % signal artifact (defined as the proportion of ECG signal that is artifact over the wear duration, reported for each study device); (2) % device functionality (defined as the proportion of Zio monitors recording a continuous ECG signal through 21 days, and through 30 days) and (3) observational assessment of participant skin types (assessed by dryness levels, hyperhydrosis status, Fitzpatrick Skin Type and chest hair density). All analyses will be performed on the population of enrolled participants on whom the Zio monitor application was attempted. The age, sex at birth, and application type (i.e., healthcare provider (HCP) designee vs. self-application) of participants will be monitored throughout the enrollment period to ensure representation across key user groups. Performance within subgroups including (but not limited to) sex at birth, age, and application type will be assessed. Seventy-five (75) participants in Phase I and 75 participants in Phase II will be enrolled at 2 US iRhythm locations (San Francisco, CA and Deerfield, IL). There are 3 on-location visits at Baseline (Visit 1/time of patch application), Day 21 (Visit 4) and Day 30 (Visit 5/following 30 days of patch application). There are 2 telephone/video calls at Day 7 (Visit 2) and Day 14 (Visit 3). Participants who meet all inclusion criteria and no exclusion criteria will be enrolled.

Interventions

The Zio monitor is a long-term continuous ambulatory patch ECG monitor which adheres to the patient's left pectoral region.

Sponsors

iRhythm Technologies, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

This is a design validation study to evaluate the wear performance of the Zio monitor/Zio MCT device form factor.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Participant must be 18 years or older at time of informed consent. 2. Participant is willing and able to provide informed consent and be able to complete all visits for the study.

Exclusion criteria

1. Participant has a known allergy to adhesives. 2. Participant has a current skin infection or injury at location for study device placement. 3. Participant is a member of a vulnerable population. 4. Participant is a current or prior employee of iRhythm. 5. Participant is unable or unwilling to participate or comply with study protocol. 6. The local Investigator deems the participant has a condition that could limit the participant's ability or willingness to participate in the study, or ability to comply with study required procedures and/or follow-up visits. 7. Participant has experienced symptomatic episodes where instance variations in cardiac performance could result in immediate danger to the participant. 8. Participant has an external cardiac defibrillator or may be exposed to high frequency surgical equipment near strong magnetic fields or devices such as MRI during the wear period. 9. Participant has a neuro-stimulator, as it may disrupt the quality of ECG data. 10. Participant does not have the competency to wear the device for the prescribed monitoring period. 11. Participant does not have the ability to consent for themselves (i.e., no LARs).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Wear Duration21 - 30 days after baselineThis outcome measure is met if the mean wear duration is greater than 21 days
Percent Analyzable TimeUp to 30 days (Day 30)This outcome measure is met if the percent analyzable time is greater than 80% in 90% of subjects.
Safety: Skin IrritationUp to 30 days (Day 30)This includes the proportion of participants that experience clinically significant skin irritation through 30 days of wear. This will be assessed through the capture and reporting of all adverse events.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Additional Device Measure 1: Signal ArtifactUp to 30 days (Day 30)Percent signal artifact is defined as the proportion of ECG signal that is artifact over the wear duration, reported for each study device. Signal artifact is a continuous value representing the percentage of the wear duration that was not interpretable. This variable will be calculated as the inverse of analyzable ECG percent. Signal artifact will be summarized using the population meeting protocol requirements and include means and 95% confidence intervals for these proportions.
Additional Device Measure 2: Device FunctionalityAt 21 days (Day 21) and 30 days (Day 30)Device functionality is defined as the number of participants with Zio monitors recording a continuous ECG signal through 21 and 30 days. The ability to record a continuous ECG signal is defined as device functionality. Device functionality will be determined by the number of participants with devices adhering to the skin, the number of participants with devices functioning/operating and the number of participants with devices that are recording and ECG signal.
Observational Assessment: Skin Dryness LevelBaseline (Day 1)This includes an assessment of the following skin types: dry, oily and normal.
Observational Assessment: Hyperhydrosis StatusBaseline (Day 1)This includes an assessment of the following hyperhydrosis status: primary, secondary or none.
Observational Assessment: Fitzpatrick Skin TypeBaseline (Day 1)This includes a 6-point scale to assess the following skin types: (1) pale skin; always burns, never tans; (2) fair skin; usually burns, tans minimally; (3) darker white skin; sometimes mild burn, tans uniformly; (4) light brown skin; burns minimally, always tans well; (5) brown skin; very rarely burns; tans very easily; (6) dark brown or black skin; never burns.
Observational Assessment: Chest Hair DensityBaseline (Day 1)This includes an assessment of the following chest hair density types: smooth/no hair; some hair; moderately hairy; or very hairy in the target patch placement area.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This trial had 2 phases; 75 participants were in each phase. An external vendor conducted recruitment 02Dec24 - 31Jan25 for Phase I & 07May25 - 06Jun25 for Phase II. The same recruitment methods (IRB-approved email solicitation & social media posting) were used for each phase. A study population representative of the intended Zio monitor use & those who met eligibility criteria were approached. Enrolled participants were seen at 1 of 2 Sponsor locations (San Francisco, CA or Deerfield, IL).

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic
Age, Customized
Age
18 - 50 years
30 Participants
Age, Customized
Age
51 - 70 years
72 Participants
Age, Customized
Age
> 70 years
44 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity
Hispanic or Latino
5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity
Not Hispanic or Latino
130 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Patch Application Method
Health Care Provider or Designee
50 Participants
Patch Application Method
Self Application
52 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race
Asian
20 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race
Black or African American
9 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race
More than one race
3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race
White
51 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
146 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Sex
Female
34 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Sex
Male
35 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 750 / 75
other
Total, other adverse events
45 / 7552 / 75
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 750 / 75

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 6, 2026