Skip to content

Towards Efficient Personalization of Computerized Lower Limb Prostheses Via Reinforcement Learning in a Clinical Setup - Group 1

Towards Efficient Personalization of Computerized Lower Limb Prostheses Via Reinforcement Learning in a Clinical Setup - Patient Study

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07204925
Enrollment
24
Registered
2025-10-02
Start date
2025-08-01
Completion date
2029-11-01
Last updated
2026-05-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Transfemoral Amputation

Keywords

Powered prosthesis legs, control parameter personalization, reinforcement learning

Brief summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to understand the feasibility and effectiveness of using reinforcement learning to personalize robotic prosthetic legs (an experimental prototype) for unilateral transfemoral amputees. The main questions it aims to answer are: * With the developed RL-based Recommendation Interfacing System (RISE), clinicians are able to personalize prosthetic legs faster compared with existing manual personalization procedures. * With the developed RL-based Recommendation Interfacing System (RISE), clinicians are able to personalize prosthetic legs without detailed knowledge about how the prosthetic legs are controlled. * Patients perform better when the prosthetic legs are personalized with RISE system compared with the ones personalized manually Researchers will compare two arms (RISE guided personalization and manual personalization) to see if the tuning speed will increase and if patients can perform better. Participants will go through the standard prosthetic fitting procedures, such as alignment adjustment, then they will experience repeated prosthesis personalization procedures conducted by tuning specialists without RISE, tuning specialists with RISE, and prosthetists (without tuning expertise) with RISE on different types of terrains. In the end, the participants will go through a testing trial, in which they will experience the prototype personalized through the three different approaches without knowing how the control parameters are decided. Their walking performance will be recorded. It is expected that the participants will visit the testing site 8 times, which including alignment (1 visit), three personalization procedures (twice for each), and one testing trial (1-2 visits).

Interventions

DEVICERISE guided personalization of prosthetic legs by tuning experts

The personalization procedure is conducted by tuning experts based on the recommendation of RISE system

DEVICERISE guided personalization of prosthetic legs by prosthetists

The control parameters of the prosthetic leg prototype is decided by prosthetists without detailed knowledge about the prosthetic leg with the help of developed RISE system

DEVICEManual personalization of the prosthetic leg by tuning experts

The control parameters of the prosthetic legs are decided by tuning experts based on their knowledge of the prosthetic leg prototypes and patients' response.

Sponsors

North Carolina State University
Lead SponsorOTHER
Arizona State University
CollaboratorOTHER
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
DEVICE_FEASIBILITY
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

During the evaluation trial, the participants and evaluators are blinded on how the personalized parameters are decided.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Unilateral transfemoral amputees between 18-75 with K level three or higher * More than one year after amputation * Using current prosthetic socket and leg for more than three months * No major skin issues on the residual limb for more than six months * Can walk for more than 4 minutes continuously without any other assistive devices

Exclusion criteria

* Have very short residual thighs (the length of the residual limb is \<15% of the length of the unimpaired limb) * Are \<1.50m in height or \>116Kg in weight (who would not fit our prosthesis or the PowerKnee) * Have cognitive, visual, audio impairments that would affect their ability to give informed consent or to follow simple Instructions during the experiments * Have any significant co-morbidity that interferes with the study (e.g. stroke, pacemaker placement, pain, etc.).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Total personalization timeDuring the visit arranged for personalizationTime needed to finish the personalization of the prosthetic leg

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Walking speedDuring the last visit for evaluationThe walking speed of the participants when the prosthetic leg is personalized using one of the three personalization procedures
Step lengthDuring the last visit for evaluationLength of step when the participant walking with the prosthetic leg, of which control parameters are decided by one of the three personalization approaches.
foot elevationduring the last visit for evaluationMaximum height of the foot during swing when the control parameters of the prosthetic legs are decided by one of the three personalization procedures

Countries

United States

Contacts

CONTACTMing Liu, PhD
mliu10@ncsu.edu9195158541
CONTACTLaura Rohrbaugh, BS
lasmith6@ncsu.edu919-513-3840
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORHe (Helen) Huang, PhD

NC State University

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 20, 2026