Skip to content

A Physical Activity Program for People With Heart Failure

A Step-Based Physical Activity Intervention in Patients With Heart Failure: The STEP-IN Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Enrolling by invitation
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07204834
Acronym
STEP-IN
Enrollment
200
Registered
2025-10-02
Start date
2025-10-08
Completion date
2028-12-31
Last updated
2025-11-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Heart Failure

Keywords

Exercise, Physical activity, Step, Cadence, Cardiovascular disease, Heart-brain, 6-minute walk test, Walking, Wearable, Fitbit

Brief summary

STEP-IN is a research study that examines the effects of a physical activity program designed to increase the daily steps and cadence of patients with heart failure, compared to standard medical care, on functional capacity and other markers related to heart and brain health. The primary hypothesis is that participating in the physical activity program for 9 months will improve functional capacity, the primary clinical measure, significantly more than receiving only the standard medical care in people with heart failure. It is also hypothesized that the physical activity program will have positive effects on symptoms and limitations related to heart failure, inflammation, as well as heart and brain health.

Detailed description

Heart failure is associated with disabling symptoms of dyspnea, fatigue, low exercise tolerance, and frequent hospitalizations. Managing heart failure is challenging, as it often coexists with several comorbidities related to cardiovascular- and brain-health (e.g., hypertension, dyslipidemia, cognitive impairment). Physical activity programs represent a promising adjuvant to pharmacological treatments to improve patients' functional capacity, reduce their symptoms, and facilitate long-term physical activity maintenance as patients' exercise tolerance improves. However, few patients with heart failure attend and adhere to traditional structured exercise programs such as cardiac rehabilitation. In response, the overall objective of STEP-IN is to design and test the effectiveness, feasibility and safety of a real-world, individualized step-based physical activity intervention to improve functional capacity, heart failure symptoms and limitations, systemic inflammation and additional heart-brain outcomes in patients with heart failure. STEP-IN is a two-arm, single-blind multicenter randomized controlled trial. A total of 200 adults with heart failure with reduced (≤40%) or mildly reduced ejection fraction (41-49%) and a II or III NYHA functional class will be enrolled. Participants will be randomized 1:1 to a 9-month step-based physical activity intervention or enhanced usual care. The intervention will leverage wearable devices and a personalized online platform alongside behavior change methods to progressively increase participants' daily step count (volume) and step cadence (intensity), with increments individually planned every 2 weeks. To test the effectiveness of the program all participants will undergo several evaluations at baseline, and 3, 9 and 12 months after randomization, with the main timepoint of interest being from baseline to 9-month follow-up.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALPhysical Activity

Participants will be encouraged to progressively increase the number of daily steps (volume) and the number of minutes per day spent at a higher cadence (intensity). To achieve these goals, the investigators will support participants in the intervention group through behavior change techniques. For example, wearable devices and an online platform will be used to monitor the behavior and track progress using simple graphs; participants will be provided with small, individualized goals which will be updated every two weeks based on the activity levels achieved the prior two weeks; standardized WhatsApp messages will be sent to prompt the behavior and face-to-face coaching sessions will be delivered throughout the intervention. Participants in this group will also receive enhanced usual care, consisting of the usual care to manage heart failure plus an education pamphlet and in-depth evaluations and reports to measure the project outcomes.

Sponsors

Department of Physical Education and Sports, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Sport and Health University Research Institute (iMUDS), University of Granada, Spain
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
University Hospital Virgen de las Nieves
CollaboratorOTHER
Hospital Universitario Clínico San Cecilio
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Hospital Santa Ana de Motril
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Mind, Brain and Behaviour Research Centre (CIMCYC)
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición (CIBEROBN), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Spain
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Department of Medical BioSciences, Exercise Physiology ResearchGroup, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria IBS Granada
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Universidad de Granada
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Given the nature of the intervention, participants cannot be blinded to their assigned group. Staff conducting the evaluations will be blinded to the participants' allocation group. Staff conducting statistical analyses for the main outcomes will also be blinded.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, HFrEF, i.e., left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40%, or mildly reduced ejection fraction, HFmrEF, i.e., left ventricular ejection fraction 41-49%, confirmed with an echocardiography showing HFrEF or HFmrEF in the last 6 months and having reached stable medication titration (highest tolerated dose) for ≥1 month * Functional class New York Heart Association (NYHA) II or III, confirmed by the clinical staff * Age ≥18 years old

Exclusion criteria

* Signs or symptoms of decompensated heart failure in the last month * Uncontrolled arrhythmia * Limiting angina (grade III or IV) * Severe symptomatic aortic stenosis * Persistent symptomatic hypotension * In the last 3 months: myocardial infarction, revascularization procedure (i.e., percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary artery bypass graft) or insertion of a cardiac device (e.g., implantable cardioverter defibrillator, bi-ventricular pacemaker) * Comorbid diagnosed conditions that either contraindicate physical activity or may adversely impact adherence to trial procedures, such as active malignancy, major depression or other significant psychiatric disorders, dementia, or significant hearing or visual impairment * Inability to walk independently (i.e., requires assistive devices for ambulation) * Already participates in a clinical trial or plans to participate in other interventions that could affect this trial, such as cardiac rehabilitation, during the study period * Both the participant and caregiver are unable to access a smartphone or internet, or have null technology literacy (i.e., unable to use WhatsApp or a simple Web page)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in functional capacityBaseline, 3 months, 9 months and 12 monthsThe primary outcome is the change in functional capacity measured with a 6-minute walk test (6MWT).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in systemic inflammationBaseline and 9 monthsMeasured with blood-based high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP). Unit: mg/L.
Change in additional pro- and anti-inflammatory markersBaseline and 9 monthsAdditional pro- and anti-inflammatory markers will be measured from a blood sample, e.g., Interleukin-6 (IL-6), Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha (TNF-α), Interleukin-1 beta (IL-1β), Interleukin-10 (IL-10), and Interleukin-1 Receptor Antagonist (IL-RA), including novel inflammatory biomarkers that may become available up to the time of analysis. Unit: pg/mL.
Change in counts of stepsBaseline, 3 months, 9 months (within the last 2 weeks of the intervention) and 12 monthsMeasured with a StepWatch accelerometer as the total counts of steps/day.
Change in patient-perceived heart failure-related symptoms and limitationsBaseline, 3 months, 9 months and 12 monthsMeasured with the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire - Clinical Summary Scale (KCCQ-CSS). This is scored on a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better heart failure-related health status (i.e., fewer symptoms and less physical limitation); 0 reflects the worst and 100 the best status.
Change in peak cadenceBaseline, 3 months, 9 months (within the last 2 weeks of the intervention) and 12 monthsMeasured with a StepWatch accelerometer as the minute with the higher number of steps.
Change in 24-hour movement behaviorsBaseline, 3 months, 9 months (within the last 2 weeks of the intervention) and 12 monthsPhysical activity (primary behavior of interest), sedentary, and sleep metrics measured with a Matrix Activity Monitor .
Change in time spent at light, moderate and vigorous-intensity step cadenceBaseline, 3 months, 9 months (within the last 2 weeks of the intervention) and 12 monthsMeasured with a StepWatch accelerometer as minutes/day spent at light, moderate (main interest) and vigorous-intensity step cadence.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in brain shapesBaseline and 9 monthsMeasured with magnetic resonance imaging using a T1-weighted Magnetization-Prepared Rapid Acquisition Gradient Echo (MPRAGE) structural sequence. This outcome will be assessed only in participants without MRI incompatibilities.
Change in white matter microstructureBaseline and 9 monthsWhite matter microstructure will be assessed using diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging, with metrics including mean diffusivity, fractional anisotropy, and tractography-derived measures. This outcome will be assessed only in participants without MRI incompatibilities
Change in white matter hyperintensitiesBaseline and 9 monthsWhite matter lesions identified as white matter hyperintensities using 3D T2-weighted Turbo Spin Echo (TSE) Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery (FLAIR) magnetic resonance imaging. This outcome will be assessed only in participants without MRI incompatibilities
Change in cerebral blood flowBaseline and 9 monthsCerebral blood flow measured with magnetic resonance imaging using the technique of TGSE-pCASL (turbo gradient spin echo-pseudo continuous arterial spin labeling). This outcome will be assessed only in participants without MRI incompatibilities
Change in blood-brain barrier permeabilityBaseline and 9 monthsBlood Brain Barrier permeability measured by calculating the water exchange rate across the blood-brain barrier using 3D diffusion-prepared arterial spin labelled perfusion magnetic resonance imaging. This outcome will be assessed only in participants without MRI incompatibilities
Change in frailty scoreBaseline and 9 monthsFrailty score calculated using the Fried Frailty Scale. This scale characterizes frailty as the presence of at least three of the following five components: unintentional weight loss, self-reported exhaustion, weakness (grip strength), slow walking speed, and low physical activity. Each component in which the participant meets the frailty criterion is scored as 1. Otherwise, it is scored as 0. The scores from the five criteria are summed up to obtain a final score, which is then used to classify the participant according to the following thresholds: Frail: ≥3 criteria present. Prefrail: 1-2 criteria. Robust: 0 criteria
Change in anxiety symptomsBaseline and 9 monthsReported by participants with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. The anxiety subscale has 7 items. Each item is rated on a 4-point scale (0-3 points). The total anxiety scores range from 0-21 points. Higher scores mean worse anxiety symptoms.
Change in depression symptomsBaseline and 9 monthsReported by participants with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. The depression subscale has 7 items. Each item is rated on a 4-point scale (0-3 points). The total depression scores range from 0-21 points. Higher scores mean worse depression symptoms.
Change in cardiovascular health scoreBaseline and 9 monthsCardiovascular health score calculated using the total score of Life's Essential 8, and the sub-scores related to health factors and behaviors. The health factors include body mass index, blood lipids, blood glucose and blood pressure. Health behaviors consider physical activity, diet, nicotine exposure and sleep health. It yields a cardiovascular health score based on the unweighted average of all components, ranging from 0 to 100 points. A higher score means better cardiovascular health.
Change in subjective memory declineBaseline and 9 monthsReported by participants with the Subjective Memory Decline Scale. It consists of four items assessing self-experienced increasing difficulties in everyday memory, yielding a total score ranging from 0 to 8. Higher scores indicate greater perceived memory decline.
Change in stressBaseline and 9 monthsReported by participants with the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS). It consists of 14 items with a five-point response format. A higher score corresponds to a higher level of perceived stress.
Change in lonelinessBaseline and 9 monthsReported by participants with the UCLA Loneliness Scale. Items are rated using a 4-point Likert-type scale. Total scores range from 10 to 40, with higher scores indicating greater loneliness.
Change in social supportBaseline and 9 monthsReported by participants with the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support. The MSPSS is a 12-item self-administered questionnaire that evaluates perceived support from three distinct sources: family, friends, and significant other. Each item is rated on a 7-point Likert scale, with higher scores indicating greater perceived support.
Change in self-esteemBaseline and 9 monthsReported by participants with the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. It is a 10-item self-report questionnaire that assesses global self-esteem by capturing individuals' overall sense of self-worth and self-acceptance. Items are rated on a 4-point Likert scale. Total scores range from 10 to 40, with higher scores indicating greater self-esteem.
Change in independence in basic activities of daily livingBaseline and 9 monthsAssessed by a trained health professional, through an interview with the participant, using the Barthel Index. The scale has 10 items covering basic activities of daily living (feeding, bathing, groomig, dressing, continence, toilet use, transfers, mobility and stairs). The total score ranges from 0 to 100 points. Higher scores indicate greater independence in basic activities of daily living.
Change in independence in instrumental activities of daily livingBaseline and 9 monthsAssessed by a trained health professional, through an interview with the participant, using the Lawton and Brody Scale. The scale has 8 items covering instrumental activities of daily living (ability to use the telephone, shopping, food preparation, housekeeping, laundry, mode of transportation, responsibility for own medication, ability to handle finances). Each item is scored dichotomously (independent = 1, dependent = 0). The total score ranges from 0 to 8 points. Higher scores indicate greater independence in instrumental ADL.
Change in clinical-related measuresBaseline and 9 monthsNYHA category defined by a clinician (I-IV, higher categories denote worse symptoms and limitations), medication prescription
Participants' physical activity enjoyment during the interventionDuring the 9-month interventionAt the end of every month of the intervention, participants will be asked to rate their physical activity enjoyment using a short version of the Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale (PACES). Higher scores indicate greater enjoyment. This will be assessed only in participants in the intervention group.
Participants' rating of perceived exertion during the interventionDuring the 9-month interventionEvery two weeks during the intervention, participants will be asked to rate their perceived exertion, thinking about when they were performing step-based physical activities, using the 6-20 Borg scale. Higher scores indicate greater exertion. This will be assessed only in participants in the intervention group.
Adherence to and compliance with the interventionDuring the 9-month interventionMeasured based on participants' attendance to the coaching sessions, use of Fitbit and achievement of the goals. These will be assessed only in participants in the intervention group
Rate of clinical events during the studyDuring the study period until the 12-month follow-upBased on the incidence of clinical events during the study, i.e., during the 9-month intervention and during the 3-month follow-up (12 months after randomization), including worsening heart failure, hospitalization (cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular related), major adverse cardiovascular events and mortality.
Rate of long-term clinical outcomesAfter study completion, an average of 5 and 10 yearsIncidence of clinical events 5 and 10 years after the completion of the study, including hospitalization (cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular related), major adverse cardiovascular events and mortality. This will be measured using structural funds from the research team.
Cost-effectivenessAfter study completion, an average of 1 yearMeasured based on analyses of cost-effectiveness. This will be measured using structural funds from the research team.
Social Return on InvestmentAfter study completion, an average of 1 yearMeasured based on analyses of Social Return on Investment (SROI). This will be measured using structural funds from the research team.
Change in natriuretic peptidesBaseline and 9 monthsMeasured with peripheral blood-based biomarkers such as N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP). Unit: pg/dL.
Change in neurotrophic & growth factorsBaseline and 9 monthsMeasured with peripheral blood-based biomarkers such as Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF). Unit: pg/dL.
Change in cholesterol profileBaseline and 9 monthsMeasured with peripheral blood-based biomarkers such as total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, Triglycerides. Unit: mg/dL.
Change in glucose profileBaseline and 9 monthsMeasured with peripheral blood-based biomarkers such as Fasting Plasma Glucose. Unit: mg/dL.
Change in glycated hemoglobinBaseline and 9 monthsMeasured with peripheral blood-based glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c). Unit: %.
Change in estimated GFRBaseline and 9 monthsEstimated as the Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR). Unit: mL/min/1.73 m²
Change in markers of renal functionBaseline and 9 monthsMeasured with peripheral blood-based creatinine and urea nitrogen (BUN). Unit: mg/dL.
Change in uric acidBaseline and 9 monthsMeasured with peripheral blood-based Uric acid. Unit: mg/dL.
Change in markers of liver functionBaseline and 9 monthsMeasured with peripheral blood-based Aspartate aminotransferase, Alanine aminotransferase, Gamma-glutamyl transferase, Alkaline phosphatase, Lactate dehydrogenase, Creatine kinase. Unit: U/L.
Change in total bilirubinBaseline and 9 monthsMeasured with peripheral blood-based Total bilirubin. Unit: mg/dL.
Change in thyrotropinBaseline and 9 monthsMeasured with peripheral blood-based Thyrotropin (TSH). Unit: mIU/L.
Change in parathyroid hormoneBaseline and 9 monthsMeasured with peripheral blood-based Parathyroid hormone (PTH, intact). Unit: pg/mL.
Change in markers of coagulationBaseline and 9 monthsMeasured with peripheral blood-based prothrombin time, and activated partial thromboplastin time. Unit: seconds
Change in fibrinogenBaseline and 9 monthsMeasured with peripheral blood-based fibrinogen. Unit: mg/dL
Change in electrolytesBaseline and 9 monthsMeasured with peripheral blood-based sodium, potassium, chloride. Unit: mmol/L.
Change in mineralsBaseline and 9 monthsMeasured with peripheral blood-based calcium, phosphorus, magnesium. Unit: mg/dL
Change in protein statusBaseline and 9 monthsMeasured with peripheral blood-based albumin and total protein. Unit: g/dL
Change in CA 125Baseline and 9 monthsMeasured with peripheral blood-based Cancer Antigen 125 (CA 125). Unit: U/mL
Change in ironBaseline and 9 monthsMeasured with peripheral blood-based iron. Unit: µg/dL
Change in transferrinBaseline and 9 monthsMeasured with peripheral blood-based transferrin. Unit: mg/dL
Change in transferrin saturationBaseline and 9 monthsMeasured with transferrin saturation index. Unit: %.
Change in FerritinBaseline and 9 monthsMeasured with peripheral blood-based Ferritin. Unit: ng/mL.
Change in Vitamin DBaseline and 9 monthsMeasured with peripheral blood-based Vitamin D (25 OH). Unit: ng/mL
Change in plasma phosphorylated tau 217 (p-tau217)Baseline and 9 monthsMeasured with blood-based p-tau217. Unit: pg/mL
Change in plasma phosphorylated tau 181 (p-tau181)Baseline and 9 monthsMeasured with blood-based p-tau181. Unit: pg/mL
Change in plasma Aβ42/40 ratioBaseline and 9 monthsMeasured with blood-based amyloid-β 42 to 40 ratio.
Change in plasma neurofilament light (NfL)Baseline and 9 monthsMeasured with blood-based neurofilament light. Unit: pg/mL
Change in additional novel blood-based biomarkers related to heart and brain healthBaseline and 9 monthsThe investigators will remain open to assessing novel blood-based biomarkers related to heart and brain health that may become available in the literature up to the time of analysis
Change in handgrip strengthBaseline and 9 monthsMaximal handgrip strength measured at rest using a handheld dynamometer. Higher values indicate better strength. Unit: kg.
Change in 30-second chair stand repetitionsBaseline and 9 monthsNumber of full stands completed in 30 seconds from a standard chair without using arms. Higher values indicate better lower-body function. Unit: repetitions (count).
Change in usual gait speedBaseline and 9 monthsUsual-pace gait speed measured over a 4.57-meter course from a standing start. Unit: second (m/s).
Change in resting systolic blood pressureBaseline and 9 monthsMeasured with an automated blood pressure monitor (OMRON). Unit: mmHg.
Change in resting diastolic blood pressureBaseline and 9 monthsMeasured with an automated blood pressure monitor (OMRON). Unit: mmHg.
Change in resting heart rateBaseline and 9 monthsMeasured with an automated blood pressure monitor (OMRON). Unit: beats per minute.
Change in body mass indexBaseline and 9 monthsBody mass will be measured using a SECA scale, height will be measured using a SECA height measuring system, body mass index will then be calculated (kg/m2).
Change in waist circumferenceBaseline and 9 monthsMeasured following standardized procedures with a Lufkin tape measure. Unit: cm.
Changes in biventricular functionBaseline and 9 monthsMeasured using resting ultrasound echocardiography with markers such as 2D and 3D ejection fraction, deformation measures, and additional right-ventricular indices. Due to logistic constraints, this outcome will only be assessed in participants recruited from the hospitals in Granada city.
Change in cardiac diastolic functionBaseline and 9 monthsMeasured using resting ultrasound echocardiography with markers such as E/e' ratio and left atrial strain. Due to logistic constraints, this outcome will only be assessed in participants recruited from the hospitals in Granada city.
Change in cardiac dimensionsBaseline and 9 monthsMeasured using resting ultrasound echocardiography with markers such as left atrial volume index, and other ventricular and atrial diameters and volumes. Unit: mL/m². Due to logistic constraints, this outcome will only be assessed in participants recruited from the hospitals in Granada city.
Change in transcriptomic profileBaseline and 9 monthsGene expression analyses will be conducted using RNA blood samples.
Change in epigenomic profileBaseline and 9 monthsDNA methylation analyses will be conducted using blood samples.
Change in additional heart failure-related patient perceptionsBaseline, 3 months, 9 months and 12 monthsHeart failure-related patient perceptions measured with subscales and individual domains of the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ): * Overall Summary Scale (combines symptom, physical limitations, social limitations, and quality of life domains) * Self-efficacy Scale. Scores are transformed to a 0-100 scale; higher scores indicate better heart-failure health status.
Qualitative usability of the intervention with interviewsEnd of intervention (9 months)Measured based on patient perceptions using semi-structured interviews, such as reported barriers and facilitators. These will be assessed only in participants in the intervention group.
Qualitative feasibility of the intervention with interviewsEnd of intervention (9 months)Measured based on patient perceptions using semi-structured interviews, such as ability to engage in the program as intended in daily life. These will be assessed only in participants in the intervention group.
Qualitative usability of the intervention with a custom questionnaireEnd of intervention (9 months)Measured based on patient perceptions collected using a custom usability questionnaire adapted to the intervention and population, derived from the System Usability Scale. These will be assessed only in participants in the intervention group.
Change in general cognitionBaseline and 9 monthsMeasured with the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) total score (1-30).
Change in processing speedBaseline and 9 monthsMeasured by (i) the Trail Making Test Part A (TMT-A), where shorter completion times indicate better performance; and (ii) the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST), with the outcome defined as the total number of correct responses within the time limit (120 sec).
Change in executive function and attentional/Inhibitory controlBaseline and 9 monthsMeasured by (i) Trail Making Test Part B (TMT-B), where shorter completion times indicate better performance; (ii) Dimensional Change Card Sort (DCCS), and (iii) the Flanker test, both with computed scores representing accuracy and reaction time.
Change in episodic memoryBaseline and 9 monthsMeasured by (i) the free recall item of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), and (ii) the Picture Sequence Memory Test (PSMT), with raw scores indicating memory performance.
Change in brain volumeBaseline and 9 monthsMeasured with magnetic resonance imaging using a T1-weighted Magnetization-Prepared Rapid Acquisition Gradient Echo (MPRAGE) structural sequence. This outcome will be assessed only in participants without MRI incompatibilities
Change in brain areaBaseline and 9 monthsMeasured with magnetic resonance imaging using a T1-weighted Magnetization-Prepared Rapid Acquisition Gradient Echo (MPRAGE) structural sequence. This outcome will be assessed only in participants without MRI incompatibilities.
Change in cortical thicknessBaseline and 9 monthsMeasured with magnetic resonance imaging using a T1-weighted Magnetization-Prepared Rapid Acquisition Gradient Echo (MPRAGE) structural sequence. This outcome will be assessed only in participants without MRI incompatibilities.

Countries

Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026