Skip to content

Peer Group Training vs Direct Instruction to Reduce Cyberbullying Among High School Boys

Comparing the Effect of Peer Group Training and Direct Instruction on Mechanisms to Counteract Cyberbullying Among Male High School Students in Tehran

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07204730
Acronym
CyberPeer
Enrollment
252
Registered
2025-10-02
Start date
2024-02-20
Completion date
2025-04-01
Last updated
2025-10-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cyberbullying

Keywords

Cyberbullying, Peer Education, Social Skills Training, Emotional Intelligence, High School Students, Adolescent Behavior, Virtual Harassment, School-based Intervention, Peer-led Training, Direct Instruction

Brief summary

This study aims to explore ways to reduce cyberbullying among male high school students in Tehran by comparing two types of training: direct instruction from a psychologist and peer-led training. Cyberbullying is a serious problem that affects many teenagers, causing stress, emotional difficulties, and social challenges. Learning effective strategies to prevent and respond to cyberbullying may help improve students' emotional skills and overall well-being. The study includes 252 male students from grades 9 to 11 in three high schools. School staff first attend a short session to learn about cyberbullying and its consequences. Students are then randomly assigned to one of three groups: Direct Training Group: A psychologist leads six two-hour sessions teaching social skills such as empathy, problem-solving, and stress management. Peer Training Group: A smaller group of volunteer students attends the same sessions and then shares the information with their classmates. Their progress is monitored weekly. Control Group: Students receive no special training. Assessments are conducted before the program and three months after it ends. All students complete a questionnaire that measures emotional intelligence and experiences with cyberbullying. This study will provide information on the design, implementation, and feasibility of social skills training programs aimed at addressing cyberbullying in high school settings.

Detailed description

The rapid growth of Internet use among adolescents has introduced both opportunities and risks. One significant concern is cyberbullying, defined as intentional, repeated harm inflicted through electronic communication. Male high school students may be particularly vulnerable to engaging in or being targeted by cyberbullying, and schools often lack structured programs to address these behaviors. Previous research suggests that social skills training, including empathy development, problem-solving, and stress management, may improve emotional regulation. Peer-led interventions have also been proposed as a strategy to leverage social influence to reinforce positive behaviors.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALDirect Social Skills Training

Participants attended six two-hour sessions led by a licensed psychologist. Sessions focused on social skills, including empathy, problem-solving, stress management, and strategies to prevent and counteract cyberbullying. Outcomes were measured at baseline and three months post-intervention.

BEHAVIORALPeer-Led Social Skills Training

A volunteer group of students attended six two-hour sessions with a psychologist and then taught their peers the same curriculum. Weekly progress reports were submitted to the psychologist to ensure fidelity. Outcomes on emotional intelligence and cyberbullying were assessed at baseline and three months post-intervention.

OTHERControl No Training

Participants in the control group received no intervention during the study period. Outcomes were assessed at baseline and three months post-intervention to provide a comparison for the experimental groups.

Sponsors

Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Masking description

This study was conducted as an open-label trial. Neither the participants, the peer or psychologist trainers, nor the outcome assessors were blinded to group assignments. All parties were aware of which intervention each participant received, as blinding was not feasible for this behavioral and educational intervention.

Intervention model description

Participants were randomly assigned to one of three groups: direct psychologist-led training, peer-mediated training, or control (no intervention). Each group received its assigned intervention (or no intervention) simultaneously, and outcomes were assessed at baseline and three months post-intervention to compare effectiveness across groups.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
15 Years to 20 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Male students in grades 9-11. Age between 15 and 20 years. Enrolled in one of the participating high schools in Tehran. Parental/guardian consent and student assent provided. Willingness to participate in training sessions and complete questionnaires.

Exclusion criteria

* Prior participation in intensive social skills or anti-cyberbullying training programs. Diagnosed psychological disorders that would interfere with participation. Inability to attend intervention sessions or follow-up assessments.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Emotional IntelligenceBaseline (pre-test) and theree months post-interventionEmotional intelligence will be measured using the Bar-On Emotional Intelligence

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cyberbullying Roles (Bully, Victim, Both, Neither)Baseline (pre-test) and three months post-interventionEmotional intelligence will be assessed using the Bar-On Emotional Intelligence Inventory (EQ-i), which evaluates intrapersonal, interpersonal, stress management, adaptability, and general mood domains. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater emotional intelligence.

Countries

Iran

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026