Skip to content

Real-Time Intracardiac Echocardiography for Ventricular Arrhythmia Ablation

Real-Time Intracardiac Echocardiography for Ventricular Arrhythmia Ablation: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07201506
Acronym
REAL-ICE
Enrollment
70
Registered
2025-10-01
Start date
2026-03-25
Completion date
2027-06-30
Last updated
2026-04-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ablation of Arrhythmias, Premature Ventricular Contractions, Ventricular Arrhythmia, Ventricular Tachycardia

Brief summary

This study is investigating whether using ultrasound directly inside the heart during ablation of heart rhythm disorders in the ventricles can reduce radiation exposure for patients. During an ablation, catheters are guided through the heart to treat the abnormal electrical signals. Usually, X-ray imaging (fluoroscopy) is used to see where the catheters are, which exposes both patients and hospital staff to radiation. The study is randomized and controlled: half of the participants will have the ablation with ultrasound inside the heart, and the other half will have the standard ablation without ultrasound during the procedure. The main goal is to compare the amount of X-ray time used during the procedure. Secondary goals are to look at safety, effectiveness, and the total procedure time. Patients with premature ventricular contractions or ventricular tachycardia can take part. A total of 70 people will be included, 35 in each group. Using ultrasound inside the heart makes it possible to see the catheters and heart structures directly, so many steps can be done without X-rays. This could make ablations safer and reduce radiation exposure. The study is being carried out at Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and at University Hospital Basel. All steps are standardized and data are collected carefully. The results will show whether ultrasound during ablations can significantly reduce radiation and make ablations more efficient and safer.

Interventions

DEVICEPVC and VT ablation with ICE

Premature ventricular contraction (PVC) and ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation with intracardiac echocardiography (ICE)

DEVICEPVC and VT ablation without ICE

Premature ventricular contraction (PVC) and ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation without intracardiac echocardiography (ICE)

Sponsors

Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern
Lead SponsorOTHER
University of Bern
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients (≥18y) undergoing a premature ventricular contraction or ventricular tachycardia ablation.

Exclusion criteria

* Origin of ventricular arrhythmia with high likelihood in the right ventricular outflow tract (left-bundle-inferior axis, \>V4 transition precordially) * Primary epicardial ablation planned * Congenital heart disease * Presence of a mechanical tricuspid valve prosthesis * Unwilling or unable to comply fully with study procedures and followup

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Total fluoroscopy time (minutes)Day 0 (during procedure)Total fluoroscopy time (minutes) from the start to the end of the ablation procedure of ventricular arrhythmias

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Dose area productDay 0 (during procedure)Dose area product (cGy·cm²)
Cumulative radiation doseDay 0 (during procedure)Cumulative radiation dose (mGy)
Total procedure time (minutes)Day 0 (during procedure)Procedure start time is defined as the time of first vascular puncture (stick), and procedure end time is defined as the placement of the vascular closure suture.
Rate of acute procedural successDay 0 (during procedure)Defined as a reduction of premature ventricular contraction (PVC) burden by ≥80% and/or ventricular tachycardia (VT) non-inducibility or non-inducibility of clinical VT
Rate of sustained VT during follow-upDay 0-90 after procedureAny sustained ventricular tachycardia episode (lasting ≥30 seconds or requiring an intervention by implantable cardioverter defibrillator). Assessed by a 7-day Holter and/or an implanted cardiac device, if available.
PVC reduction (%) during follow-upDay 0-90 after procedureReduction of premature ventricular contraction (PVC) burden by ≥80%. Assessed by a 7-day Holter and/or an implanted cardiac device, if available.

Countries

Switzerland

Contacts

CONTACTBoldizsar Kovacs, MD
boldizsar.kovacs@insel.ch+41 31 664 03 84

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 2, 2026