Skip to content

Robotic-assisted (MAKO) Versus Manual Total Knee Arthroplasty for Knee Osteoarthritis

Single-center, Randomized, Controlled, Double Blinded, 24-month Trial to Compare Robotic-assisted (MAKO) and Manual Total Knee Arthroplasty for Primary Osteoarthritis With 10 Year Follow-up for Complications

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07201207
Enrollment
170
Registered
2025-10-01
Start date
2025-09-30
Completion date
2037-09-30
Last updated
2025-10-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Osteoarthritis, Knee

Keywords

arthroplasty, robotic-assisted arthroplasty, knee osteoarthritis

Brief summary

Background: Total knee arthroplasty is a golden standard procedure for end-stage knee osteoarthritis. However, up to 20% of the patients are not satisfied with the outcome. Recently, robotic-assisted TKAs have been developed to offer individual alignment and to achieve accuracy in positioning with more subtle soft-tissue handling, thus possibly leading into better outcome. Hypothesis: The investigators hypnotize that, robotic-assisted TKA is superior to manual TKA for end-stage osteoarthritis in respect to functional outcome, short-term rehabilitation and cost-efficiency. Trial desing: The investigators will conduct a single-center, randomized, controlled, double blinded superiority trial of 24-months to compare robotic-assisted and manual total knee arthroplasty in respect to functional outcome, implant positioning, short-term rehabilitation and cost-efficiency with up to 10 years follow-up for complications. The principle outcome measure will be patient reported outcome measure (PROM) Oxford knee score (OKS) points (0-48 points) at two years after surgery. Minimal clinically important difference will be considered as 5 points. Other PROMS, patient satisfaction, short-term rehabilitation, implant positioning, knee range of motion, length of sick leave and cost efficiency will also be reported. Patients will be followed up to 10 years for complications (infection, manipulation and revisions). This study will be conducted in Central Hospital of Satakunta (Satasairaala), Finland. The investigators will recruit 170 adult patients (aged 50-80), with end-stage (Kellgren-Lawrence grade IV) primary osteoarhritis. Patients will be randomly assingned to either robotic-assisted or manual TKA. Patients will be blinded by the intervention method used. Personnel and investigators assessing the patients and interpreting the data will also be blinded to the surgical method.

Interventions

In robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty, the procedure is performed with the guidance of the robot according to CT-based plan.

In manual total knee arthroplasty, the procedure is performed with jig guides according to whole leg weight bearing x-ray planning.

Sponsors

Satakunta Central Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age over 50 and below 80 years * End-stage Kellgren-Lawrence grade IV KOA * Failed conservative treatment

Exclusion criteria

* Post-traumatic knee osteoarthritis * Rheumatoid arthritis * Previous knee infections * Previous knee surgery (other than diagnostic arthroscopy or meniscectomy) * Knee range of motion within 15 to 100 degrees * Mechanical axis over 15 degrees of varus or over 10 degrees of valgus * Body mass index over 40 kg/m2 * Significant patellofemoral osteoarthritis (Kellgren-Lawrence grade III or IV) * Diabetes treated with insulin * Malignancy with ongoing treatment * Systemic glukocorticosteroid or antimetabolite medication during the last 5 years * Conditions that do not allow general anesthesia * Patients' denial for operative treatment and/or participation in the trial

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Oxford Knee score OKS at 24 months24 monthPatient reported outcome measure, knee function questionnaire Oxford Knee Score (OKS) at 24 month. Scale from 0 (=worst) to 48 (=excellent) points Minimal clinically important difference considered as 5 points.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Oxford Knee Score at 3 and 12 months3 and 12 months visitsPatient reported outcome measure, knee function questionnaire Oxford Knee Score (OKS) at 3 and 12 months. Scale from 0 (=worst) to 48 (=excellent) points. Minimal clinically important difference considered as 5 points.
Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) at 3, 12 and 24 months3, 12 and 24 monthsPatient reported outcome measure, knee function questionnaire KOOS points at 3, 12 and 24 months after the operation. Scale from 0 (=worst) to 100 (=excellent).
The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) at 3, 12 and 24 months.3, 12 and 24 monthsPatient reported outcome measure, knee function questionnaire WOMAC score at 3, 12 and 24 months after the operation. Scale from 0 (= excellent) to 96 (= worst) points.
Knee swellingFirst day after the operationKnee swelling, knee diameter measured above the patella and compared to the unaffected size, the diameter difference in centimeters between the legs. Indirect soft-tissue damage measures
Patient satisfaction inquiry at 3, 12 and 24 months3, 12 and 24 monthsPatient satisfaction question asked at 3, 12 and 24 months after the operation: If you could choose again, would you still go for the sugery? 0= no 1 = probably not 2= I don't know 4 = probably yes 5 = yes.
Working ability, lenght of the sick leaveup to 24 monthsLength of the sick leave after the surgery, measured as days. Asked from the patient and checked from the patient files.
Working ability, part-time vs full-timeAsked at 3 month, 12 months and 24 months after the surgeryAsked from the patient at the 3, 12 and 24 months follow-ups visits. Has the operation changed your ability to work full-time or part-time? Options: a) yes my work changed from full-time to part-time after surgery b) no my work is as much full-time or part-time as it was before the surgey c) yes my work changed from full-time to part-time after surgery d) my work as part-time or full-time has changed from other reasons not related to the knee.
Working ability, physical demands of the jobAsked at 3 month, 12 months and 24 months after the surgeryAsked from the patient at the 3, 12 and 24 months follow-ups visits. Has the physical demands of your job changed after the operation because of the knee? Options: a) yes the physical demands of my job is now lower than it was before the surgery b) no my work is as physically demanding as it was before the surgery c) yes the physical demands of my job is now higher than it was before the surgery d) the physical demands of my job has changed from other reasons not related to the knee.
Life quality questionnaire 15 dimensions (15D) at 3, 12 and 24 months3, 12 and 24 monthsLife quality questionnaire 15 dimensions at 3 follow up visits. Scale from 15 (=exellent) to 75 (=worst) points.
Pain at rest and during walking on visual analoque scale (VAS)First day after the operation and at 3, 12 and 24 monthspain at rest and during walking on visual analoque scale (VAS) from 0 (=no pain) to 10 (=extreme pain)
Opioid usageUp to two weeksOpioid usage mg/day
Blood lossFirst day after the operationBlood loss evaluated by the by measuring pre- and post-operative (first day after surgery) hemoglobin g/L. Difference between the pre-operative and post-operative Hemoglobin (g/L) values.
Lenght of the hospital stayUp to 1 weekLength of hospital stay measured in days.
Post-operative CRPFirst day after the operationpost-op CRP as a indirect soft-tissue damage measure
Range of knee motion (ROM)First day after the operation and at 3, 12 and 24 months visitsRange of knee motion measured with goniometry as degrees at the ward on first post-operative day and ant the 3, 12 and 24 months visits.
Radiological outcome measures, alingmentWeight bearing whole leg x-rays taken 3 months post-operatively.Knee alignment measured from post-operative weight bearing whole leg x-rays as degrees. Measured as the degrees between femoral mechanical axis line and tibial mechanical axis line.
Radiological outcome measures, posterior condylar offsetpost-operative knee x-rays taken within 1 week after the operationPost-op knee x-ray taken at the first post-operative day; posterior condylar offset, measured as maximal thickness of the posterior condyle projecting posteriorly to a straight line drawn as the extension of the posterior femoral shaft cortex, measured in millimeters
Radiological outcome measures, Insall-salvati ratiopost-operative knee x-rays taken within 1 week after the operationMeasured from post-operative knee x-rays. Insall-salvati ratio: the length of the patellar tendon in millimeters divided by the length of the patella in millimeters.
Radiological outcome measures, Overhangingpost-operative knee x-rays taken within 1 week after the operationMeasured from post-operative knee x-rays. Overhanging of the tibial or femoral component from medial lateral, posterior or anterior side measured as millimeters. The length between the bony edge to the edge of the component.
Radiological outcome measures, Notchingpost-operative knee x-rays taken within 1 week after the operationMeasured from post-operative knee x-rays. Notching of the anterior femoral cortex. The lenght in millimeters between the anterior femoral cortex and the anterior edge femoral component in sagittal x-ray.
Complications, revisons3, 12 and 24 months and five and ten yearsRevisions meaning re-operation of the knee due any reason. Checked from the patient files at 3, 12 and 24 months and five and ten years after surgery. Measured as number of revisions
Complications, infections3, 12 and 24 months and five and ten years after surgeryInfections that recuire antibiotics or revision surgery. Checked from the patient files at 3, 12 and 24 months and five and ten years after surgery. Measured as number of infections
Complications, knee manipulation under anestesia due stiff knee3, 12 and 24 months and five and ten years after surgery.Need for knee manipulations under anesthesia due stiff knee. Measured as number of manipulations. Checked form the patient files at 3, 12 and 24 months and five and ten years after surgery
Complications, re-admissionup to 24 monthsUnplanned post-operative re-admissions due to the knee operation. Measured as days at the ward.
Complications, unplannet emergency unit visitsup to 24 monthsUnplanned post-operative visits to the hospital emergency unit due to the knee operation, number of visits
Costsup to 24 monthsTotal cost of the treatment, measured as amount of money.
Operation timeDay of the surgeryTime of the operation in hours and minutes checked form patient files.

Contacts

Primary ContactJuha Kukkonen, dos MD
juha.kukkonen@sata.fi+358 45 177 7747
Backup ContactAleksi Annaniemi, PhD MD
aleksi.annaniemi@sata.fi+358 505117060

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026