Skip to content

Accuracy of 3D Printed Custom-Made Registration Method for Dynamic Navigation Implant Surgery Using Mininavident in the Esthetic Zone: A Clinical Trial

Accuracy of 3D Printed Custom-Made Registration Method for Dynamic Navigation Implant Surgery Using Mininavident in the Esthetic Zone: A Clinical Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07199153
Enrollment
10
Registered
2025-09-30
Start date
2025-08-10
Completion date
2025-10-15
Last updated
2025-09-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dental Implantation Accuracy

Keywords

Dynamic Navigation Surgery, Dental Implant Surgery, Implant Accuracy, Esthetic Zone, Computer-Guided Implantology, Digital Dentistry, Prosthetically Driven Implant Planning

Brief summary

This clinical trial evaluates the accuracy of a 3D printed custom-made registration method for dynamic navigation implant surgery using the Mininavident system in the esthetic zone of the anterior maxilla. Ten patients with a single missing anterior tooth will undergo CBCT-based planning, intraoral scanning, and guided implant placement using 3D printed registration markers. Postoperative CBCT analysis will measure deviations between planned and placed implants in terms of angular, coronal, and apical positions. The study aims to determine whether 3D printed markers provide clinically acceptable accuracy (\<2 mm, \<5°) and to assess their feasibility as a reproducible alternative to standard registration methods.

Detailed description

Accurate implant positioning is essential for esthetic and functional success, particularly in the anterior maxilla. Dynamic navigation systems (DNS) provide real-time guidance but depend on reliable registration between patient anatomy and virtual planning. Errors may occur with conventional fiducial markers, highlighting the need for more precise methods. This clinical trial investigates the use of 3D printed custom registration markers with the Mininavident DNS for implant placement in the esthetic zone. Ten patients with a single missing anterior tooth will undergo CBCT-based planning and guided implant placement using the custom markers. Postoperative CBCT scans will be compared with preoperative plans to measure positional and angular deviations. The primary outcome is the accuracy of implant placement, with deviations expected to remain within clinically acceptable limits (\<2 mm, \<5°). Secondary outcomes include assessing the feasibility and reproducibility of incorporating 3D printed registration into DNS workflows. Results may validate this approach as a cost-effective, patient-specific solution to enhance precision and predictability in implant dentistry.

Interventions

DEVICED Printed Custom Registration Marker for Dynamic Navigation

A patient-specific, 3D printed registration marker designed for use with the Mininavident dynamic navigation system. The marker is fabricated based on CBCT and intraoral scans, enabling accurate registration between virtual planning and clinical implant placement in the esthetic zone. Accuracy of placement is assessed through postoperative CBCT superimposition.

Sponsors

Cairo University
CollaboratorOTHER
Sherif Aly Sadek
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Single missing tooth in the anterior maxilla * ≥12 mm bone height and ≥5.5 mm width * D3 bone density * Angle's Class I occlusion * No systemic contraindications to implant surgery

Exclusion criteria

* Heavy smoking or uncontrolled diabetes * Radiation therapy involving the head and neck * Parafunctional habits (e.g., bruxism) * Class III malocclusion or edge-to-edge bites

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Accuracy of Implant Placement Using 3D Printed Registration MarkersWithin 1 week after implant placementAccuracy will be assessed by measuring deviations between the planned and actual implant positions using postoperative CBCT superimposed with the preoperative plan.

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Primary ContactHala Soliman
hala.zakaria@dentistry.cu.edu.eg+201006788228

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026