Skip to content

Comparison of Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy and Laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy for the Treatment of Unilateral Upper Ureteral Stone

Comparison of Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy and Laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy for the Treatment of Unilateral Upper Ureteral Stone

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07197385
Enrollment
56
Registered
2025-09-29
Start date
2025-01-10
Completion date
2025-06-10
Last updated
2025-09-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ureteral Calculi, Urolithiasis

Keywords

Ureteral Stones, Upper Ureteric Calculi, Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy, Ureteroscopy, Laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy

Brief summary

Kidney stones are a common health problem that can cause severe pain, blockage of urine flow, and even long-term kidney damage if left untreated. When stones move from the kidney into the upper part of the ureter (the tube that carries urine to the bladder), treatment often becomes more difficult. Several treatment options are available, including breaking the stones with sound waves, removing them with small telescopes, or performing surgery. However, the best method for larger stones in the upper ureter is still debated. This study will compare two commonly used minimally invasive surgical techniques for removing upper ureteral stones. The first method is ureteroscopic lithotripsy (URS), in which a thin scope is passed through the urinary passage to directly reach the stone and break it into small pieces using a pneumatic device. The second method is laparoscopic ureterolithotomy (LU), a keyhole surgical procedure in which small incisions are made in the abdomen, and the stone is removed directly through the ureter. Fifty-six adult patients with a single upper ureteral stone measuring 10-20 mm will be randomly assigned to either URS or LU. Both groups will undergo standard preoperative evaluations, and infection will be treated before surgery. The outcomes will be assessed in terms of operation time, length of hospital stay, level of postoperative pain, use of pain medications, complications during or after surgery, and the stone-free rate (absence of residual stone fragments larger than 3 mm after four weeks). By comparing these two procedures, this study aims to identify which treatment is safer and more effective for patients with upper ureteral stones. The results will provide useful evidence to guide doctors and patients in making the best treatment choices.

Interventions

PROCEDURELaparoscopic Ureterolithotomy

Keyhole laparoscopic approach to remove proximal ureteral stones by direct ureteral incision and closure.

Semirigid ureteroscopic fragmentation of upper ureteral stones using pneumatic lithotripsy.

Sponsors

Lahore General Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients of both genders with age ≥ 18 years. * Patients with a duration of symptoms for more than 1 month. * Patients having a unilateral single stone of 10 mm to 20 mm in diameter, located between the ureteropelvic junction and the upper border of the sacroiliac joint (upper ureteral stone).

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with a history of ipsilateral ureteric surgeries, previous open abdominal surgeries, bleeding disorders and pregnancy. * Before surgery, patients had a positive urine culture, fever (37.60c) and leukocytosis \> 12.000 per microliter. * Patients having solitary kidney and co-morbidities e.g., cardiovascular, Liver, respiratory illnesses, or serum creatinine \>1.5 mg/dl. * Horseshoe kidneys, pelvic kidneys, pyonephrosis, ureteropelvic junction blockage, and ureteral stricture. * Patients with unsuitable for general anesthesia.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Operative TimeIntraoperative, recorded at the time of surgeryOperative time will be measured from the start of the surgical procedure until urethral catheterization is completed. The duration will be recorded in minutes for each patient and compared between ureteroscopic lithotripsy and laparoscopic ureterolithotomy groups.
Stone-Free Rate (SFR)At 4 weeks postoperatively (before removal of DJ stent).The stone-free rate will be defined as the absence of residual stone fragments \>3 mm, confirmed by radiological imaging (X-ray KUB or NCCT) at follow-up. Patients with residual fragments ≤3 mm will be considered stone-free, while those with larger fragments or requiring auxiliary procedures will be considered not stone-free.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Postoperative Pain (VAS Score)Day of surgery and postoperative day 1.Pain intensity will be assessed using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain). Scores will be recorded on the day of surgery and the first postoperative day. Analgesic use (mg dose administered) will also be documented.

Countries

Pakistan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026