Skip to content

An in Vivo CT Imaging Study of GMA-Tulip, I-gel, and LMA Supreme (GLAM-II)

An in Vivo CT Imaging Study After Insertion of the LMA Supreme, I-gel, and GMA-Tulip Airway Devices Under General Anesthesia (GLAM-II)

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07196696
Acronym
GLAM-II
Enrollment
9
Registered
2025-09-29
Start date
2025-10-12
Completion date
2025-12-31
Last updated
2025-11-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Supraglottic Airway Device

Keywords

GMA-Tulip, I-gel, LMA-Supreme, Supraglottic airway device

Brief summary

Laryngeal masks are core devices for supraglottic airway management, and the accuracy of their anatomical position directly impacts ventilation safety and the incidence of complications. Despite their wide clinical application, gaps remain in understanding their in vivo anatomical characteristics. This study aims to evaluate the in vivo anatomical features (e.g., insertion depth, anatomical alignment, tissue compression) of three laryngeal masks (LMA Supreme, I-gel, GMA-Tulip) using CT scanning in anesthetized patients undergoing CT interventional therapy, providing anatomical evidence for optimized laryngeal mask selection and complication prevention.

Detailed description

After approval by the Ethics Committee of Zhejiang Cancer Hospital (Approval Number: IRB-2025-001 (IIT)), this study will be registered on ClinicalTrials.gov prior to participant enrollment. Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants. The study is planned to be conducted from September 2025 to December 2025. Eligible participants are 18-75 years old, ASA physical status I-II, BMI \<30 kg/m², scheduled for CT interventional therapy, and without contraindications (e.g., head/neck airway anomalies, participation in other clinical studies). Pre-procedure Preparation: Patients fast and abstain from fluids as per standard protocols, with no premedication. Upon admission to the operating room, standard monitoring (ECG, HR, BP, SpO₂) is initiated, and an intravenous access is established. Pre-anesthesia baseline HR and BP are recorded. Anesthesia Induction: Pre-oxygenation with 8 L/min oxygen via face mask for 3 minutes. Anesthesia is induced with propofol (3.5 μg/ml) and remifentanil (4 ng/ml). After loss of eyelash reflex, rocuronium (0.9 mg/kg) is administered, and laryngeal mask insertion is performed 2 minutes post-rocuronium injection. Laryngeal Mask Insertion: Participants are randomly assigned (via computer-generated sequence) to one of three groups: LMA Supreme Group (L Group), I-gel Group (I Group), or GMA-Tulip Group (G Group). Each patient receives one laryngeal mask insertion by an anesthesiologist with ≥5 years of experience, following standardized insertion protocols for each device: LMA Supreme: Lubricate the posterior surface; place the head in neutral or sniffing position; advance the mask along the midline of the oral cavity until resistance is felt. I-gel: Lubricate the posterior surface; advance along the hard palate until definite resistance is felt. GMA-Tulip: Lubricate the posterior surface; place the head in sniffing position; avoid tongue entrapment; advance until passing the base of the tongue (no need to seek strong resistance); gently shake to ensure tight fit. Laryngeal mask size is selected based on body weight: L Group: 3# (30-50 kg), 4# (50-70 kg), 5# (70-100 kg); I Group: 3# (30-60 kg), 4# (50-90 kg), 5# (\>90 kg); G Group: 2.5# (\<60 kg), 3# (60-85 kg), 4# (\>80 kg); Anesthesia Maintenance: Propofol (3.5 μg/ml) and remifentanil (2 ng/ml) are infused to maintain BIS 40-60. Additional rocuronium (0.15 mg/kg) or sufentanil (5 μg) is administered as needed. Hemodynamics are maintained within ±20% of baseline using medications (atropine, ephedrine, esmolol, dopamine, norepinephrine, nitroglycerin) if required. At the end of the procedure, propofol and remifentanil are discontinued, and rocuronium is antagonized with sugammadex sodium (200 mg). The laryngeal mask is removed when the patient regains consciousness and can follow commands. Participants recover in the Post-Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU) for ≥1 hour before discharge. Alignment Verification: Mechanical ventilation is initiated with parameters: VT 6-8 ml/kg, I:E 1:2, RR 12-14 breaths/min, maintaining PETCO₂ 35-45 mmHg. Air tightness is confirmed via leak test (25 cmH₂O pressure) and auscultation. Fiberoptic laryngoscopy is used to grade anatomical alignment (Grade I: Only one aryepiglottic fold and partial laryngeal inlet visible, SpO₂ \>98%; Grade II: Bilateral aryepiglottic folds and partial laryngeal inlet visible, SpO₂ \>98%; Grade III: Bilateral aryepiglottic folds, laryngeal inlet, and partial glottis visible; Grade IV: Entire glottis visible). Outcome Assessment: CT scanning is performed to measure insertion depth, anatomical alignment, and tissue compression. Post-procedure follow-up is conducted at 24 hours to assess complications (mucosal injury, hoarseness, sore throat via VAS 0-10, regurgitation).

Interventions

DEVICEGMA-Tulip

Under general anesthesia, GMA-Tulip laryngeal mask is inserted following standardized protocols. CT scanning and fiberoptic laryngoscopy are performed to assess insertion depth, anatomical alignment, and tissue compression.

DEVICEI-gel

Under general anesthesia, I-gel laryngeal mask is inserted following standardized protocols. CT scanning and fiberoptic laryngoscopy are performed to assess insertion depth, anatomical alignment, and tissue compression.

DEVICELMA-Supreme insertion

Under general anesthesia, LMA Supreme laryngeal mask is inserted following standardized protocols. CT scanning and fiberoptic laryngoscopy are performed to assess insertion depth, anatomical alignment, and tissue compression.

Sponsors

Zhejiang Cancer Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SEQUENTIAL
Primary purpose
DEVICE_FEASIBILITY
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Aged 18-75 years, scheduled for CT interventional therapy; * Aged 18-75 years, scheduled for CT interventional therapy; * Body Mass Index (BMI) \<30 kg/m²; * Good communication and cooperation, with voluntary signing of the informed consent form.

Exclusion criteria

* Presence of head/neck or airway anatomical abnormalities (e.g., laryngeal cartilage malformation, Grade III tonsillar hypertrophy, tongue hypertrophy, cervical spine malformation) that may affect laryngeal mask insertion or CT imaging evaluation; * Current participation in other clinical studies.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Insertion depth of the three laryngeal masksDuring CT scanning immediately after laryngeal mask insertion (within 30 minutes of insertion)Measurement of the distance from the laryngeal mask tip to the glottis and the upper edge of the 5th cervical vertebra (C5), and the relationship between the mask tip and the cricoid cartilage plate (via CT imaging)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Anatomical alignment of the three laryngeal masksDuring fiberoptic examination and CT scanning immediately after laryngeal mask insertionAssessment of laryngeal inlet coverage (glottis, epiglottis, aryepiglottic folds, arytenoid cartilage, interarytenoid notch) via fiberoptic laryngoscopy (graded as Grade I-IV) and CT imaging.
Degree of local tissue compressionDuring CT scanning immediately after laryngeal mask insertion.Quantification of epiglottis/tongue compression, displacement distance of the hyoid bone and cricoid cartilage plate, inter-common carotid artery distance, tracheal inner diameter change, and the area of the mask body at the upper edge, lower edge, and middle of the cricoid cartilage plate (via CT imaging)
Post-extubation complications24 hours after laryngeal mask extubationEvaluation of mucosal injury (visible bleeding during mask removal), hoarseness (patient-reported), sore throat (VAS 0-10, 0 = no pain, 10 = severe pain), and regurgitation (presence of gastric fluid in the oropharynx) at 24 hours post-extubation.

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactXiaochun Jin, M.D
ec@zjcc.org.cn+86 571-88122564
Backup ContactJiangling Wang, Dr
wangjl@zjcc.org.cn

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026