Skip to content

The Efficacy and Safety of Pregabalin and Crisugabalin in Patients With Fibromyalgia

Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Pregabalin Monotherapy Versus Other Neuromodulatory Drugs (Crisugabalin) in the Treatment of Fibromyalgia: A Multicenter Clinical Study

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07196657
Enrollment
1116
Registered
2025-09-29
Start date
2025-09-30
Completion date
2027-08-31
Last updated
2026-02-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Fibromyalgia, Pain, Pregabalin

Brief summary

Fibromyalgia (FM) is a chronic pain syndrome characterized by widespread pain, fatigue, and emotional disorders. Its onset is related to factors such as central sensitization and imbalance of neurotransmitters. The current mainstream treatments include pregabalin, but the efficacy of pregabalin is limited, with only 25%-40% pain relief rate, and adverse reactions are common. crisugabalin, a new highly selective α2δ ligand, has shown potential in animal models or preliminary clinical trials, but there is insufficient evidence for its application in FM. This study aims to explore the effectiveness and safety of pregabalin or crisugabalin in treating FM, with the aim of providing a better treatment option for FM patients.

Interventions

DRUGPregabalin

For the pregabalin group, treatment will be initiated at a dosage of 150 mg daily, administered into 2 or 3 divided doses. After 3 to 7 days, the dose will be titrated to 300 mg per day, with subsequent incremental increases of 150 mg daily permitted at 3-day to 7-day intervals based on therapeutic response and tolerability, up to a maximum dose of 450 mg daily.

For the crisugabalin group, therapy will begin at 20 mg twice daily, with a maximum allowable dose of 40 mg twice daily.

Sponsors

Beijing Tiantan Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER
China-Japan Friendship Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University
CollaboratorOTHER
Peking University Third Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University
CollaboratorOTHER
Zhongnan Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Xiangya Hospital of Central South University
CollaboratorOTHER
The Affiliated Hospital of Yanbian University
CollaboratorOTHER
The Second Hospital University of South China
CollaboratorOTHER
First Affiliated Hospital of Lanzhou University
CollaboratorUNKNOWN

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosed with FM according to the 2016 Revisions to the 2010/2011 FM diagnostic criteria; * Aged over 18 years old; * Suffering from moderate to severe FM, refractory to non-pharmacological interventions and without prior exposure to recommend pharmacological treatments for FM; * Baseline numeric rating scale (NRS) score of 4 or higher; * Aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase levels below twice the upper limit of normal range; * Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of at least 30 mL/min/1.73 m²; * Willingness to provide informed consent and adequate cognitive and language capabilities to meet all study requirements;

Exclusion criteria

* Previous allergic reactions to pregabalin, crisugabalin, or any of their excipients; * Prior diagnosis of epilepsy or depression requiring antidepressant therapy; * Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding; * Has severe systemic illnesses, such as poorly controlled hypertension, poorly controlled diabetes mellitus, or significant cardiac impairment; * Suffering from acute or chronic pain disorders other than FM.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The proportion of patients achieving pain reliefAt the 12-weeksThe proportion of patients achieving pain relief defined as the proportion of patients whose baseline average pain intensity is reduced by at least 50%. The pain intensity will be measured based on NRS, where 0 represents no pain and 10 represents worst pain imaginable.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The average pain intensityAt the weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12The average pain intensity. The pain intensity will be measured based on NRS, where 0 represents no pain and 10 represents worst pain imaginable.
The worst pain intensityAt the weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12The worst pain intensity. The pain intensity will be measured based on NRS, where 0 represents no pain and 10 represents worst pain imaginable.
Dose of crisugabalin or pregabalinAt the week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12the dose of experimental drug
Average weekly consumption of rescue analgesicsat weeks 4, 8, 12Acetaminophen will be permitted as rescue medication for FM-related pain, at doses up to 1000 mg per administration and not exceeding 3000 mg per day. All rescue medication use, including dose and frequency, will be recorded prospectively.
The Revised FM Impact QuestionnaireAt the weeks 4, 8, and 12The Revised FM Impact Questionnaire is a 21-item self-administered questionnaire, based on symptoms reported within the preceding 7 days. The total score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher values indicating worse health status.
The Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) severity (BPI-S) and interfere (BPI-I) subscAt the weeks 4, 8, and 12The BPI-S assesses pain intensity over the past 24 hours, including 4 items. The BPI-I evaluates the degree to which pain interferes with daily activities, comprising 7 items. Each BPI item is rated on a 0 to 10 NRS, with 0 represents no pain or does not interfere, and 10 represents worst pain imaginable or interferes completely. Higher scores indicate greater pain severity or interfere.
The short-form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)At the weeks 4, 8, and 12The SF-36 assesses health-related quality of life, capturing preferences across various health states. It assesses 8 dimensions: physical functioning, physical role limitations due to physical health, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, emotional role limitations due to emotional problems, and mental health. Scores range from 0 to 100 for each dimension, with higher scores indicating better health status.
Patient Global Impression of Change Scaleat week 12A 7-point patient-reported Likert scale for evaluating subjective overall change in health/symptoms from baseline, used to assess treatment efficacy in clinical research and practice.
The Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (MOS)At the weeks 4, 8, and 12The MOS uses a 6-point scale to evaluate various dimensions of sleep, consisting of 12 items. A score of 1 indicates persistent presence, with a score of 6 denotes complete absence.
The Beck Depression Inventory-Ⅱ (BD-Ⅱ)At the weeks 4, 8, and 12The BD-Ⅱ employs a 4-point scale (ranging from 0 to 3) to evaluate the severity of depressive symptoms, comprising 21 items in total. A score of 0 indicates the absence of symptoms, while a score of 3 reflects severe symptomatology.
Adverse EventsThrough study completion, an average of 12 weeksAdverse Events are defined as events that occur the course of treatment, were not present before prior to the intervention, or represent a worsening of pre-existing conditions. These events will be systematically documented and categorized by severity into grades such as mild, moderate, severe, or life-threatening.

Countries

China

Contacts

CONTACTFang Luo, M.D.
13611326978@163.com+86 13611326978

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 12, 2026