Skip to content

Intra-articular Tenoxicam Versus Triamcinolone Acetonide in Knee Osteoarthritis Management

Comparison of Intra-articular Tenoxicam and Triamcinolone Acetonide in the Management of Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Prospective Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07194135
Enrollment
100
Registered
2025-09-26
Start date
2024-11-03
Completion date
2025-04-30
Last updated
2025-09-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Osteoarthritis, Knee

Keywords

Knee Osteoarthritis, Intra-articular Injection, Tenoxicam, Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs, Triamcinolone Acetonide, Corticosteroid Injections, Pain Management

Brief summary

Knee osteoarthritis is a very common joint condition that leads to pain, stiffness, and difficulty with daily activities, particularly in middle-aged and older adults. Many patients do not get adequate relief from oral pain medications, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, or physical therapy. Because of this, injections directly into the knee joint are often used. Corticosteroid medicines, such as triamcinolone acetonide, are among the most frequently used intra-articular injections. They provide strong and rapid anti-inflammatory effects, but their benefits often wear off after only a few weeks. In addition, corticosteroids may cause unwanted systemic effects such as temporary increases in blood sugar, which can be especially concerning for patients with diabetes. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are another group of medicines that can relieve pain and inflammation. Tenoxicam is a long-acting medicine from this group. When given directly into the knee joint, tenoxicam may provide local pain relief for a longer duration, while reducing the amount of drug that circulates in the body. This may lower the risk of side effects compared with oral treatment or repeated corticosteroid injections. This clinical study was designed to compare the effects of a single intra-articular injection of tenoxicam with a single intra-articular injection of triamcinolone acetonide in patients who have symptomatic knee osteoarthritis. The primary aim was to determine which treatment provides better improvement in knee pain, measured using a visual analog scale. Secondary aims included evaluating knee function using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, monitoring blood sugar control using glycated hemoglobin testing, and assessing the safety of each treatment by recording any local or general adverse events.

Interventions

Intra-articular administration of tenoxicam, 20 milligrams as a single injection, delivered through an anterolateral approach under aseptic technique.

DRUGTriamcinolone Acetonide

Intra-articular administration of triamcinolone acetonide, 40 milligrams as a single injection, delivered through an anterolateral approach under aseptic technique.

Sponsors

Benha University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Masking description

This was an open-label trial. Participants and investigators were aware of treatment allocation.

Intervention model description

Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either intra-articular tenoxicam or intra-articular triamcinolone acetonide.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
45 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adults aged 45 to 75 years * Radiographically confirmed knee osteoarthritis (Kellgren-Lawrence grade II-III) * Persistent knee pain for at least 3 months despite oral non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs * Ability to provide informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Prior intra-articular injection within the past 6 months * Inflammatory arthritis (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis, gout) * Advanced knee osteoarthritis (Kellgren-Lawrence grade IV) * Active joint or systemic infection * Bleeding disorder or anticoagulant use contraindicating injection * Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus * Known hypersensitivity to tenoxicam or triamcinolone acetonide

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Knee Pain Intensity Measured by Visual Analog ScaleBaseline, 2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks after injectionPain intensity in the affected knee was assessed using a visual analog scale (0 to 100 millimeters), where 0 represents no pain and 100 represents the worst imaginable pain. The outcome was defined as the change from baseline score to follow-up assessments.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Knee Function Measured by Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC)Baseline, 2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks after injectionThe Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index evaluates pain, stiffness, and physical function in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Scores range from 0 to 96, with higher scores indicating worse symptoms. The outcome was defined as the change from baseline to follow-up.
Change in Glycemic Control Measured by Glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)Baseline and 1 month after injectionGlycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) was measured to evaluate the effect of intra-articular injection on blood glucose control. The outcome was defined as the change in HbA1c percentage from baseline to one month after injection.

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026