Skip to content

Micro-Dosed vs. Traditional Plyometric Training in Elite Youth Soccer

A Volume-Matched Quasi-Experimental Trial Comparing Micro-Dosed and Traditional Plyometric Training on Speed and Explosive Abilities in Elite Under-19 Soccer Players During the Pre-Season

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07193706
Acronym
TRMD-PLYO_U19
Enrollment
24
Registered
2025-09-26
Start date
2024-07-08
Completion date
2024-09-17
Last updated
2025-09-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Explosive Strength, Microdosing, Plyometric Exercises, Soccer Performance, Speed

Keywords

Micro-dosed plyometric training, Youth soccer players, Explosive strength, Sprint performance, reactive strength

Brief summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if a micro-dosed plyometric training program works as well as a traditional plyometric program for improving speed and explosive abilities in elite under-19 soccer players during the pre-season. The main questions are: 1. Does micro-dosed training improve explosive and speed abilites, such as jumping and sprinting, as much as traditional training? 2. Does it improve reactivity and change-of-direction ability ? Researchers will compare two groups: * Traditional Training Group: 2 sessions per week, about 40 minutes each. * Micro-dosed Group: 3-4 shorter sessions per week, about 20 minutes each. Both groups will complete the same total weekly training volume. Participants will: * Take part in an 8-week plyometric training program during pre-season. * Complete performance tests (CM jump tests, a 30-meter sprint, and a 15-0-5 change-of-direction test, broad jump test, drop jump test) before and after 8-week plyometric intervention, . This study will help coaches and players understand if shorter, more frequent plyometric training sessions can be a good alternative to traditional longer sessions when weekly training load is matched.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALTraditional group training program

This intervention consists of two supervised plyometric training sessions per week, each lasting about 40 minutes. It represents the traditional approach with fewer but longer sessions. The total weekly training volume is equivalent to the micro-dosed group but distributed differently.

BEHAVIORALMicro-dosed group training program

This intervention consists of three to four shorter supervised plyometric sessions per week, each lasting about 20 minutes. It represents a micro-dosed approach, with higher frequency but shorter duration per session. The total weekly training volume is equivalent to the traditional group but distributed across more frequent sessions.

Sponsors

Masaryk University
CollaboratorOTHER
Matej Bel University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Masking description

Masking was not feasible due to the visible differences in training frequency and scheduling.

Intervention model description

This is a parallel-group, quasi-experimental design. Players were allocated into two groups (micro-dosed vs. traditional plyometric training) using performance-based ranking (countermovement jump and drop jump tests) to achieve balanced groups. Both groups completed the similiar total weekly training volume during the 8-week pre-season period.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
17 Years to 19 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Active membership in a U19 elite soccer club during the intervention. * Medical fitness to participate in plyometric training and testing. * Attendance at ≥75% of training sessions. * Completion of all mandatory pre- and post-tests. * Previous experience with plyometric training and testing procedures.

Exclusion criteria

* Medical limitations preventing safe participation in training or testing. * Attendance lower than 75% of scheduled intervention sessions. * Failure to complete mandatory baseline or follow-up testing. * Injury preventing completion of the intervention.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in countermovement jump (CMJ) jump heightBaseline and after 8 weeks of intervention.Change in vertical jump height (cm) measured with dual force plates during a countermovement jump, from baseline (pre-test) to post-intervention (8 weeks).
Change in Sprint Speed (30 m sprint test using 1080 Sprint system)Baseline and after 8 weeks of intervention.Change in sprint velocity (m/s) and split times (0-5 m, 0-10 m, 0-30 m).
Change in Drop Jump Reactive Strength Index (RSI)Baseline and after 8 weeks.Change in reactive strength index (jump height / ground contact time) measured during drop jump from 30 cm platform.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Standing Broad Jump Distance (SBJ)Baseline and after 8 weeks.Change in Standing Broad Jump Distance (SBJ)
Change in Sprint Mechanics (1080 Sprint)Baseline and after 8 weeks.Change in peak force (N) and peak power (W) during 30 m sprint.
Change in Change-of-Direction Performance (15-0-5 test)Baseline and after 8 weeks.Change in time (s) to complete 15-0-5 change-of-direction test, including deceleration and re-acceleration phases.

Countries

Czechia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026