Skip to content

The 30-15 Intermittent Fitness Test Provides Superior Sport-Specific Sensitivity to Treadmill Testing in Elite Female Footballers

The 30-15 Intermittent Fitness Test Provides Superior Sport-Specific Sensitivity to Treadmill Testing in Elite Female Footballers

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07193108
Enrollment
20
Registered
2025-09-25
Start date
2025-03-05
Completion date
2025-05-20
Last updated
2026-02-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Change in Maximal Oxygen Uptake (VO₂Max)

Keywords

aerobic capacity, intermittent fitness assessment, women's football, metabolic response

Brief summary

This study compares the acute aerobic, metabolic, and threshold-related physiological responses elicited by the 30-15 Intermittent Fitness Test (30-15IFT) and a treadmill-based incremental running test in elite female football players. Using a randomized crossover design, all participants completed both testing protocols with a 48-hour recovery period. Outcomes included maximal oxygen uptake, maximal running speed, heart rate responses, lactate-derived thresholds, metabolic tolerance indices, and recovery markers.

Detailed description

Laboratory-based treadmill tests are commonly used to assess aerobic capacity in football players; however, they lack sport-specific characteristics such as intermittent running, accelerations, and changes of direction. The 30-15 Intermittent Fitness Test (30-15IFT) has been proposed as a more ecologically valid field-based alternative. Twenty-seven elite female football players competing in the Turkish Women's Super League completed both the 30-15IFT and a standardized treadmill incremental protocol in a randomized crossover design. Tests were separated by 48 hours and performed under controlled environmental conditions. Physiological variables including VO₂max, maximal running speed, maximal heart rate, respiratory exchange ratio, lactate-derived thresholds (OBLA), metabolic load-dependent tolerance, and post-exercise recovery markers were assessed using breath-by-breath gas analysis, heart rate monitoring, and capillary blood lactate sampling. The study aims to determine whether the 30-15IFT elicits more sensitive and sport-specific physiological responses compared with treadmill testing, thereby supporting its use in performance monitoring and individualized training prescription in elite women's football.

Interventions

OTHER30-15 Intermittent Fitness Test

Participants performed the 30-15 Intermittent Fitness Test consisting of 30-second running bouts interspersed with 15-second passive recovery periods, with progressive increases in running speed until volitional exhaustion.

OTHERControl

Inspiratory Muscle Warm-Up Non-treated group, Control

Sponsors

Gümüşhane Universıty
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Intervention model description

This study used a randomized crossover design in which all participants completed both the 30-15 Intermittent Fitness Test and a treadmill-based incremental running test. The order of the test protocols was randomized, and a 48-hour recovery period was implemented between sessions to minimize carryover effects. Physiological responses were compared within participants across the two testing conditions.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 30 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Female football players aged 18-35 years * Competing in the Turkish Women's Super League * Minimum of 3 years of professional football experience, * Full participation in training and matches during the previous 6 months, * Ability to perform maximal exercise testing

Exclusion criteria

* Musculoskeletal injury affecting performance within the last 3 months, * Diagnosed cardiovascular, metabolic, or respiratory disease, * Any condition limiting maximal physical effort

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Maximal Running Speed (MRS)DAY 1Highest running speed achieved during each protocol.
Maximal Oxygen Uptake (VO₂max)Day 1Maximal oxygen uptake measured via breath-by-breath gas analysis.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
body composition1 DayBody composition (BMI)
Maximal Heart Rate (HRmax)1 DayPeak heart rate achieved during each test.
Maximal Oxygen Uptake (VO₂max)DAY 1Maximal oxygen uptake measured via breath-by-breath gas analysis.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORcoşkun yılmaz, associate professor

Gümüşhane Universıty

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 7, 2026