Skip to content

G-CSF-Induced Bone Pain and Supportive Care Approaches

Prospective Observational Evaluation of Supportive Care Strategies for G-CSF-Induced Bone Pain and Associated Symptoms in Patients With Solid Tumors

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07192770
Acronym
GCSF-PAIN
Enrollment
225
Registered
2025-09-25
Start date
2025-09-27
Completion date
2026-02-19
Last updated
2026-02-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Solid Tumors, Chemotherapy-induced Neutropenia

Keywords

G-CSF, Bone Pain, Chemotherapy Supportive Care, Quality of Life, Fatigue, Depression, Sleep Quality, Patient-Reported Outcomes, G-CSF-Induced Bone Pain

Brief summary

This prospective observational study aims to evaluate bone pain and related symptoms in patients with solid tumors receiving granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) during chemotherapy. A total of 128 patients will be enrolled at Ankara Etlik City Hospital. Pain severity will be assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and supportive care strategies such as analgesics and non-pharmacological approaches will be documented. Patient-reported outcomes, including quality of life, fatigue, anxiety, depression, and sleep quality, will also be evaluated before and one week after G-CSF administration. The findings are expected to provide practical insights into the management of G-CSF-induced bone pain and improve supportive care practices.

Detailed description

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is widely used for primary or secondary prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia. Despite its clinical benefits, G-CSF frequently induces bone pain, which negatively affects treatment adherence, quality of life, and overall patient comfort. This prospective observational study is designed to systematically evaluate bone pain, quality of life, functional status, mood, and sleep quality in patients with solid tumors receiving G-CSF. A total of 128 participants will be consecutively enrolled at Ankara Etlik City Hospital. Study Cohort: All enrolled patients will be adults (aged 18-70 years) with histologically or cytologically confirmed solid tumors receiving chemotherapy with prophylactic G-CSF (filgrastim, pegfilgrastim, or lipegfilgrastim). Participants will be consecutively recruited and assessed for bone pain and supportive care needs before and one week after G-CSF administration. If different G-CSF agents are used, subgroup analyses will be performed according to the type of G-CSF received. Study Design and Visits: Eligible patients will be assessed at baseline (before G-CSF administration) and one week after G-CSF. Data will include demographic and clinical characteristics, treatment details, laboratory parameters, and patient-reported outcomes. Pain intensity will be measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), with scores ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). A ≥20% reduction will be considered a clinically meaningful improvement. Patient-Reported Outcomes and Validation: EORTC QLQ-C30 (Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30): Validated in Turkish cancer populations. Scores range from 0-100; higher functional and global health scores indicate better outcomes, whereas higher symptom scores reflect greater symptom burden. FACT-G (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General): Turkish validation is available. Scores range from 0-108; higher scores indicate better overall quality of life. FACT-F (Fatigue Subscale): Part of the FACT measurement system, validated in Turkish cancer patients. Scores range from 0-52; higher scores indicate lower fatigue severity. PHQ-9 (Patient Health Questionnaire-9): Turkish validation established. Scores range from 0-27. Cut-offs: 5-9 mild, 10-14 moderate, 15-19 moderately severe, ≥20 severe depression. GAD-7 (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7): Validated in Turkish. Scores range from 0-21. Cut-offs: 5 mild, 10 moderate, ≥15 severe anxiety. Beck Depression Inventory (BDI): Validated Turkish version used. Scores range 0-63. Cut-offs: 0-9 minimal, 10-18 mild, 19-29 moderate, 30-63 severe depression. PSQI (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index): Turkish validation established. Global scores range from 0-21; scores \>5 indicate poor sleep quality. Study Outcomes: The primary outcome is the change in VAS bone pain scores from baseline to one week after G-CSF administration. Secondary outcomes include changes in QLQ-C30, FACT-G, FACT-F, PHQ-9, GAD-7, BDI, and PSQI scores. Analgesic use and correlations between demographic/clinical features (age, ECOG status, tumor type) and supportive care strategies will also be explored. Significance: This study is expected to generate real-world evidence on the prevalence, severity, and management of G-CSF-induced bone pain in patients with solid tumors. Incorporating validated patient-reported outcome tools with established cut-offs ensures methodological rigor and facilitates cross-study comparability. Results may guide clinicians in selecting effective supportive interventions, reduce symptom burden, and improve adherence to chemotherapy.

Interventions

Patients receive chemotherapy with prophylactic G-CSF (granulocyte colony-stimulating factor) as part of routine clinical care. Both short-acting (filgrastim) and long-acting formulations (pegfilgrastim, lipegfilgrastim) may be used according to standard oncology practice. The study does not assign the intervention but observes supportive care strategies and patient-reported outcomes related to G-CSF-induced bone pain.

OTHERSupportive Care (Analgesic and Non-Pharmacological Strategies)

Supportive care strategies including analgesic use (NSAIDs, opioids, antihistamines) and non-pharmacological interventions (rest, exercise, local heat/cold, relaxation techniques) will be recorded as part of routine practice. The study does not randomize or assign supportive care but documents their use and association with bone pain outcomes.

Sponsors

Ankara Etlik City Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age 18-70 years * Histologically or cytologically confirmed solid tumor * Receiving chemotherapy with prophylactic or secondary prophylactic G-CSF (filgrastim, pegfilgrastim, or lipegfilgrastim) * ECOG performance status 0-3 * Able to complete patient-reported outcome questionnaires (VAS, QLQ-C30, FACT-G, FACT-F, PHQ-9, GAD-7, BDI, PSQI) * Written informed consent provided

Exclusion criteria

* Known bone metastases (confounds bone pain assessment) * Use of NSAIDs, opioids, or antihistamines within 48 hours prior to G-CSF administration * Patients not indicated for G-CSF prophylaxis * Severe cognitive impairment or communication barrier preventing completion of questionnaires * Active concurrent malignancy requiring systemic therapy * Known hypersensitivity to G-CSF or supportive care medications * Investigator judgment that participation may compromise data integrity or patient safety * ECOG performance status 4

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Bone Pain Score (0-10)Baseline and 1 week after G-CSF administrationPatient-reported bone pain intensity using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS, range 0-10; 0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain). A ≥20% reduction in score is considered a clinically meaningful improvement.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Global Health/Quality of Life Score (0-100)Baseline and 1 week after G-CSF administrationChange in global health status/quality of life score from the EORTC QLQ-C30 (0-100 scale). Higher scores indicate better quality of life. Turkish validation available.
Change in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) Total Score (0-108)Baseline and 1 week after G-CSF administrationChange in FACT-G total score (0-108). Higher scores indicate better overall quality of life. Turkish validation available.
Change in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Fatigue (FACT-F) Subscale Score (0-52)Baseline and 1 week after G-CSF administrationChange in FACT-F subscale score (0-52). Higher scores indicate less fatigue. Turkish validation available.
Change in Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) Depression Score (0-27)Baseline and 1 week after G-CSF administrationChange in PHQ-9 depression score (0-27). Cut-offs: 5-9 mild, 10-14 moderate, 15-19 moderately severe, ≥20 severe depression. Turkish validation available.
Change in Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) Score (0-21)Baseline and 1 week after G-CSF administrationChange in GAD-7 anxiety score (0-21). Cut-offs: 5 mild, 10 moderate, ≥15 severe anxiety. Turkish validation available.
Change in Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) Score (0-63)Baseline and 1 week after G-CSF administrationChange in BDI score (0-63). Cut-offs: 0-9 minimal, 10-18 mild, 19-29 moderate, 30-63 severe depression. Turkish validation available.
Change in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) Score (0-21)Baseline and 1 week after G-CSF administrationChange in PSQI global score (0-21). Higher scores indicate poorer sleep quality. A global score \>5 indicates poor sleep. Turkish validation available.
Analgesic Use During Study Period (%)Baseline to 1 week after G-CSF administrationType and frequency of analgesics (NSAIDs, opioids, antihistamines) and non-pharmacological supportive measures recorded during follow-up.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOREnes Yeşilbaş, MD

Etlik City Hospital Medical Oncology Department

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 21, 2026