Skip to content

A Study of Firsekibart Versus Anakinra in Adult-Onset Still's Disease

Efficacy and Safety of Firsekibart Versus Anakinra in Adult-Onset Still's Disease

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07191444
Enrollment
20
Registered
2025-09-24
Start date
2025-09-24
Completion date
2027-07-31
Last updated
2026-04-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Still's Disease, Adult-Onset

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of firsekibart versus anakinra in patients with AOSD.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALFirsekibart

Firsekibart will be administered according to the protocol

BIOLOGICALAnakinra

Anakinra will be administered according to the protocol

Sponsors

Ruijin Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age: This study will include subjects aged 18 to 75 years (inclusive), regardless of gender. * Subjects must be willing to participate in the study and voluntarily sign an informed consent form. * Diagnosis of AOSD will be based on the Yamaguchi criteria: Major criteria: (1) Fever ≥39°C lasting for ≥1 week; (2) Arthralgia lasting for ≥2 weeks; (3) Typical rash; (4) White blood cell count ≥10×10\^9/L with neutrophils ≥80%. Minor criteria: (1) Sore throat or pharyngitis; (2) Lymphadenopathy and/or splenomegaly; (3) Abnormal liver function; (4) Negative rheumatoid factor and antinuclear antibody.

Exclusion criteria

(1) Infectious diseases (especially sepsis and EBV infection); (2) Malignancies (especially lymphoma); (3) Other rheumatic diseases (particularly systemic vasculitis). After excluding the above

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The proportion of subjects achieving clinical inactive disease (CID) at Week 24, where CID is defined as the absence of Still's disease-related symptoms with normal ESR or CRP levels.At Week 24 from initiation of treatment

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of subjects achieving afebrile status with either ≥50% reduction in CRP levels or CRP within normal range at Weeks 2, 4, and 8.At Weeks 2, 4, and 8 after treatment initiationEfficacy Endpoints
Proportion of subjects achieving afebrile status with either ≥70% reduction in CRP levels or CRP within normal range at Week 12.At Week 12 after treatment initiationEfficacy Endpoints
Proportion of subjects achieving afebrile status with either ≥70% reduction in CRP levels or CRP within normal range, and glucocorticoid dose ≤0.2 mg/kg/day at Week 12.At Week 12 after treatment initiationEfficacy Endpoints
Proportion of subjects achieving afebrile status with either ≥70% reduction in CRP levels or CRP within normal range, and glucocorticoid dose ≤0.1 mg/kg/day at Week 12.At Week 12 after treatment initiationEfficacy Endpoints
Proportion of subjects achieving clinical inactive disease (CID) with discontinuation of glucocorticoidsAt Week 24 after treatment initiationEfficacy Endpoints
Proportion of subjects without disease relapse at Weeks 12 and 24.At Weeks 12 and 24 after treatment initiationEfficacy Endpoints
ACR30, ACR50, ACR70, and ACR90 response rates at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24.At Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 after treatment initiationEfficacy Endpoints
Change from baseline in ferritin levels at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24.At Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 after treatment initiationEfficacy Endpoints
Change from baseline in cytokine levels (including sIL-2R) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24.At Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 after treatment initiationEfficacy Endpoints
Change from baseline in ESR at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24.At Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 after treatment initiationEfficacy Endpoints
Change from baseline in CRP levels at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24At Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 after treatment initiationEfficacy Endpoints
Change from baseline in Pouchot score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24.At Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 after treatment initiationEfficacy Endpoints. Pouchot score ranges from 0 to 12 points, with higher scores indicating a poorer outcome.
Change from baseline in glucocorticoid dose at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24.At Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 after treatment initiationEfficacy Endpoints
Number of participants with treatment-related adverse events as assessed by CTCAE v5.0Through study completion, an average of 1 year

Countries

China

Contacts

CONTACTChengde Yang
yangchengde@sina.com13501717833
CONTACTQiongyi Hu
hugiongyi131@163.com18317071395

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 14, 2026