Skip to content

Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation for Insomnia in Survivors of Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Feasibility and Efficacy of Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation for Insomnia in Survivors of Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07191119
Enrollment
40
Registered
2025-09-24
Start date
2026-03-31
Completion date
2029-12-01
Last updated
2026-08-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL), Insomnia, Survivor of Childhood Cancer

Brief summary

This pilot study will assess the usefulness and potential effectiveness of using transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS) for treating insomnia in adult survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Participants will be randomized to receive either active (verum) or inactive (sham) nightly stimulation using a non-invasive earbud device over two time periods: 2 weeks and 8 weeks. The study will assess adherence to the intervention and estimate its effects on sleep quality, stress, and neurocognitive function. Primary Objective: Aim 1: To determine a) short-term and b) long-term feasibility of tVNS in terms of participation in ALL Survivors with moderate to severe insomnia. Aim 2: To estimate the effect size of tVNS on sleep quality, stress, and neurocognitive outcomes in ALL survivors with insomnia. Exploratory Objectives Aim 1: To investigate the onset of tVNS effect via actigraphy measures over the intervention epoch. Aim 2: To estimate the effect size of genetic variants on sleep quality within verum tVNS.

Detailed description

Approximately 40 adult survivors of childhood ALL enrolled in the SJLIFE cohort will be recruited. Eligible participants must have moderate to severe insomnia (ISI ≥8). The intervention involves nightly use of a tVNS device for 20 minutes before sleep. Participants will be randomized to receive either active or sham stimulation. Feasibility will be assessed based on adherence rates, and efficacy will be estimated using subjective (PSQI, ISI) and objective (actigraphy, CNS Vital Signs) measures. Exploratory analyses will examine the onset of tVNS effects and the influence of genetic variants (BDNF rs6265, COMT rs4680) on treatment response.

Interventions

DEVICESoterix tVNS device

Active transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS) using the Soterix device. Stimulation is delivered nightly for 20 minutes at 80% of the participant's discomfort threshold.

DEVICESoterix tVNS device (sham programmed)

The sham stimulation used the Soterix device, but without active electrical stimulation. The procedure mimics the verum condition in duration and setup. Inactive stimulation is delivered nightly for 20 minutes at 80% of the participant's discomfort threshold.

BEHAVIORALSleep Quality

Receive Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI); Insomnia Severity Index (ISI); Sleep diaries; Actigraphy via Fitbit Charge 5

BEHAVIORALNeurocognitive and mental health outcomes

Measured using CNS Vital Signs and DASS-21.

Sponsors

St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DEVICE_FEASIBILITY
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Masking description

The participant will be blinded to the assigned treatment.

Intervention model description

A blinded, randomized sham/placebo-controlled pilot study with self-administered tVNS. While "Device Feasibility" generally has fewer than 10 participants, the aim is to ensure safety in a novel device population. While this does not fit into "Supportive Care," it also requires more participants for considerations: * Using a blinded 1:1 sham:verum study design with a control arm to ensure device feasibility is not affected by perceived stimulation. It is important to consider the inherent experience of tVNS. * As this is a novel population for the device and treatment, the study aims to ensure an adequate sample size to obtain effect size estimates to inform power analyses on future trials will be achieved.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Survivor of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) * Enrolled on SJLIFE * Participant was less than 21 years of age at time of diagnosis. * Age 20-50 years at the time of enrollment * Insomnia Severity Index \>=8 (Proxy \>=8) confirmed prior to enrollment * Access to home Wi-Fi and Smartphone * Participant is able to speak and understand the English language * Participant is able and willing to give consent

Exclusion criteria

* Unable to understand the details and requirements of the study (at the discretion of the PI) * Female participants who are pregnant or planning to become pregnant * Presence of implanted electrical medical devices (i.e. pacemaker) * Currently taking medication intended to treat neurocognitive impairment (i.e. stimulants) or medications prescribed for seizure management * History of skin irritation or other issues during stimulation of inner ear * Currently utilizing a technological intervention for a sleep disorder (e.g. CPAP) * Medications and behavioral practices (white noise, night-time yoga, etc) are acceptable as long as the insomnia is persistent. * History of a contraindicated health condition including: * Syncope (CTCAE \>2) * Cardiac dysrhythmia (CTCAE \>2) * Vascular Disease (CTCAE \>2) * Coronary Artery Disease (CTCAE \>2) * Active contraindicated heath condition including: * Cranial Nerve Disorder (CTCAE \>2) * Cardiac tachycardia (CTCAE \>2) * Neuropathy (Cranial Nerves) (CTCAE \>2) * Neuralgia (Cranial Nerves) (CTCAE \>2) * Overt Cerebrovascular Accident (CTCAE \>2) * Seizures (Any in most recent 1 year * Currently enrolled or participating in any other neurostimulation or neuromodulation ancillary research studies

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Change in Subjective Sleep QualityBaseline, 2-weeks, 8-weeksPittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI, 0-57 points). Descriptive statistics of the difference between experiment arms of the change between baseline and 2 weeks, and baseline and 8 weeks will be reported.
Mean change in clinical insomnia scoreBaseline, 2-weeks, 8-weeksInsomnia Severity Index (ISI, 0-28 points). Descriptive statistics of the difference between experiment arms of the change between baseline and 2 weeks, and baseline and 8 weeks will be reported.
Occurrence of side effectsWeek 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4, Week 5, Week 6, Week 7Patient Report of Incidence of Side Effects (PRISE). Descriptive statistics of the change between baseline and 2 and 8 weeks will be reported.
Adherence to intervention2-weeks, 8-weeksNumber of tVNS sessions performed. Descriptive statistics of adherence at 2 weeks and 8 weeks will be reported.
Mean change in Processing Speed (age adjusted z-score)Baseline, 2-Weeks, 8-weeksSymbol Digit Coding Test as the difference between correct responses and errors. Descriptive statistics of the difference between experiment arms of the change between baseline and 2 weeks, and baseline and 8 weeks will be reported.
Mean change in Executive Function (age adjusted z-score)Baseline, 2-Weeks, 8-weeksShifting Attention Task as the difference between correct responses and errors. Descriptive statistics of the difference between experiment arms of the change between baseline and 2 weeks, and baseline and 8 weeks will be reported.
Mean change in Simple Attention (age adjusted z-score)Baseline, 2-Weeks, 8-weeksContinuous Performance Test as the difference between correct responses and commission errors. Descriptive statistics of the difference between experiment arms of the change between baseline and 2 weeks, and baseline and 8 weeks will be reported.
Mean change in Reaction Time (age adjusted z-score)Baseline, 2-Weeks, 8-weeksStroop Test as the average of reaction times in the complex and default trials. Descriptive statistics of the difference between experiment arms of the change between baseline and 2 weeks, and baseline and 8 weeks will be reported.
Mean change in Sustained Attention (age adjusted z-score)Baseline, 2-Weeks, 8-weeksFour-Part Continuous Performance Test as the difference between correct responses and incorrect responses in Part 2, 3, and 4. Descriptive statistics of the difference between experiment arms of the change between baseline and 2 weeks, and baseline and 8 weeks will be reported.
Mean change in Working Memory (age adjusted z-score)Baseline, 2-Weeks, 8-weeksFour-Part Continuous Performance Test as the difference between correct responses and incorrect responses in Part 4 only. Descriptive statistics of the difference between experiment arms of the change between baseline and 2 weeks, and baseline and 8 weeks will be reported.
Mean change in Complex Attention (age adjusted z-score)Baseline, 2-Weeks, 8-weeksEvaluated with the Stroop Test (ST), Shifting Attention Test (SAT), and Continuous Performance Test (CPT) as the sum of ST commission errors, SAT errors, CPT commission errors, and CPT omission errors. Descriptive statistics of the difference between experiment arms of the change between baseline and 2 weeks, and baseline and 8 weeks will be reported.
Mean change in Cognitive Flexibility (age adjusted z-score)Baseline, 2-Weeks, 8-weeksEvaluated with the Stroop Test (ST) and Shifting Attention Test (SAT) as the difference between SAT correct responses and the sum of the SAT errors and ST commission errors. Descriptive statistics of the difference between experiment arms of the change between baseline and 2 weeks, and baseline and 8 weeks will be reported.
Mean change in Depression, Anxiety, and Stress (scales)Baseline, 2-Weeks, 8-weeksEvaluated with Depression Anxiety Stress Scale Short Form (DASS SF-21). Descriptive statistics of the difference between experiment arms of the change between baseline and 2 weeks, and baseline and 8 weeks will be reported. DASS SF-21 are reported as population z-scores and categorized into five severity ranges: normal, mild, moderately severe, and extremely severe. The severity levels, higher percentiles being more severe, are determined by z-scores from the DASS manual.
Mean Change in Heart Rate Variability (ms)Weekly means of daily measurements at baseline, at 2-weeks, and at 8-weeksRoot Mean Square Successive Difference (RMSSD) of heart rate variability. Descriptive statistics of the difference between experiment arms of the change between baseline and 2 weeks, and baseline and 8 weeks will be reported.
Mean Change in Sleep Onset Latency (minutes)Weekly means of daily measurements at baseline, at 2-weeks, and at 8-weeksSleep Onset Latency (time in bed before sleep). Descriptive statistics of the difference between experiment arms of the change between baseline and 2 weeks, and baseline and 8 weeks will be reported.
Mean Change in Waking Events (count)Weekly means of daily measurements at baseline, at 2-weeks, and at 8-weeksNumber of Awakenings. Descriptive statistics of the difference between experiment arms of the change between baseline and 2 weeks, and baseline and 8 weeks will be reported.

Countries

United States

Contacts

CONTACTJustin E Tanner, PhD
referralinfo@stjude.org888-226-4343
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORJustin E Tanner, PhD

St. Jude Children's Research Hospital

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 15, 2026