Skip to content

Efficacy of Olfactive Training on Loss of Smell and Taste Caused by SARS CoV2 COVID-19 (Covid-Smell)

Efficacy of Olfactive Training on Loss of Smell and Taste Caused by SARS CoV2 (Covid-Smell)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07190911
Acronym
COVID-SMELL
Enrollment
40
Registered
2025-09-24
Start date
2020-11-18
Completion date
2022-03-09
Last updated
2025-10-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

COVID - 19

Keywords

Covid-19, olfactory training, olfactory and taste loss

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate efficiency of two months of olfactive training on olfactory and taste loss secondary to covid-19. We will compare 2 groups : olfactive training group versus no olfactive training group.

Detailed description

The purpose of this study is to evaluate efficiency of two months of olfactive training on olfactory and taste loss secondary to covid-19. We will compare 2 groups : olfactive training group versus no olfactive training group.

Interventions

OTHEROlfactory rehabilitation consists of smelling a series of spices every day for 2 months

Olfactory rehabilitation consists of smelling a series of spices every day for 2 months: vanilla, coffee, dill, thyme, cinnamon, cloves, lavender, coriander, light vinegar, mint, and cumin. This rehabilitation is based on the protocols proposed by SFORL (French ORL society) and Oleszkiewicz et al.8 Allergies to certain spices will be noted at the start of the study: * in known allergy: change by another spice which belongs to the same chemical category. * in case of allergies to several scents: patient is not included in the study. * in case of allergy appearing during participation: clinical evaluation by ENT, change by another spice which belongs to the same chemical category. * in case of allergies to several scents occuring during participation: patient is excluded from the study.

Sponsors

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de la Guadeloupe
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE (Caregiver)

Intervention model description

To prove this efficiency, a parallel prospective comparative study appear to be one of the best the way.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* SARS-CoV-2 infection suspect or confirmed * supported by CHU Guadeloupe * with brutal olfactory or taste loss * affiliated or beneficiary of a social security scheme * informed consent signed

Exclusion criteria

* recent rhinosinusitis, less than 6 months * lingual pathology * communication disorder * Patients subject to a justice safeguard * Allergy to several spices that are part of the rehabilitation set * Pregnant or breastfeeding women * Absence of signed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Taste and Smell Survey (TSS).Baseline and 2 monthsPatients will have this auto evaluation scale at the inclusion (D0) and 2 month after inclusion (D60).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Sniffin' stick test :2 monthThe Sniffin' Stick Test assesses the sense of smell by measuring odor detection threshold, discrimination, and identification, and is used for diagnosing and monitoring olfactory disorders.
Olfaction and taste evolution evaluated with a daily visual scaleEvery day from inclusion to 2 monthsVisual analogue scale from 0 to 10 to assess dysosmia and dysgeusia, with 0 indicating normal function and 10 indicating complete deficit.

Countries

Guadeloupe

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026