Skip to content

Hypnobreastfeeding vs. Traditional Education

Hypnobreastfeeding vs. Traditional Education

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07190521
Enrollment
111
Registered
2025-09-24
Start date
2025-09-25
Completion date
2025-12-20
Last updated
2025-09-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Breastfeeding

Brief summary

Breastfeeding is a vital component of maternal and infant health, and its success is closely linked to the mother's psychological readiness, self-efficacy, and perception of milk sufficiency. In recent years, alternative educational approaches such as hypnobreastfeeding, which integrates hypnosis and relaxation techniques into prenatal education, have gained increasing attention. These approaches aim to improve maternal self-efficacy, reduce stress and anxiety during the breastfeeding period, and promote better adaptation to breastfeeding in the early postpartum phase. Traditional prenatal breastfeeding education primarily focuses on anatomical, physiological, and practical aspects of breastfeeding. While effective, this approach may not sufficiently address maternal fears, emotional barriers, or negative birth experiences that can undermine breastfeeding outcomes. In contrast, hypnobreastfeeding education incorporates guided imagery, affirmations, breathing techniques, and deep relaxation, offering a more holistic preparation for breastfeeding. Emerging studies suggest that mothers who receive hypnobreastfeeding training demonstrate higher levels of breastfeeding self-efficacy, stronger emotional bonding, better adaptation to breastfeeding, and lower perceptions of insufficient milk compared to those receiving standard education. This review explores the comparative effectiveness of hypnobreastfeeding versus traditional prenatal breastfeeding education, focusing on three key outcomes: maternal self-efficacy, breastfeeding adaptation, and perceived insufficient milk supply. The findings indicate that combining psychological readiness techniques with conventional education may enhance maternal confidence and breastfeeding continuity. Further research with larger sample sizes and long-term follow-up is needed to validate the integration of hypnobreastfeeding into routine antenatal care.

Detailed description

Prenatal Education Group: Traditional prenatal education programs provide information-based training on childbirth and newborn care, including breastfeeding. This method is primarily knowledge-focused and offers mothers guidance on breastfeeding techniques, common problems, and suggested solutions. Hypnobreastfeeding Group: This method aims to help mothers develop relaxation, self-confidence, and stress management skills regarding breastfeeding through the use of hypnosis techniques. Hypnosis may support mothers in forming more positive subconscious beliefs about breastfeeding. Control Group: All first-time pregnant mothers who do not receive either traditional prenatal education or hypnobreastfeeding training will be included in this group.

Interventions

Hypnobreastfeeding education is an antenatal training method that combines: Hypnotherapy principles Guided imagery Affirmations Breathing and deep relaxation techniques

OTHERTraditional prenatal education

Traditional prenatal education programs, often referred to as antenatal or maternity school classes, are structured group sessions provided to pregnant women, typically in clinical or community settings. These classes aim to: Prepare expectant mothers for labor, birth, and postpartum care, Provide evidence-based information about breastfeeding, newborn care, and maternal recovery, Promote positive health behaviors during pregnancy, Reduce fear and anxiety by increasing knowledge and confidence.

Sponsors

Sakarya University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Gestational age between 28 and 36 weeks, Primiparous pregnant women, Age between 18 and 40 years, Singleton pregnancy, Spontaneous conception (not assisted reproductive technology), No visual or hearing impairments, No communication difficulties, Completion of traditional prenatal (antenatal) education, Completion of hypnobreastfeeding education, No medical conditions preventing breastfeeding (e.g., anatomical breast issues), Voluntary participation in the study.

Exclusion criteria

Diagnosis of high-risk pregnancy, Multiple pregnancy (twins, triplets, etc.), Conception via assisted reproductive techniques, Diagnosis of a severe psychiatric disorder, Failure to complete either prenatal education or hypnobreastfeeding education, Declining to participate in the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
To determine the breastfeeding self-efficacy levels of mothers.16 weeksAssessed using the Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale
To determine the breastfeeding Adaptation levels of mothers.16 weeks(Assessed using the Breastfeeding Adaptation Scale.)

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Contacts

Primary ContactÖznur Tiryaki, Asoss.Prof.
oznuritiryaki@gmail.com0264 295 7271

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026