Skip to content

Phase III Non-Inferiority Trial: Reduced-Target vs. Full-Target IMRT After Chemo in Immunotherapy-Treated Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Cancer

A Multicenter, Phase III Non-Inferiority Clinical Trial: Locoregional Volume-Reduction Versus Conventional Definitive Target IMRT Following Full-Dose Chemotherapy for Treatment-Naïve Distant Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Undergoing Full-Course Immunotherapy

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07188584
Enrollment
166
Registered
2025-09-23
Start date
2025-08-20
Completion date
2031-07-01
Last updated
2025-12-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma (NPC)

Keywords

Distant Metastasis Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Full Course Immunotherapy, Reduced-Target Radiotherapy, Full-dose Chemotherapy

Brief summary

In order to further verify the effectiveness of the new prevention irradiation model for low-risk areas for nasopharyngeal carcinoma under immunotherapy, our team intends to conduct a non-inferiority clinical trial. The aim is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of two treatment modalities - local region reduced-target radiotherapy versus full-target radiatiotherapy (with/without CTV2) for newly diagnosed distant metastasis nasopharyngeal carcinoma, based on the full-course immunotherapy and full-dose chemotherapy. The primary endpoints are 2-year PFS and the incidence of grade 3 or higher radiation-related adverse events. If non-inferiority is confirmed, a new standard of immunotherapy combined with reduced-target radiotherapy will be established, ensuring efficacy while significantly reducing toxicity, and providing a more optimal comprehensive treatment strategy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Detailed description

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma is a highly prevalent malignant tumor in the southern regions of China, with approximately 4% to 10% of patients presenting with distant metastasis at the initial diagnosis. The five-year survival rate of traditional sole systemic chemotherapy is less than 10%, and there is an urgent need to explore more effective treatment strategies. Our team previously conducted a single-center study (402 cases) and a national multicenter retrospective study (794 cases) and first revealed that local regional radiotherapy combined with systemic chemotherapy resulted in a 60% reduction in mortality compared to systemic chemotherapy alone (HR = 0.40) (Chen MY, Chin J Cancer, 2013; Eur J Cancer, 2015). To verify this finding, with the support of the 5010 project of Sun Yat-sen University, our team initiated the world's first phase III prospective clinical trial for newly diagnosed distant metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma in 2014. This trial confirmed that after 6 courses of adequate systemic chemotherapy, the control group was followed up, while the experimental group received local regional full-target area adequate radiotherapy, covering the gross tumor volume (GTV), high-risk clinical target area 1 (CTV1), and low-risk clinical target area 2 (CTV2), with a total radical dose of 70 Gy, 60 Gy and 54 Gy for prophylactic radiotherapy, extending the median progression-free survival (mPFS) from 6.7 months to 12.4 months, and the 2-year PFS rate from 3.6% to 35.0%. This adequate chemotherapy + full-target adequate radiotherapy dual-model achieved the Global ASCO 17 Major Clinical Oncology Breakthrough by the American Society of Clinical Oncology in 2021, directly promoting the inclusion of local radiotherapy in the standard recommended treatment for metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the US NCCN treatment guidelines, European ESMO guidelines, Chinese CSCO guidelines and CACA guidelines (Chen MY, JAMA Oncology, 2020). With the widespread application of PD-1 monoclonal antibodies, GP chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy (with a maximum mPFS of 21.4 months and 2-year PFS of 44.8%) has become the first-line chemotherapy regimen for recurrent/metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma. However, these single-drug studies did not combine local-region radiotherapy, and its value in newly diagnosed distant metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma has not been optimized. Therefore, our team further conducted a phase II clinical trial, sequentially administering local-region full-target radiotherapy and PD-1 monoclonal antibody during and after systemic adequate chemotherapy, and the results showed that the mPFS exceeded 30.6 months, and the 2-year PFS rate reached 54%, confirming the outstanding efficacy of the adequate chemotherapy + half-course immunotherapy + full-target radiotherapy triple model (Chen MY, Cell Reports Medicine, 2023). However, the preventive irradiation area CTV2 in full-target radiotherapy has a wide coverage and is irradiated with a dose of 54 Gy or more, resulting in a 33.9% incidence of grade 3 acute mucositis and 5.2% of late hearing damage and other adverse events, severely restricting treatment tolerance. Moreover, basic research has revealed that lymph node integrity is crucial for immunotherapy, and excessive destruction of draining lymph nodes (\>30 Gy) will deplete the Tim-3-TCF-1⁺ CD8+ T cell subset (with stem cell characteristics, driving long-term responses to PD-1 monoclonal antibodies), while weakening the ability of antigen-presenting cells to activate T cells, leading to impaired systemic anti-tumor immunity. Clinical retrospective analysis also indicates that patients undergoing extensive preventive lymph node dissection who received PD-1 monoclonal antibody treatment had significantly shorter PFS (HR = 0.46). Based on this, we propose the following hypothesis: In the era of immunotherapy, omitting the traditional CTV2 for the irradiation area, and exempting the low-risk invasion area of the primary lesion and the lymphatic drainage areas such as the neck II-IV zone from the preventive irradiation, can not only reduce toxicity but also preserve the lymph node immune microenvironment, thereby potentially enhancing the systemic anti-tumor response and being more conducive to the control of systemic metastatic lesions. Therefore, our team has further carried out a phase II clinical trial. After 6 courses of full-dose chemotherapy and immunotherapy, sequential local-region reduced-CTV2 radiotherapy and concurrent and maintenance immunotherapy of PD-1 monoclonal antibody were administered. The results showed that the 1-year PFS rate was as high as 77%, preliminarily suggesting that the full-dose chemotherapy + full-course immunotherapy + reduced target radiotherapy new triad model may be superior to the conventional full-target radiotherapy original triad model. To further verify the effectiveness of this new model, our team intends to conduct the world's first phase III non-inferiority clinical trial for the initial treatment of advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Patients with newly diagnosis distant metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma who respond sensitively to chemoradiotherapy will be included. Under the full-course PD-1 treatment, they will randomly receive reduced-target radiotherapy (GTV + CTV1) or full-target radiotherapy (GTV + CTV1 + CTV2). The primary endpoints are the 2-year PFS rate (non-inferiority threshold HR = 1.5) and the incidence of grade 3 or higher radiotherapy-related adverse events. The innovation of this research lies in: pioneering a new radiotherapy strategy under nasopharyngeal carcinoma immunotherapy that exempts the preventive irradiation of low-risk areas; revealing the mechanism correlation between reduced-target radiotherapy and the dynamics of immune cell subgroups; providing evidence-based evidence for minimal irradiation in immunotherapy for solid tumors. If the study confirms non-inferiority, it will achieve three major translational values: clinical level, establishing a new standard of reduced-target radiotherapy - immune synergy; scientific level, clarifying the regulatory role of lymph node microenvironment in radiotherapy and immunotherapy; social level, optimizing the allocation of medical resources by improving the quality of life of patients and their treatment compliance. The implementation of this study will challenge the traditional full-target radiotherapy paradigm, providing a more efficient and less toxic reduced-target radiotherapy scheme for metastasis nasopharyngeal carcinoma, as well as locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma and even other solid tumors, with significant clinical and scientific significance.

Interventions

RADIATIONReduced-Target Radiotherapy

Experimental group: GTVnx: 69.96 Gy/33 Fr/2.12 Gy; GTVnd: 69.96 Gy/33 Fr/2.12 Gy; CTV1: 60.60 Gy/33 Fr/1.82 Gy; GTV2: No prescription dose (only delineated, actual dose is scattered dose).

RADIATIONConventional Full-Target Radiotherapy

Control group: GTVnx: 69.96 Gy/33 F/2.12 Gy; GTVnd: 69.96 Gy/33 F/2.12 Gy; CTV1: 59.4 Gy/33 F/1.8 Gy; CTV2: 54 Gy/33 F/1.64 Gy.

Sponsors

Fifth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University
CollaboratorOTHER
Cancer Hospital of Guangxi Medical University
CollaboratorOTHER
Fujian Cancer Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine Central South University
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Sun Yat-sen University
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Affiliated Cancer Hospital & Institute of Guangzhou Medical University
CollaboratorOTHER
Zhejiang Cancer Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
West China Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Xiangya Hospital of Central South University
CollaboratorOTHER
Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College
CollaboratorOTHER
Yunnan Cancer Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University
CollaboratorOTHER
Wuzhou Red Cross Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Zhongshan People's Hospital, Guangdong, China
CollaboratorOTHER
Southern Medical University, China
CollaboratorOTHER
Ming-Yuan Chen
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age: 18 years - 70 years. * The patient has signed the informed consent form and is willing and able to follow the visit schedule, treatment plan, laboratory tests and other research procedures as per the research plan. * Newly diagnosed distant metastasis patients who achieved complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) after receiving adequate first-line systematic therapy (platinum-containing doublet chemotherapy + PD-1 monoclonal antibody). * Nasopharyngeal carcinoma non-keratinizing carcinoma (differentiated or undifferentiated type, i.e., WHO type II or III), confirmed by histological and/or cytological examination, with metastatic lesions detected on imaging (biopsy of metastatic tissue is preferred but not mandatory). * Clinical stage: TanyNanyM1, stage IVB (AJCC 9th edition). * ECOG score: 0-1. * Female subjects with reproductive capacity must have a negative urine or serum pregnancy test within 7 days prior to enrollment, and must agree to take effective contraceptive measures during the study. * For male subjects, if the female partner still has reproductive capacity, the male subject must agree to take effective contraceptive measures during the study.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with malignant pleural effusion or those with other malignant tumors * Patients who have received ≥2 prior lines of systemic therapy. * Patients with known or suspected autoimmune diseases, including dementia and epileptic seizures. * Patients with grade ≥ II coronary heart disease, arrhythmia (including QTc interval prolongation in males \> 450 ms, females \> 470 ms) and heart failure. * Patients who received systemic or local glucocorticoid treatment within 4 weeks prior to enrollment. * Patients with comorbidities requiring long-term use of immunosuppressive drugs or requiring systemic or local use of corticosteroids at immunosuppressive doses. * Patients with active pulmonary tuberculosis (TB), who are undergoing anti-TB treatment or have received anti-TB treatment within 1 year prior to screening. * HIV-positive individuals; HBsAg positive and HBV DNA copy number positive (quantitative detection ≥ 1000 cps/ml); chronic hepatitis C blood screening positive (HCV antibody positive). * Patients who received any anti-infective vaccine (such as influenza vaccine, varicella vaccine, etc.) within 4 weeks prior to enrollment. * At the time of randomization, the expected lifespan of the patients was less than 6 months. * Other patients deemed unsuitable for inclusion by the treating physicians.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
2-year Progression-Free Survival (PFS)2 yearsThe PFS was defined as the duration from the date of random assignment to the date of disease progression or censored at the date of the last follow-up.
The incidence rate of radiotherapy-related ≥ grade 3 adverse events2 yearsIncluding the evaluation of acute subjective and objective toxic reactions as well as the evaluation of late subjective toxic reactions. The NCI-CTC 5.0 standard and RTOG standard were adopted.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall survival time (OS)2 yearsDefined as the time interval from the start of randomization, due to any cause, death occurs (if no death, censored at the last known survival date).
Health-related Quality of Life2 yearsChanges from baseline in patient-reported quality of life scores assessed every 2 cycles using the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, version C30). The scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a better quality of life outcome.
Objective Response Rate(ORR)2 yearsDefined as the proportion of patients who, after receiving treatment, have achieved complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) and maintain this state for a certain period of time (evaluated by the investigator according to RECIST 1.1)
Head and Neck Cancer-Specific Quality of Life2 yearsChanges from baseline in head and neck cancer-specific symptoms and functions assessed every 2 cycles using the EORTC QLQ-H&N35 module (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Head and Neck Cancer Module). The scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a better quality of life outcome and lower scores indicating worse symptoms or functions.
Adverse Events Reporting2 yearsNumber of participants with treatment-related adverse events as assessed by CTCAE v5.0
Disease control rate (DCR)2 yearsDefined as the proportion of patients who achieve CR + PR + SD after receiving treatment, and maintain this state for at least 4 weeks.

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactMing-Yuan Chen, MD,PhD
chmingy@mail.sysu.edu.cn86-13903052650
Backup ContactRui You, MD, PhD
your5@mail.sysu.edu.cn13580439820

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026