Skip to content

Evaluating the Clinical Efficacy of Thulio vs. Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate

Evaluating the Clinical Efficacy of Thulio vs. Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07187180
Enrollment
50
Registered
2025-09-22
Start date
2025-06-02
Completion date
2026-09-30
Last updated
2025-09-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

BPH With Symptomatic Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms, BPH With Urinary Obstruction

Keywords

BPH, Enlarged prostate, Thulio laser, Prostate enucleation, male urinary retention

Brief summary

Many consider laser enucleation of the prostate the new 'gold standard' for the surgical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) due to its excellent outcomes, high success rates, and long-term efficacy. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) was the earliest form of prostate enucleation and is recommended by the American Urological Association (AUA), along with thulium laser enucleation of the prostate (ThuLEP), as size-independent techniques for the management of BPH with fewer complications than transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). Further development of laser technology has additionally led to enucleation using pulsed-modulated (e.g. Virtual Basket™ mode or MOSES™ mode) holmium lasers as well as the thulium fiber laser.

Detailed description

Study Design This is a prospective randomized study to evaluate the differences in outcomes comparing the existing laser to a new laser among patients undergoing HoLEP. Patients will be evaluated prior to the procedure and at one follow-up time point. Patients will be randomized in equal numbers to each group. The primary outcome will be non-inferiority in hemostasis timing. Several secondary outcomes will be evaluated including enucleation time, active laser time, morcellation time, prostate volume, change in hemoglobin, applied total laser energy, enucleation efficacy (g/min), IPSS (International Prostate Symptom Score), QoL (Quality of Life), uroflowmetry, PVR (post-void residual), duration of catheterization.

Interventions

Prostate enucleation will holmium laser (control)

DEVICEpulsed thulium laser

experimental group - pulsed thulium laser prostate enucleation

Sponsors

Smita De
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Understand and voluntarily sign an informed consent form. * Patients must be males with a prostate, at least 18 years of age * No prior prostate surgery

Exclusion criteria

* Unable/refuse to provide informed consent * Prior prostate surgery * Bladder stones that requiring lasering (small stone that can be removed whole is ok) * Unable to hold anticoagulants or antiplatelets per standard protocols for surgery and up to 1 week postop.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Hemostasis timeDuring surgerytime required to get adequate hemostasis intraoperatively

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Blood LossDuring surgeryEstimated blood loss (mL)
Operative parametersDuring surgeryEnucleation time (minutes)
Laser parametersDuring surgeryLaser time (minutes)
Subjective laser performanceDuring surgerySurgeon estimation of collateral tissue injury and overall performance (scale 1 minimum 10 maximum)
Perioperative outcomes0-5 days after surgeyvolume of tissue removed (mL)

Countries

United States

Contacts

Primary ContactIva Markovic
markovi@ccf.org216-636-9694
Backup ContactSmita De, MD, PHD
des@ccf.org216-445-4818

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026