Skip to content

Hybrid Type I Effectiveness-implementation Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial of CARES

Hybrid Type I Effectiveness-Implementation Cluster Randomized Trial of CARES

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07183527
Acronym
CARES
Enrollment
1750
Registered
2025-09-19
Start date
2025-08-08
Completion date
2030-01-31
Last updated
2026-08-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

CARES, Standard of Care

Keywords

implementation, stepped collaborative care, integrated screening and treatment, cluster randomized controlled trial, cancer, screening

Brief summary

The trial will examine the effectiveness and facilitators and barriers of implementation of CARES, an integrated screening and stepped collaborative care intervention

Detailed description

Over 18 million Americans are living with cancer. Half of them report clinically significant levels of depression, pain, and/or fatigue. According to the NIH consensus statement, these are the three most common and distressing cancer-related symptoms. These symptoms lead to poorer health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and cancer-related treatment adherence, higher unplanned health care utilization and costs, and reduced life expectancy. Investigators observed in a trial of CARES, an integrated screening and stepped collaborative care intervention, that 75% versus 4% of participants initiated treatment when compared to standard of care. Improvements in HRQoL and reductions in pain, depression, fatigue, emergency room visits, readmissions to the hospital, and length of stay in the hospital were observed. The cost savings to the health care system was $17,085 per patient per year when compared to standard of care. The overarching objective of the proposed study is to move CARES from research to routine clinical care. Investigators plans to test the effectiveness of CARES in a pragmatic trial or "real world" setting. An implementation-focused process evaluation of participant and clinician engagement with CARES guided by the RE-AIM framework will also be performed. Finally, to prepare to disseminate the intervention, a full cost-effectiveness analysis of CARES will be conducted.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALCARES

Integrated screening and stepped collaborative care

BEHAVIORALStandard of Care (SOC)

Screening and referral of patient to provider in the community or cancer center

Sponsors

University of Pittsburgh
Lead SponsorOTHER
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
CollaboratorNIH

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
TRIPLE (Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of Cancer * Age 18 years or older * Read and write in English

Exclusion criteria

* Evidence of thought disorder * Evidence of delusions * Evidence of hallucinations * Evidence of suicidal ideation with a plan

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-GeneralEnrollment to the end of study for participant (12 months). The primary time point is 6 monthsHealth Related Quality of Life. A total score (0-108) and subscales scores (0-24 or 0-28) with a higher score reflecting a better quality of life

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient Health Questionnaire-9Screening to baseline and baseline to 12 months. The primary outcome will be at 6-months.Depressive Symptoms. A higher score reflecting more severe depressive symptoms (range of scores 0-27)
Brief Pain Inventory.Screening to baseline and baseline to 12 months. The primary outcome will be from baseline to 6-monthsPain intensity and interference. The Pain, Enjoyment, and General Activity score (0-10) will be used as the secondary outcome. A higher score reflects greater pain interference.
Generalized Anxiety Disorder -7Screening to baseline and baseline to 12 months. The primary time point is from baseline to 6 months.Anxiety. The total score ranges from 0-21. A higher score indicates higher levels of anxiety.
FACIT FatigueBaseline to 12 months. The primary time point will be 6 months.Fatigue. A total score ranges from 0-52. A higher score indicates less fatigue.
PROMIS DepressionBaseline to 12 months. The primary time point is 6 months. The questionnaire will be used for treatment response 0-24 weeks (every 4 weeks).Depressive symptoms. The range is from a T scores of 0-100 with a higher score reflecting higher levels of depressive symptoms.
PROMIS AnxietyBaseline to 12 months.Anxiety. Scores range from a T score of 0-100 and a higher score reflects worse anxiety. Used for treatment response and primary endpoint 6 months.
Fatigue Assessment ScaleEnrollment to the end of study for participant (12 months). The primary time point is 6 months. The questionnaire will also be used for treatment response 0-24 weeks (every 4 weeks).Fatigue. The total score ranges from 10 to 50. A higher score reflects more severe fatigue.
Pain Visual Analog ScaleBaseline to 12 months. The 6 month time point is primary. The questionnaire will also be used for treatment response 0-24 weeks (every 4 weeks) and then for the booster session at the end of treatment up until 12 months.Pain Severity. Total score ranges from 0-100. A higher score reflects higher levels of pain.
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality IndexEnrollment to the end of study for participant (12 months). The primary time point is 6-months.Sleep problems. The total sleep quality (0-21) and subscales including the sleep duration (0-24), sleep disturbance (0-3), sleep latency (0-3), days of dysfunction (0-3), efficiency (0-3), overall sleep quality (0-3), medications to sleep (0-3). A higher score means more sleep problems.
Interpersonal Support Evaluation ListEnrollment to the end of study for participant (12 months). The primary time point is 6-months.Social support. A higher score reflects better social support. The range of scores 0-48 with subscales including appraisal (0-16), belonging (0-16), and tangible (0-16).
COSTEnrollment to the end of study for participant (12 months). The primary time point will be at 12 months.Financial toxicity. The range of scores is from 0-44 and a higher scores reflects a better financial well being.
Cost CopingEnrollment to the end of study for participant (12 months). The primary time point will be 12 months.Cost coping strategies. The total score is the number of cost coping strategies a patient uses to manage their financial costs associated with their medical care. The total number of cost coping strategies is 0-26.
EQ 5D 5L (this is the title of the instrument there is no non abbreviated title)Enrollment to the end of study for participant (12 months). The primary time point is 12 months.Health related quality of life. Total score ranges from 0-25 for part 1 and 0 to 100 for part 2. A higher score reflects a better quality of life.
Cost AssessmentEnrollment to the end of study for participant (12 months). The primary time point is 12 months.Health Care Utilization. There is no total score for this questionnaire as it will be used to estimate costs.
Activity Based CostsEnrollment to the end of study for participant (12 months). The primary time point is 12 months.Health care costs. Range could be 0 to 10 million dollars
Adherence to outpatient appointmentEnrollment to the end of study for participant (12 months). The primary time point is 12 months.Adherence to outpatient appointments. Percent of appointments missed out of total appointment in 12 months.
ComplicationsBaseline to 12 monthsNumber of complications from procedures or surgeries during 12 months post randomization. The primary time point is 12 months.
Length of Stay in the HospitalBaseline to 12 monthsNumber of days patient was in the hospital. The primary end point is 12 months
Emergency Room Visits12 monthsNumber of emergency room visits in 12 months post-randomization. The primary end point is 12 months
30-day readmissionsBaseline to 12 monthsUnplanned readmission to the hospital after a procedure or surgery within 30 days. Primary end point 12 months
90-day readmissionBaseline to 12 monthsUnplanned readmission to the hospital after a procedure or surgery within 90 days. The primary endpoint is 12 months
PROMIS FatigueScreening to baseline and baseline to 12 monthsAssesses fatigue in cancer patients. Higher score reflects greater fatigue. Score range from a T score 0-100. Primary end point baseline to 6 months

Countries

United States

Contacts

CONTACTJennifer L Steel, PhD
Steejl@upmc.edu14126922041
CONTACTJennifer L Steel
steejl@upmc.edu4126922041
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORJennifer L Steel, PhD

University of Pittsburgh

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 11, 2026