Anxiety, Depression, Interpersonal Needs, Quality of Life (QOL), Self Concept, Self Esteem, Spina Bifida
Conditions
Brief summary
This clinical trial assesses the effect of a telecare psychosocial intervention designed for adults with spina bifida. The intervention consists of 10 weekly 1.5-hour group sessions, followed by two 3-month follow-up sessions. Each group will consist of 6 to 7 individuals. The intervention is aimed at strengthening aspects of self-concept, self-esteem, social skills and aims at a reduction of symptomatology and a general improvement of psychological well-being.
Detailed description
The present study undertakes the development and evaluation of a structured, psychosocial teleassistance intervention designed for adult individuals with spina bifida. The variables of interest and intervention include quality of life, self-esteem, self-concept, anxious-depressive symptomatology, interpersonal needs and coping strategies. The study aims to test whether the psychosocial teleassistance programme improves the aforementioned variables.
Interventions
The teleassistance psychosocial intervention involves 10 weekly 90-minute group sessions, with each group comprising 6 to 7 participants. These sessions are designed to enhance self-concept, self-esteem and social skills, reduce symptoms, and improve overall psychological well-being. Two follow-up sessions will be provided three months after the main program concludes.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* To be diagnosed with spina bifida by a specialist. * Being between 18 and 75 years old. * Having their informed consent or the informed consent of their legal guardians. * Having Spanish as one of their main languages. * Having access to a computer (with a camera, microphone and speakers integrated) and Internet connection to take part in the videoconferences.
Exclusion criteria
* Age that is inconsistent with the established range. * The presence of any comorbid diagnosis or sensory deficit that would impede the effective execution of the intervention's activities.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Self-Concept - Self-Concept Questionnaire Form-5 | 3 months after the intervention | The Self-Concept Questionnaire Form-5 (AF-5) is an instrument used to evaluate self-concept across five dimensions: social, academic-work/professional, emotional, family, and physical. Domain scores are transformed to a scale ranging from 0 to 10. Higher scores indicate a better self-concept across domains, while lower scores reflect worse self-concept in those areas. |
| Anxiety and depression - The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale | 3 months after the intervention | The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) is a scale primarily designed to assess anxiety and depressive symptomatology using 14 items. The instrument is composed of two subscales: an anxiety subscale and a depression subscale. Total scores on each subscale range from 0 to 21, where a higher score is indicative of greater symptom severity. |
| Depression - The Patient Health Questionnaire | 3 months after the intervention | The Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) is a brief, nine-item tool designed to detect and measure the severity of depression. The score can range from 0 to 27. Higher scores reflect more severe depressive symptoms, whereas lower scores indicate minimal or no depressive symptoms. |
| Self-esteem - The Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale | 3 months after the intervention | The Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSE) is a 10-item scale designed to assess self-esteem. The final score ranges from 10 to 40. Higher scores reflect greater self-esteem, whereas lower scores indicate reduced self-esteem. |
| Quality of life - The World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF Quality of Life Assessment | 3 months after the intervention | The World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF Quality of Life Assessment (WHOQOL-BREF) is a tool designed to assess quality of life using twenty-six items. The questionnaire measures four different domains: physical health, psychological health, social relationships, and environment. Domain scores are transformed to a scale ranging from 0 to 100. Higher scores reflect better quality of life. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Coping strategies - The Brief Cope Stress Questionnaire | 3 months after the intervention | The Brief Cope Stress Questionnaire (COPE-28) is an instrument that consists of 28 items used to assess fourteen coping strategies: active coping, planning, instrumental support, emotional support, self-distraction, venting, disengagement, positive reinterpretation, denial, acceptance, religion, substance use, humor, and self-blame. Higher scores indicate greater use of specific coping strategies, while lower scores reflect less frequent use. |
| Interpersonal Needs - The Interpersonal Needs Questionnaire | 3 months after the intervention | The Interpersonal Needs Questionnaire (INQ) is designed to assess the degree of frustration with various interpersonal needs. This 12-item questionnaire is divided into two subscales: thwarted belongingness and perceived burdensomeness. Higher scores reflect higher levels of perceived burdensomeness and thwarted belongingness. |
| Functionality - The Barthel Index | 3 months after the intervention | The Barthel Index (IB) is an instrument used to evaluate physical functionality and level of independence across ten basic activities of daily living. Scores range from 0 to 100. A higher score reflects better functional independence, whereas a lower score indicates greater dependence for daily activities. |
Countries
Spain