Skip to content

Effect of Two Different Mobilization Techniques in the Treatment of Low Back Pain

Effect of SNAG Versus Maitland Techniques in the Management of Non-Specific Low Back Pain

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07177040
Enrollment
60
Registered
2025-09-16
Start date
2025-10-05
Completion date
2026-01-20
Last updated
2025-10-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Non-specific Low Back Pain (NSLBP)

Brief summary

Non-specific low back pain (NSLBP) is extensively musculoskeletal conditions, where manual therapy techniques have been widely employed in its management, but their short term efficacy in chronic low back pain still need more investigations. Objective: This study aimed to discuss the SNAG versus Maitland techniques in the management of NSLBP. Methods: 60 patients with chronic NSLBP will share in the study. Sessions will be conducted 3 times per week for 4 weeks. The outcomes will be evaluated for pain by the numerical rating pain scale (NPRS), disability through Oswestry Disability Index, flexion range of motion by back range of motion device, postural stability by Biodex system will be assessed at baseline, immediately post-intervention, and at a four-week follow-up

Interventions

PROCEDUREMaitland

Maitland technique therapy, which consists of passive mobilizations applied to the lumbar facet joints in an anterocranial direction while the patient is in a prone lying position

PROCEDURESNAG

The technique involves applying a sustained glide to the lumbar facet joints while the patient is in a sitting position, and the pelvic girdle will be stabilized by a belt. Then the therapist will ask the patient for active forward flexion of the spine while the pressure on the facet joint is maintained during the movement till its end

Sponsors

The Scientific Research Deanship, University of Ha'il
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Ehab Mohamed Kamel Ahmed
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
25 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adults aged 25 to 40 years. * Diagnosed with chronic NSLBP persisting for more than three months. * Pain intensity between 3 to 6 on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) during lumbar extension in a sitting position. * Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score between 20% to 40%. * Restriction of the movement only in flexion ROM with the ability to perform at least 40° of trunk flexion.

Exclusion criteria

* Specific causes of low back pain (e.g., herniated disc, spinal stenosis). * History of spinal surgery or trauma. * Neurological deficits or systemic diseases affecting the musculoskeletal system. * Pregnancy. * Current participation in other physiotherapy programs.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Numeric Pain Rating Scale4 weeksThe NPRS will be used to evaluate the level of pain by selecting a number on a rating scale, ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst and unbearable pain).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Functional disability4 weeksAssessed by the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) where according to the scale the disability will be indicated as follow: 0-4 no disability, 5-14 mild disability, 5-24 moderate disability, 25-34 severe disability, and 35-50 complete disability
Lumbar flexion range of motion4 weeksMeasured using a Back range of motion (BROM)
overall stability index (OSI)4 weeksRepositioning error evaluated through proprioceptive testing provided by the Biodex Balance System, no need for cut off) as the measurement differences will be compared.

Countries

Saudi Arabia

Contacts

Primary ContactEhab Ahmed, PhD
em.ahmed@uoh.edu.sa+966564032363

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026