Skip to content

Surfactant Using a Supraglottic Airway Device in Late Preterm to Early Term Infants

Surfactant Prophylaxis in LAte Preterm to Early Term Infants Using a Supraglottic Airway Device to Help Improve Outcomes

Status
Enrolling by invitation
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07176117
Acronym
SPLASH
Enrollment
422
Registered
2025-09-16
Start date
2025-11-20
Completion date
2031-06-30
Last updated
2026-07-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Respiratory Distress Syndrome (Neonatal), Surfactant

Keywords

supraglottic airway device

Brief summary

The purpose of this research is to learn new information that may help other infants that have respiratory distress syndrome and need breathing support after birth. The goal of this research is to see if continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) alone or CPAP with surfactant administration through a less invasive method via an Airway Device (supraglottic airway device) temporarily placed above the vocal cords is better for treating respiratory distress syndrome in late preterm and early term infants.

Interventions

PROCEDURESurfactant Administration Through Laryngeal or Supraglottic Airway (SALSA)

A single dose of surfactant will be given via Surfactant Administration Through Laryngeal or Supraglottic Airways (SALSA). A supraglottic airway device will be used as a standardized procedure for surfactant administration via SALSA using an AirLife Air-Q.

PROCEDUREContinuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP)

Infants to receive continuation of non-invasive respiratory support will remain on continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP).

Sponsors

Sharp HealthCare
Lead SponsorOTHER
Chiesi USA, Inc.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
33 Weeks to 38 Weeks
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Newborns 33-38+6 weeks gestation at birth * ≤ 6 hours old * Respiratory Distress: \[Silverman Andersen Score (SAS) ≥ 5, or Respiratory Severity Score (RSS) ≥ 1.25\] * Clinical decision for non-invasive respiratory support * Written parental consent

Exclusion criteria

* Surrogate deliveries * Major congenital or chromosomal anomalies * Prior intubation or receipt of surfactant * Known or suspected hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) * Known or suspected neuromuscular disorder * Unanticipated survival

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Difference in Ranked Composite of MorbiditiesFrom date of birth (day of life 1) through study completion at birth-hospital discharge, up to 6 months of age.Determine if there is a difference in ranked composite of morbidities including death, development of pneumothorax/ pulmonary air leaks, Respiratory Severity Score (RSS), time to initial feeding, and LOS (length of hospital stay) between the treatment and control groups using a linked count of participants who fall within each prespecified rank.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Length of Hospital StayFrom date of birth (day of life 1) through study completion at birth-hospital discharge, up to 6 months of age.Length of hospital stay (LOS), days.

Countries

United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORAnup Katheria, MD

Sharp HealthCare

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 14, 2026