Atrial Fibrillation (Paroxysmal)
Conditions
Keywords
Pulsed Field Ablation, Pulmonary Vein Isolation, Atrial Fibrillation
Brief summary
Two non-thermal ablation techniques approved for routine clinical practice (CE-marked) for the interventional treatment of atrial fibrillation are compared in a 1:1 randomization to investigate patient data, procedural data, effectiveness, and safety.
Detailed description
Patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation were randomized 1:1 to undergo pulmonary vein isolation using pulsed field ablation (PFA) with either single-shot PFA (FARAPULSE) or single-tip PFA (Galvanize Therapeutics). Baseline characteristics, procedural data, effectiveness, and safety outcomes were analyzed. In each group, a subset of consecutive patients underwent cerebral magnetic resonance imaging to assess silent cerebral lesions and was scheduled for biomarker assessment (blood sampling) to evaluate inflammation and troponin release after PFA.
Interventions
Pulmonary vein isolation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation
A subset of consecutive patients of each group (n=25 of each group) receives cMRI on the day after the procedure to asses silent cerebral lesions. A control cMRI is scheduled in case of positive findings.
A subset of patients of each group (n=25 of each group) received blood tests to asses inflammation and troponine release.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Recurrent, symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation * Age \> 18 years * Patient consen
Exclusion criteria
* Refusal of the patient * Inability to provide informed consent * Life expectancy \< 2 years * Pregnancy and breastfeeding (due to radiation exposure) * History of left atrial ablation * Known macro-reentry or focal atrial tachycardia * Significant mitral valve stenosis * History of heart valve replacement or reconstruction * NYHA class III and IV * Left ventricular ejection fraction \< 35% * Left atrial enlargement \> 55 mm on echocardiography * Intracardiac thrombus prior to the procedure * Severe pulmonary disease with abnormal blood gases or requiring oxygen therapy * Renal insufficiency (GFR \< 30 mL/min) due to contrast medium use * Stroke or TIA within the last 6 months * Symptomatic carotid stenosis * Active malignancy within the previous 24 months * Untreated or uncontrolled thyroid disease * Active bleeding or chronic bleeding tendency not amenable to curative treatment * Body mass index \> 35 kg/m² * Contraindication to CT examination (e.g., contrast medium allergy or severe claustrophobia)
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Primary outcome: Freedom from arrhythmia | 12 months follow-up | The clinical efficacy, e.g. freedom from atrial arrhythmias / atrial fibrillation is assessed by 5-7 day Holter Monitoring at 3, 6 and 12 months after the procedure. Any documented arrhythmia episode lasting \>30s was calculated as failure. A three months blanking period was considered. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Secondary outcomes: Complications, Silent cerebral lesions (cMRI) and biomarker assessments | 6 weeks | All peri-procedural complications were noted. In a subset of consecutive patients (n = 25 in each group), cerebral magnetic resonance tomography (cMRI) was performed on the day after the ablation procedure to assess silent cerebral lesions. In case of positive cMRI findings (e.g. silent lesion), repeat cMRI was scheduled in 6 weeks. Biomarker analyses were performed using blood samples, e.g. high-sensitive troponin release at 6, 24 and 48 hours after the ablation as a marker of myocardial injury and C-reactive proteine levels before and 24 hours after the ablation procedure to asses inflammatory response. |
Countries
Germany