Skip to content

TWOSOME Trial: Single-Shot Versus Single-Tip Pulsed Field Ablation for Pulmonary Vein Isolation

Safety and Efficacy of New, Non-thermal Ablation Techniques for the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation - A Comparison of Two Ablation Systems

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07175727
Enrollment
100
Registered
2025-09-16
Start date
2023-01-24
Completion date
2025-05-23
Last updated
2025-09-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atrial Fibrillation (Paroxysmal)

Keywords

Pulsed Field Ablation, Pulmonary Vein Isolation, Atrial Fibrillation

Brief summary

Two non-thermal ablation techniques approved for routine clinical practice (CE-marked) for the interventional treatment of atrial fibrillation are compared in a 1:1 randomization to investigate patient data, procedural data, effectiveness, and safety.

Detailed description

Patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation were randomized 1:1 to undergo pulmonary vein isolation using pulsed field ablation (PFA) with either single-shot PFA (FARAPULSE) or single-tip PFA (Galvanize Therapeutics). Baseline characteristics, procedural data, effectiveness, and safety outcomes were analyzed. In each group, a subset of consecutive patients underwent cerebral magnetic resonance imaging to assess silent cerebral lesions and was scheduled for biomarker assessment (blood sampling) to evaluate inflammation and troponin release after PFA.

Interventions

DEVICEPulmonary vein isolation

Pulmonary vein isolation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

RADIATIONcerebral magnetic resonance tomography

A subset of consecutive patients of each group (n=25 of each group) receives cMRI on the day after the procedure to asses silent cerebral lesions. A control cMRI is scheduled in case of positive findings.

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTBiomarker assessment (C-reacitve Protein, troponine)

A subset of patients of each group (n=25 of each group) received blood tests to asses inflammation and troponine release.

Sponsors

Alfried Krupp Krankenhaus
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Recurrent, symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation * Age \> 18 years * Patient consen

Exclusion criteria

* Refusal of the patient * Inability to provide informed consent * Life expectancy \< 2 years * Pregnancy and breastfeeding (due to radiation exposure) * History of left atrial ablation * Known macro-reentry or focal atrial tachycardia * Significant mitral valve stenosis * History of heart valve replacement or reconstruction * NYHA class III and IV * Left ventricular ejection fraction \< 35% * Left atrial enlargement \> 55 mm on echocardiography * Intracardiac thrombus prior to the procedure * Severe pulmonary disease with abnormal blood gases or requiring oxygen therapy * Renal insufficiency (GFR \< 30 mL/min) due to contrast medium use * Stroke or TIA within the last 6 months * Symptomatic carotid stenosis * Active malignancy within the previous 24 months * Untreated or uncontrolled thyroid disease * Active bleeding or chronic bleeding tendency not amenable to curative treatment * Body mass index \> 35 kg/m² * Contraindication to CT examination (e.g., contrast medium allergy or severe claustrophobia)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Primary outcome: Freedom from arrhythmia12 months follow-upThe clinical efficacy, e.g. freedom from atrial arrhythmias / atrial fibrillation is assessed by 5-7 day Holter Monitoring at 3, 6 and 12 months after the procedure. Any documented arrhythmia episode lasting \>30s was calculated as failure. A three months blanking period was considered.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Secondary outcomes: Complications, Silent cerebral lesions (cMRI) and biomarker assessments6 weeksAll peri-procedural complications were noted. In a subset of consecutive patients (n = 25 in each group), cerebral magnetic resonance tomography (cMRI) was performed on the day after the ablation procedure to assess silent cerebral lesions. In case of positive cMRI findings (e.g. silent lesion), repeat cMRI was scheduled in 6 weeks. Biomarker analyses were performed using blood samples, e.g. high-sensitive troponin release at 6, 24 and 48 hours after the ablation as a marker of myocardial injury and C-reactive proteine levels before and 24 hours after the ablation procedure to asses inflammatory response.

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026