Skip to content

Comparing the Impact of AMNIOEFFECT Application vs Standard of Care on Post-Operative Healing in Patients Who Have Undergone Thyroid and Parathyroid Surgery Via the Transcutaneous Approach

Comparing the Impact of AMNIOEFFECT Application vs Standard of Care on Post-Operative Healing in Patients Who Have Undergone Thyroid and Parathyroid Surgery Via the Transcutaneous Approach

Status
Enrolling by invitation
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07173621
Enrollment
334
Registered
2025-09-15
Start date
2025-11-24
Completion date
2027-12-01
Last updated
2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Incision, Parathyroid Diseases, Surgical Incision, Thyroid; Wound

Keywords

thyroid, parathyroid, surgery

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to understand how placing Amnioeffect on patients having transcutaneous thyroid or parathyroid surgery affects surgery scar appearance, pain, and the ability to swallow and compare it to patients who do not have anything placed during surgery. The Food and Drug Administration regulates the use of Amnioeffect for homologous use. Both Amnioeffect application and no Amnioeffect application are considered standard of care; however, for the purpose of this study, the use of Amnioeffect during surgery will be considered the intervention, and no Amnioeffect application will be the standard of care.

Detailed description

A product called AMNIOEFFECT has been developed as a barrier intended for use in the treatment of acute and chronic wounds, providing a protective environment to support the healing process. Manufactured by the company MIMEDX, it is a placental-based allograft made of lyophilized human amnion/intermediate/chorion membrane (LHACM). During the study, 334 patients who are to undergo transcutaneous thyroid or parathyroid surgery will be recruited to participate over a one-year period. Using a randomized control approach, the study would be conducted to evaluate the impact of AMNIOEFFECT placed over the strap muscle closure before the subcutaneous tissues and skin are reapproximated, compared to standard of care on post-operative pain, swallowing ability, and cosmesis (conferring of beauty) as indicated by scar appearance.

Interventions

OTHERAmnioeffect

Amnioeffect is a placental-based allograft made of lyophilized human amnion/intermediate/chorion membrane (LHACM)

Sponsors

Sarasota Memorial Health Care System
Lead SponsorOTHER
MiMedx Group, Inc.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

During the study, 334 patients who are to undergo transcutaneous thyroid or parathyroid surgery will be recruited to participate over a one-year period. A sample size of approximately 300 patients (150 per group), assuming a drop-out rate of 10%, a total sample size of 334 will be enrolled. Using a randomized control approach, the study would be conducted to evaluate the impact of AMNIOEFFECT placed over the strap muscle closure before the subcutaneous tissues and skin are reapproximated, compared to standard of care on post-operative pain, swallowing ability, and cosmesis (conferring of beauty) as indicated by scar appearance.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adults 18 years or older * Patients undergoing thyroid/parathyroid surgery via a transcutaneous incision * Participants must be willing and able to consent and take part in the study

Exclusion criteria

* Patients \< 18 years old * Pregnant patients * Patients with a history of keloid scarring * Patients who refuse blood products * Previous neck surgery * Patients on immunosuppressive medications (steroids, immune modulators, etc.) * Patients with a known sensitivity to aminoglycoside antibiotics * Patients with an active or latent infection * Patients with a disorder that would create an unacceptable risk of post-operative complications * Subjects may be excluded at the discretion of the physician(s) based on their clinical judgment and/or if the health or safety of the participant may be potentially impacted by taking part in this study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Improvement of scar appearancePre-procedure, 1 month post procedure, 3 months post procedureMeasured by use of the Vancouver Scar Scale; scores rating on vascularity, pigmentation, pliability, and height. Total score ranges from 0-13, with 0 being "normal" appearance.
Determine swallowing effectivenessPre-procedure, 1 month post procedure, 3 months post procedureMeasured by use of the SWAL-QOL (Swallowing Quality of Life) score; this survey uses a Likert scale rating to ask questions regarding swallowing difficulties and associated quality of life impacts. Higher scores reflect lower impact on quality of life; lower scores would indicate higher impact.
Improvement in Pain ScorePre-procedure, 1 month post procedure, 3 months post procedureMeasured by use of the Visual Analog Scale; scoring 0 for no pain-10 for unbearable pain.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 4, 2026